Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

A Preliminary Survey of Testudo graeca Linnaeus 1758 Specimens from Central Anatolia, Turkey

Pages
255–262
Publication Date
2005-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The difference was clearer between the Aegean and Central Anatolian populations, with a more domed carapace (CH) in the males and shorter plastron length (PL) and plastron width 2 (PW2) in the females of the Aegean population in comparison with the Central Anatolian population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sixteen specimens of Testudo graeca Linnaeus 1758 from 2 adjacent localities (Meke and Acıgöl) in Central Anatolia were measured.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The post-ANOVA pairwise analysis (Tukey's) across all groups verified sexual dimorphism in the Central Anatolian populations in terms of anal suture length (P < 0.05) and plastron width 2 (P < 0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The difference was clearer between the Aegean and Central Anatolian populations, with a more domed carapace (CH) in the males and shorter plastron length (PL) and plastron width 2 (PW2) in the females of the Aegean population in comparison with the Central Anatolian population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Testudines · Testudinidae · Testudo graeca

Abstract

Sixteen specimens of Testudo graeca Linnaeus 1758 from 2 adjacent localities (Meke and Acıgöl) in Central Anatolia were measured. Morphological characters standardised for straight carapace length (SCL) were compared with original raw values from Testudo populations from Aegean and south-eastern Turkey. The post-ANOVA pairwise analysis (Tukey's) across all groups verified sexual dimorphism in the Central Anatolian populations in terms of anal suture length (P < 0.05) and plastron width 2 (P < 0.05). Discriminant analysis based on standardised values provided 89.3% and 92.6% correct classification among males and females, respectively. The difference was clearer between the Aegean and Central Anatolian populations, with a more domed carapace (CH) in the males and shorter plastron length (PL) and plastron width 2 (PW2) in the females of the Aegean population in comparison with the Central Anatolian population.

Özet

Sixteen specimens of Testudo graeca Linnaeus 1758 from 2 adjacent localities (Meke and Acıgöl) in Central Anatolia were measured. Morphological characters standardised for straight carapace length (SCL) were compared with original raw values from Testudo populations from Aegean and south-eastern Turkey. The post-ANOVA pairwise analysis (Tukey's) across all groups verified sexual dimorphism in the Central Anatolian populations in terms of anal suture length (P < 0.05) and plastron width 2 (P < 0.05). Discriminant analysis based on standardised values provided 89.3% and 92.6% correct classification among males and females, respectively. The difference was clearer between the Aegean and Central Anatolian populations, with a more domed carapace (CH) in the males and shorter plastron length (PL) and plastron width 2 (PW2) in the females of the Aegean population in comparison with the Central Anatolian population.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKOZAN, O., OLGUN, K., WILKINSON, J., GILLETT, L., SPENCE, J. (2005). A Preliminary Survey of Testudo graeca Linnaeus 1758 Specimens from Central Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 255–262. https://ajindex.com/articles/214326

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Atalay, İ. 2002. Türkiye’nin Ekolojik Bölgeleri. Orman Bakanlığı Yayınları no: 163, Ankara, 266 pp. Ballasina, P.D.L. and Van der Kuyl, A.C. 2002. What is a Testudo graeca? Chelonii. 3: 130-132.
  2. Baran, İ. and Atatür, M. K. 1998. Türkiye Herpetofaunası (Kurbağa ve Sürüngenler). T.C. Çevre Bakanlığı. Ankara. 1-214 pp. Bafloğlu, M. and Baran, İ. 1977. Türkiye Sürüngenleri. Kısım I Kaplumbağa ve Kertenkeleler. Ege Univ. Fen Fak. Kitaplar Ser. N:76 Bornova-İzmir. p.1-272 pp. Berglas, R. 2000. Zwei Unterarten der Marische Landschildkröete. Testudo graeca in der Türkei. In: Herald Artner and Elmar Meier (Eds.). “Schildkröten Symposiumband” pp. 21-23.
  3. Beshkov, V.A. 1997. Record-sized tortoises. Testudo graeca ibera and Testudo hermanni Conservation and Biology. 2: 593-596. from Bulgaria. Chelonian Brinckmeier, C., Bode, F. and Hampe, A. 1989. First record of the marginated tortoise. Testudo marginata in Turkey. Zoology in the Middle East 3: 47-48.
  4. Oğuztüzün, C. 1995. Türkiye’nin tek Çölü. Atlas. Haziran, 54-56.
  5. Demirsoy, A. 1996. Genel ve Türkiye Zoocoğrafyası “Hayvan Coğrafyası” Meteksan A.fi., Ankara, 630 pp. Demirsoy, A. 1997.
  6. Türkiye Omurgalıları. “Sürüngenler” Meteksan A.fi., Ankara, 205 pp. Eiselt, J. and Spitzenberger, F. 1967. Ergebnisse zoologischer Sammelreisen in der Türkei: Testudines. Ann. Nat. Hist. Mus. 70: 357-378.
  7. Mertens, R. 1946. Über einige mediterrane Shildkroten-Rassen. Senckenbergiana. 27: 111-118. Perälä, J. 1996. Tortoises in southern Turkey. In Kanza, M., Perälä. J. and Vikberg, J. (Eds.). Herpetokonressi I. The Official Congress Publication. The Herp. Soc. of Finland, pp. 14-26. Perälä, J. 2002a. Morphological variation among Middle Eastern T. graeca L., 1758 (sensu lato), with a focus on taxonomy. Chelonii 3: 78-107. Perälä, J. 2002b. The genus Testudo (Testudines: Testudinidae): Phylogenetic inferences. Chelonii 3: 32–39.
  8. Pieh, A., Fritz, U. and Berglas, R. 2002a. New data on morphology, distribution and nomenclature of Testudo graeca armeniaca Chkhikvadze and Bakradze, 1991 (Reptilia: Testudines: Testudinidae). Faunistische Abhandlungen aus dem Museum für Tierkunde. 22 (21): 329–345.
  9. Pieh, A., Taflkavak, E. and Reimann, M. 2002b. Remarks on the variability of the spur-thighed tortoise (Testudo graeca) in Turkey. Chelonii. 3: 67-71.
  10. Stubbs, D. 1989. Testudo graeca Spur-thighed Tortoise. In: Swingland I.R. and Klemens M.W. (Eds). The Conservation Biology of Tortoises. Occasional papers of the IUCN species survival commission no: 5, pp: