Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

The effects of three different prokinetic drugs on the motility hormones level in lambs with postoperative ileus

Pages
435–440
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, erythromycin and lidocaine was thought to be useful in lambs with POI according to the stimulatory effects onthe motility hormones.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the three different prokinetic agents, namely erythromycin, lidocaine,and metoclopramide in lambs with postoperative ileus (POI) using motilin and ghrelin, which are known as motility markers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twentylambs were allocated to 4 groups of 5 lambs each.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, erythromycin and lidocaine was thought to be useful in lambs with POI according to the stimulatory effects onthe motility hormones.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the three different prokinetic agents, namely erythromycin, lidocaine,and metoclopramide in lambs with postoperative ileus (POI) using motilin and ghrelin, which are known as motility markers. Twentylambs were allocated to 4 groups of 5 lambs each. An enterotomy was performed on the ileum of each lamb. Erythromycin (8.8 mg/kg), metoclopramide (0.2 mg/kg), and saline (2 mL) were administered as single dose IM before surgery in the ERT, MET, and CNTRgroups, respectively. Lidocaine was administered to the LID group, both as a bolus before (1.3 mg/kg IV) and as a continuous rateinfusion during surgery (0.05 mg/kg/h IV). Serum motilin and ghrelin concentrations as motility hormones were measured with ELISA.The serum motilin concentration was significantly higher at 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 24, and 48 h in the ERT group and at 1 and 10 h in the LIDgroup. The serum ghrelin concentration was significantly higher at 0, 1, and 48 h in the ERT group and at 3, 5, 10, 24, and 48 h in theLID group. As a result, erythromycin and lidocaine was thought to be useful in lambs with POI according to the stimulatory effects onthe motility hormones.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTAN, S., DÖNMEZ, K., ALTAN, F., ALKAN, F. (2022). The effects of three different prokinetic drugs on the motility hormones level in lambs with postoperative ileus. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 435–440. https://ajindex.com/articles/614924

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Koening J, Cote N. Equine gastrointestinal motility-ileus and pharmacological modification. Can Vet J 2006; 47: 551-559
  2. Boeckxstaens GE, de Jonge WJ. Neuroimmune mechanisms in postoperative ileus. Gut 2009; 58: 1300-1311
  3. Desrochers A, Anderson DE. Intestinal surgery. Vet Clin N Am-Food A 2016; 32: 645-671
  4. Reynolds JC. Prokinetic agents: a key in the future gastroenterology. Gastroenterol Clin N 1989; 18: 437-457
  5. Dowling PM. Prokinetic drugs: metoclopramide and cisapride. Can Vet J 1995; 36: 115-116
  6. Avau B, Carbone F, Tack J, Depoortere I. Ghrelin signaling in the gut, its physiological properties, and therapeutic potential. Neurogastroent Motil 2013; 25: 720-732
  7. Ohno T, Mochiki E, Kuwano H. The roles of motilin and ghrelin in gastrointestinal motility. International Journal of Peptides 2010; 820794:1-6
  8. Ozturk AS, Guzel M, Askar TK, Aytekin I. Evaluation of the hormones responsible for the gastrointestinal motility in cattle with displacement of the abomasum; ghrelin, motilin and gastrin. Vet Rec 2013; 172: 636
  9. De Smet B, Mitselos A, Depoortere I. Motilin and ghrelin as prokinetic drug targets. Pharmacol Therapeut 2009; 123: 207- 223
  10. Lee SP, Lee OY, Lee KN, Lee HL, Choi HS, Yoon BC, Jun DW. Effect of DA-9701, a novel prokinetic agent, on post-operative ileus in rats. J Neurogastroent Motil 2017; 23: 109-116
  11. El-Salhy M. Ghrelin in gastrointestinal diseases and disorders: A possible role in the pathophysiology and clinical implications (Review). Int J Mol Med 2009; 24: 727-732
  12. Van Hoogmoed LM, Nieto JE, Snyder JR, Harmon FA. Survey of prokinetic use in horses with gastrointestinal injury. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 279-285
  13. Malone E, Ensink J, Turner T, Wilson J, Andrews F, Keegan K, Lumsden J. Intravenous continuous infusion of lidocaine for treatment of equine ileus. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 60-66
  14. Huhn JC, Nelson DR. The quantitative effect of metoclopramide on abomasal and duodenal myoelectric activity of goats. ZBL Vet Med A 1997; 44: 361-371
  15. Constable PD, Nouri M, Sen I, Baird AN, Wittek T. Evidencebased use of prokinetic drugs for abomasal disorders in cattle. Vet Clin N Am-Food A 2012; 28: 51-70
  16. Lohmann K, Roussel AJ, Cohen ND, Boothe DM, Rakestraw PC, Walker MA. Comparison of nuclear scintigraphy and acetaminophen absorption as a means of studying gastric emptying in horses. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61: 310-315
  17. Steiner A. Modifiers of gastrointestinal motility of cattle. Vet Clin N Am-Food A 2003;