Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2007 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

On new populations of Rana holtzi and macrocnemis (Ranidae: Anura)

Rana holtzi ve Rana macrocnemis'in yeni populasyonları hakkında

Pages
241–247
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, ecological observations of localities where specimens were captured were determined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rana holtzi, which is only known from Karagöl at altitude 2500 m and Çinigöl at altitude 2600 m, was determined from Eğrigöl for the first time at altitude 3000 m.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, specimens of Rana macrocnemis were recorded from Seviçova (2500 m a.s.l.), located in the Bolkar Mountains near Ereğli (Konya), for the first time.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, ecological observations of localities where specimens were captured were determined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Rana holtzi, which is only known from Karagöl at altitude 2500 m and Çinigöl at altitude 2600 m, was determined from Eğrigöl for the first time at altitude 3000 m. Thus, the distribution range of R. holtzi in the Bolkar Mountains was extended. In addition, specimens of Rana macrocnemis were recorded from Seviçova (2500 m a.s.l.), located in the Bolkar Mountains near Ereğli (Konya), for the first time. Furthermore, the village of Örtülü (Maden, Elazığ), where specimens of Rana macrocnemis were captured, is determined to be southernmost distribution point of R. macrocnemis. Mountain frog specimens captured from new localities were compared in terms of significant taxonomical features with regard to the literature. In addition, ecological observations of localities where specimens were captured were determined.

Özet

Rana holtzi, which is only known from Karagöl at altitude 2500 m and Çinigöl at altitude 2600 m, was determined from Eğrigöl for the first time at altitude 3000 m. Thus, the distribution range of R. holtzi in the Bolkar Mountains was extended. In addition, specimens of Rana macrocnemis were recorded from Seviçova (2500 m a.s.l.), located in the Bolkar Mountains near Ereğli (Konya), for the first time. Furthermore, the village of Örtülü (Maden, Elazığ), where specimens of Rana macrocnemis were captured, is determined to be southernmost distribution point of R. macrocnemis. Mountain frog specimens captured from new localities were compared in terms of significant taxonomical features with regard to the literature. In addition, ecological observations of localities where specimens were captured were determined.

🔖

Cite This Article

OLGUN, K., AVCI, A., KUMLUTAŞ, Y., ILGAZ, Ç., İRET, F., BARAN, İ. (2022). On new populations of Rana holtzi and macrocnemis (Ranidae: Anura). Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 241–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/616527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Arıkan, H., Olgun, K., Tok, C.V. and Çevik, Ü.E. 2001. Morphological and serological investigations on the mountain frogs of mid- Taurus range between east longitudes 33¼ and 36¼. Turk. J. Zool. 25: 11-17.
  2. Baran, Ü. 1969. Anadolu Dağ Kurbağaları Üzerine Sistematik Bir Araştırma. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi İlmi Raporlar Serisi, Üzmir. Baran, I. and Atatür, M.K. 1986. A taxonomical survey of the mountain frogs of Anatolia. Amphibia-Reptilia 7: 115-133.
  3. Baran, Ü., Balık, S., Kumlutaş, Y., Tok, C.V., Olgun, K., Durmuş, H., Türkozan, O., Ilgaz, Ç. and Üret, F. 2001. Rana holtzi (Toros Kurbağası)'nin biyolojik ve ekolojik yönden araştırılması ve koruma stratejisinin saptanması. IV. Ulusal Ekoloji ve Çevre Kongresi, Bodrum. 213-218
  4. Başoğlu, M. and Hellmich, W. 1958 Auf herpetologischer Forschungstahrt in Ost-Anatolien. Die Aquarien-und Terrarien- Zeitschrift (Datz) 12: 118-121
  5. Bird, C.G. 1936. The distribution of reptiles and amphibians in Asiatic Turkey, with notes on a collection from the vilayets of Adana, Gaziantep and Malatya. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 18: 257-281
  6. Bodenheimer, F.S. 1944. Introduction into knowledge of amphibia and reptilia of Turkey. Rev. Fac. Sci. Univ. Üstanbul 9: 1-78.
  7. Boulenger, G.A. 1885. Description of a new species of frog from Asia Minor. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 22-23.
  8. Boulenger, G.A. 1886. Note sur les grenouilles rouses d'Asie. Bulletin Society Zoologie 11: 595-600.
  9. Çevik, Ü.E., Arıkan, H., Kaya, U. and Atatür, M.K. 2006. Comparative morphological and serological studies of three Anatolian Mountain frogs, Rana macrocnemis, R. camerani and R. holtzi (Anura, Ranidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 27: 63-71.
  10. Eiselt, J. 1965. Einige amphibien und reptilien aus der nordostlichen Turkei, gesmmelt von Herrn H. Steiner. Annalen Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. 67: 387-399.
  11. Kaya, U., Çevik, Ü.E. and Erişmiş, U. 2005.
  12. Population status of the Taurus Frog, Rana holtzi Werner, 1898, in its terra typica: Is there a decline? Turk. J. Zool. 29: 317-319.
  13. Lantz, L.A. and Cyren, O. 1913. Über die identitat von Rana macrocnemis und Rana camerani. Zoologischer Anzeiger 43: 214- 220. Mertens, R. 1952. Amphibien und reptilien aus der Turkei. Rev. Fac. Sci. Univ. Istanbul 17: 41-75.
  14. Özeti, N. 1970. Anadolu Dağ Kurbağaları ve Bunlara Yakın Bazı Türlerin Karşılaştırmalı Osteolojisi. Ege Univ. Fen Fak. Ülmi Rap. Bornova, Üzmir. Picariello, O., Feliciello, I., Scillitani, G., Cataudo, A., Maresca, I. and Chinalli, G. 1999. Morphological and mol