Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

Evolutionary analyses of phylum Chaetognatha based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene

Pages
508–518
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Precise phylogenetic investigations using various molecular markers and specimens from diverse regions are definitely needed to provide an exact evolutionary concept on this phylum.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Chaetognaths (arrow worms) are an enigmatic group of transparent planktonic invertebrates and play an important role in the marine food web.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Their morphological and developmental features have raised extensive debates since the discovery of the phylum in the 18th century.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Precise phylogenetic investigations using various molecular markers and specimens from diverse regions are definitely needed to provide an exact evolutionary concept on this phylum.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Chaetognaths (arrow worms) are an enigmatic group of transparent planktonic invertebrates and play an important role in the marine food web. Their morphological and developmental features have raised extensive debates since the discovery of the phylum in the 18th century. Uncertainty in the phylogenetic placement of certain chaetognath species still exists and is puzzling many scientists who have tried to clarify this task. Studies using a portion of both small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid (SSU rRNA) and large subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid (LSU rRNA) genes when integrated with conventional taxonomy were contributed to resolve taxonomical issues in this group. Here we present the first phylogenetic study of Chaetognatha based on a portion of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene and compare our results with the earlier morphological and molecular evolutionary hypotheses. This study includes 16 extant species, representing 8 genera and 6 of which are among the 9 extant families. We recommend the following clade structure for the phylum: Aphragmophora comprising Sagittidae with Pterosagittidae and Krohnittidae included in the Sagittidae and Phragmophora comprising Eukrohniidae, Spadellidae, and Heterokrohniidae. Phylogenetic analyses also supported the division of Phragmophora into two monophyletic groups: the Monophragmophora and Biphragmophora. Moreover, Ctenodontina/Flabellodontina and Syngonata/Chorismogonata suborders were not validated. Precise phylogenetic investigations using various molecular markers and specimens from diverse regions are definitely needed to provide an exact evolutionary concept on this phylum.

🔖

Cite This Article

PİLLAİ, D., PETER, S., NAİR, M. K. B. (2022). Evolutionary analyses of phylum Chaetognatha based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 508–518. https://ajindex.com/articles/615974

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Abdelaziz AR, Khalafalla RE, Hassan AAA, Elmahallawy EK, Almuzaini AM (2019). Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Cysticercus ovis from Egypt based on MT-CO1 gene sequences. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária 28 (2): 258-265. doi: 10.1590/S1984-29612019028 Bieri R (1991a). Six new genera in the chaetognath family Sagittidae. Gulf and Caribbean Research 8 (3): 221-225. Bieri R (1991b). Systematics of the Chaetognatha. In: Bone Q, Kapp H, Pierrot-Bults AC (editors). The Biology of Chaetognaths.1st ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp.122-136.
  2. Bucklin A, Ortman BD, Jennings RM, Nigro L, Sweetman CJ et al. (2010). A ‘‘Rosetta Stone’’ for zooplankton: DNA barcode analysis of holozooplankton diversity of the Sargasso Sea (NW Atlantic Ocean). Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 57 (24-26): 2234-2247. doi: 10.1016/j. dsr2.2010.09.025 Casanova JP (1985). Description de l’appareil génital primitif du genre Heterokrohnia et nouvelle classification des Chaetognathes. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences-Série III-Sciences de la Vie 301 (8): 397-402 (in French). Casanova JP (1996). A new genus and species of deep-benthic chaetognath from the Atlantic: a probable link between the families Heterokrohniidae and Spadellidae. Journal of Natural History 30 (8): 1239-1245. doi: 10.1080/00222939600770671 De Mandal S, Chhakchhuak L, Gurusubramanian G, Kumar NS (2014). Mitochondrial markers for identification and phylogenetic studies in insects–A Review. DNA Barcodes 2 (1): 1-9. doi: 10.2478/dna-2014-0001
  3. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994). DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3 (5): 294-299.
  4. Gasmi S, Nve G, Pech N, Tekaya S, Gilles A et al. (2014). Evolutionary history of Chaetognatha inferred from molecular and morphological data: A case study for body plan simplification. Frontiers in zoology 11 (1): 84. doi: 10.1186/s12983-014-0084-7
  5. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W et al. (2010). New algorithms and methods to estimate maximumlikelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59 (3): 307-321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 Hall BG (2013). Building phylogenetic trees from molecular data with MEGA. Molecular biology and evolution 30 (5): 1229-1235. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst012 Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological seq