Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

Distribution, density, and important hotspots of Krüper’s Nuthatch Sitta krueperi in Turkey and Lesvos Island, Greece

Pages
578–584
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results showedthat the western part of the study area had higher densities than the eastern part.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Atlas projects and phylogeographic studies provide detailed information of great value on key species; distribution maps ofthe species are the primary input for establishing hotspots, conservation, and management plans.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We surveyed more than 1400 point counts in Turkey and Greece, coveringmost of its global distribution in its potential habitat, coniferous forestland, during the breeding season.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results showedthat the western part of the study area had higher densities than the eastern part.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Atlas projects and phylogeographic studies provide detailed information of great value on key species; distribution maps ofthe species are the primary input for establishing hotspots, conservation, and management plans. Krüper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) isendemic to Anatolia, Lesvos Island, and the Caucasus region. We surveyed more than 1400 point counts in Turkey and Greece, coveringmost of its global distribution in its potential habitat, coniferous forestland, during the breeding season. The geographical informationsystem was used for preparing the distribution maps and depicting the hotspots for Krüper’s Nuthatch. The population density ofKrüper’s Nuthatch in all of Turkey was 10.25 ± 0.33 birds km–2, which was significantly higher than on Lesvos Island (1.94 ± 0.79 birdskm–2) (P < 0.001). We found a negative correlation between the population density of the species and longitude. These results showedthat the western part of the study area had higher densities than the eastern part. In conclusion, we recommend that the BeydağlarıMountains and the Aladağlar Mountains in southern Turkey, and the Ilgaz Mountains and/or Kartalkaya Mountains in northern Turkeyshould be considered hotspots and preserved for the conservation of the species. Furthermore, the Beydağları Mountains should beconsidered as an Important Bird Area for Krüper’s Nuthatch due to high population density and genetic diversity

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞAN, A., ALBAYRAK, T. (2022). Distribution, density, and important hotspots of Krüper’s Nuthatch Sitta krueperi in Turkey and Lesvos Island, Greece. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 578–584. https://ajindex.com/articles/616091

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akman Y (1995). Türkiye Orman Vejetasyonu. Ankara Üniv. Fen Fak. Botanik ABD. Albayrak T (2007). Determination of populatıon diversity, distribution and habitat preference of Krueper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) in Turkey and Lesvos Island. PhD, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. Albayrak T, Bairlein F, Erdoğan A (2010). Habitat parameters and breeding density of Kruper’s Nuthatch Sitta krueperi Pelzeln in southern Turkey. Pol J Ecol 58: 545-552.
  2. Albayrak T, Besnard A, Erdoğan A (2011). Morphometric variation and population relationships of Krüper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) in Turkey. Wilson J Ornithology 123: 734-740.
  3. Albayrak T, Gonzalez J, Drovetski SV, Wink M (2012). Phylogeography and population structure of Krüper’s Nuthatch Sitta krueperi from Turkey based on microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA. J Ornithol 153: 405-411.
  4. Albayrak T, Erdoğan A (2005). Breeding ecology of Kruper’s nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) near Antalya, Turkey. Isr J of Zool 51: 309-314.
  5. Albayrak T, Erdoğan A (2010). A GIS-based approach to assess the population size of Kruper’s Nuthatch, Sitta krueperi at a newly found breeding area in Inner Anatolia (Aves: Passeriformes). Zoology in Middle East 49: 27-32.
  6. Bellis LM, Rivera L, Politi N, Marti E, Perasso ML, Cornell F, Renison D (2009). Latitudinal patterns of bird richness, diversity and abundance in Polylepis australis mountain forest of Argentina. Bird Conserv Int 19: 265-276.
  7. Bibby C, Jones M, Marsden S (1998). Bird Surveys: Expedition Field Techniques. London, UK: Expedition Advisory Centre. Bibby JC, Gess ND, Hill DA (1992).
  8. Bird Census Techniques. London, UK: Academic Press.
  9. BirdLife International (2004). Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. BirdLife International (2016). Sitta krueperi. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22711184A94282660. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS. T22711184A94282660.en. Downloaded on 01 June 2017.
  10. Brotons L, Herrando S (2003). Effect of increased food abundance near forest edges on flocking patterns of Coal Tit Parus ater winter groups in mountain coniferous forests. Bird Study 50: 106-111.
  11. Brotons L, Manosa S, Estrada J (2004). Modelling the effects of irrigation schemes on the distribution of steppe birds in Mediterranean farmland. Biodivers Conserv 13: 1039-1058.
  12. Çolak AH, Rotherham ID (2006). A review of the forest vegetation of Turkey: its status past and present and its future conservation. Bio