Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

Evolutionary analyses of phylum Chaetognatha based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene

Pages
508–518
Publication Date
2020-11-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Precise phylogenetic investigations using various molecular markers and specimens from diverse regions are definitely needed to provide an exact evolutionary concept on this phylum.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Chaetognaths (arrow worms) are an enigmatic group of transparent planktonic invertebrates and play an important role in the marine food web.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Their morphological and developmental features have raised extensive debates since the discovery of the phylum in the 18th century.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Precise phylogenetic investigations using various molecular markers and specimens from diverse regions are definitely needed to provide an exact evolutionary concept on this phylum.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Chaetognatha · evolution · phylogenetic analysis

Abstract

Chaetognaths (arrow worms) are an enigmatic group of transparent planktonic invertebrates and play an important role in the marine food web. Their morphological and developmental features have raised extensive debates since the discovery of the phylum in the 18th century. Uncertainty in the phylogenetic placement of certain chaetognath species still exists and is puzzling many scientists who have tried to clarify this task. Studies using a portion of both small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid (SSU rRNA) and large subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid (LSU rRNA) genes when integrated with conventional taxonomy were contributed to resolve taxonomical issues in this group. Here we present the first phylogenetic study of Chaetognatha based on a portion of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene and compare our results with the earlier morphological and molecular evolutionary hypotheses. This study includes 16 extant species, representing 8 genera and 6 of which are among the 9 extant families. We recommend the following clade structure for the phylum: Aphragmophora comprising Sagittidae with Pterosagittidae and Krohnittidae included in the Sagittidae and Phragmophora comprising Eukrohniidae, Spadellidae, and Heterokrohniidae. Phylogenetic analyses also supported the division of Phragmophora into two monophyletic groups: the Monophragmophora and Biphragmophora. Moreover, Ctenodontina/Flabellodontina and Syngonata/Chorismogonata suborders were not validated. Precise phylogenetic investigations using various molecular markers and specimens from diverse regions are definitely needed to provide an exact evolutionary concept on this phylum.

🔖

Cite This Article

PETER, S., NAİR, M. K. B., PİLLAİ, D. (2020). Evolutionary analyses of phylum Chaetognatha based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 508–518. https://ajindex.com/articles/200188

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Abdelaziz AR, 2019, REV BRAS PARASITOL V, V28, P258, DOI [10.1590/S1984-29612019028, 10.1590/s1984-29612019028] BIERI R, 1991, Gulf Research Reports, V8, P221 BIERI R, 1991, P122. Bucklin A, 2010, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V57, P2234, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.09.025 Minh BQ, 2013, MOL BIOL EVOL, V30, P1188, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mst024 Casanova JP, 1996, J NAT HIST, V30, P1239, DOI 10.1080/00222939600770671 CASANOVA JP, 1985, CR ACAD SCI III-VIE, V301, P397 Hoang DT, 2018, MOL BIOL EVOL, V35, P518, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msx281 Folmer O., 1994, Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, V3, P294 Gasmi S, 2014, FRONT ZOOL, V11, DOI 10.1186/s12983-014-0084-7 Guindon S, 2010, SYST BIOL, V59, P307, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 Hall BG, 2013, MOL BIOL EVOL, V30, P1229, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mst012 Hall TA., 1999, NUCL ACIDS S SER, V41, P95 Harzsch S, 2009,
  2. ZOOMORPHOLOGY, V128, P53, DOI 10.1007/s00435-008-0074-4 HILLIS DM, 1993, SYST BIOL, V42, P182, DOI 10.2307/2992540 Huang ZH, 2018, MITOCHONDRIAL DNA A, V29, P529, DOI 10.1080/24701394.2017.1315569 Hyman LH, 1959,
  3. INVERTEBRATES, V5, P1. Jennings RM, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009949 Kumar S, 2018, MOL BIOL EVOL, V35, P1547, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msy096 Mandal S. D., 2014, DNA BARCODES, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.2478/dna-2014-0001 MILLER SA, 1988, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V16, P1215, DOI 10.1093/nar/16.3.1215 Miyamoto H, 2014, J PLANKTON RES, V36, P816, DOI 10.1093/plankt/fbu001 Nair V.R., 1973, P293. Nair V.R., 1973, P319. Nair VR, 2015, INDIAN J GEO-MAR SCI, V44, P1366 Nair VR, 2015, MAR BIOL RES, V11, P269, DOI 10.1080/17451000.2014.914224 Nair VR, 1972, CHAETOGNATHS ARABIAN. Nielsen C, 2012, ANIMAL EVOLUTION: INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF THE LIVING PHYLA, 3RD EDITION, P1 Nylander J., 2008, MRMODELTEST2 V 2 3 P. PAMILO P, 1988, MOL BIOL EVOL, V5, P568. Papillon D, 2006, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V38, P621, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.12.004 Perez Y, 2014, DEEP METAZOAN PHYLOGENY: THE BACKBONE OF THE TREE OF LIFE, P49 Peter S, 2016, INT J FISH AQUAT STU, V4, P30 Ptaszynska AA, 2012, J INSECT SCI, V12, DOI 10.1673/031.012.1601 Raupach MJ, 2019, DEUT ENTOMOL Z, V66, P63, DOI 10.3897/dez.66.34711 Ritter-Zahony Rudolf von, 1911. Ronquist F, 2012, SYST BIOL, V61, P539, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 Shimodaira H, 1999, MOL BIOL EVOL, V16, P1114, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201 Srinivasan M., 1972, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, V13, P173 Srinivasan M., 1972, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of In