Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

Ecological surveys on the parthenogenetic Artemia populations in the hypersaline lakes of Anatolia, Turkey

Pages
367–378
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The largest brood size was observed in the Acıgöl population and it may be concluded that local conditions for reproductivesuccess were more adequate in this population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study is to provide information on the parthenogenetic Artemia populations in some hypersaline lakes ofAnatolia (Tuz, Bolluk, Tersakan, and Acıgöl).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sampling studies were performed for abiotic factors and population parameters betweenNovember 2009 and October 2010.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The largest brood size was observed in the Acıgöl population and it may be concluded that local conditions for reproductivesuccess were more adequate in this population.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of this study is to provide information on the parthenogenetic Artemia populations in some hypersaline lakes ofAnatolia (Tuz, Bolluk, Tersakan, and Acıgöl). Sampling studies were performed for abiotic factors and population parameters betweenNovember 2009 and October 2010. During the survey we focused on the local Artemia populations to investigate population dynamics,reproduction, brood size, and cyst and naupliar biometrics. Generally, the Artemia habitats in Anatolia were relatively shallow, and thusthey were subject to major seasonal fluctuations. Dramatic declines in population size in Tuz and Acıgöl Lakes were found during thisstudy. All Artemia populations were parthenogenetic and brood sizes of females showed significant differences among the populations(P < 0.05). The largest brood size was observed in the Acıgöl population and it may be concluded that local conditions for reproductivesuccess were more adequate in this population. Substantial differences among populations were revealed during the studies on cystand naupliar biometry. Cyst diameter mean values ranged from 231.8 to 266.9 µm. The cyst diameters for the Acıgöl population aredetermined as the smallest in these populations and among the smallest values recorded in parthenogenetic populations. The totallength of newly hatched nauplii ranged from 484 to 512 µm for these populations.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYGI, Y., ESKANDARİ, A. (2022). Ecological surveys on the parthenogenetic Artemia populations in the hypersaline lakes of Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 367–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/616082

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abatzopoulos TJ, Agh N, Van Stappen G, Razavi Rouhani SV, Sorgeloos P (2006). Artemia sites in Iran. Journal of Marine Biological Association of the UK 86: 299-307.
  2. Abatzopoulos TJ, Karamanlidis G, Leger P, Sorgeloos P (1989). Further characterization of two Artemia populations from Northern Greece: biometry, hatching characteristics, caloric content and fatty acid profiles. Hydrobiologia 179: 211-222.
  3. Arashkevich EG, Sapozhnikov PV, Soloviov KA, Kudyshkin TV, Zavialov PO (2009). Artemia parthenogenetica (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) from the Large Aral Sea: abundance, distribution, population structure and cyst production. Journal of Marine System 76: 359-366.
  4. Başbuğ Y, Demirkalp FY (1997). A note on the brine shrimp Artemia in Tuz Lake (Turkey). Hydrobiologia 353: 45-51. Başbuğ Y (1999a). Tuz Gölü’nde yaşayan Artemia salina (L., 1758)’nın bazı biyolojik özellikleri. Turkish Journal of Zoology 23 (2): 617-624 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Başbuğ Y (1999b). Tuz Gölü’nde yaşayan Artemia salina (L., 1758)’nın üreme özellikleri. Turkish Journal of Zoology 23 (2): 635-640 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Baxevanis AD, Kappas I, Abatzopoulos TJ (2006). Molecular phylogenetic and asexuality in the brine shrimp Artemia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 724-738.
  5. Browne RA, Sallee SE, Grosch DS, Segreti WO, Purser SM (1984). Partitioning genetic and environmental components of reproduction and life-span in Artemia. Ecology 65: 949-960.
  6. Browne R, Wanigasekera G (2000). Combined effects of salinity and temperature on survival and reproduction of five species of Artemia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 244: 29-44.
  7. Clegg JS, Trotman C (2002). Physiological and biochemical aspects of Artemia ecology. In: Abatzopoulos TJ, Beardmore JA, Clegg JS, Sorgeloos P (editors). Artemia Basic and Applied Biology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 129-170.
  8. Cole GA, Brown RJ (1967). The chemistry of Artemia habitats. Ecology 48: 858-861.
  9. Criel GR, Macrae TH (2002). Reproductive biology of Artemia. In: Abatzopoulos TJ, Beardmore JA, Clegg JS, Sorgeloos P (editors). Artemia Basic and Applied Biology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 39-128.
  10. Gajardo G, Abatzopoulos TJ, Kappas I, Beardmore JA (2002). Evolution and speciation. In: Abatzopoulos TJ, Beardmore JA, Clegg JS, Sorgeloos P (editors). Artemia Basic and Applied Biology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 225-2