Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3

Comparative detection of bovine herpesvirus-1 using antigen ELISA, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence methods in cattle with pneumonia

Pages
306–313
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, it has been observed that when IF method is not available, IHC is more reliable thanantigen ELISA in the diagnosis of BoHV-1.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to detect the prevalence and presence of bovine herpesvirus-1 (BoHV-1) using immunohistochemistry(IHC), immunofluorescence (IF) and antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the lung samples of cattle (n = 1023).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inaddition, three methods were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and chi-square test (χ2 test), and their usabilitywere evaluated in laboratory conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, it has been observed that when IF method is not available, IHC is more reliable thanantigen ELISA in the diagnosis of BoHV-1.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was conducted to detect the prevalence and presence of bovine herpesvirus-1 (BoHV-1) using immunohistochemistry(IHC), immunofluorescence (IF) and antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the lung samples of cattle (n = 1023). Inaddition, three methods were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and chi-square test (χ2 test), and their usabilitywere evaluated in laboratory conditions. Macroscopically, pneumonia was seen in 120 of the lung tissue samples (11.73%). Basedon the microscopic examinations, the pneumonia types were classified as catarrhal-suppurative bronchopneumonia (6.7%), fibrinousbronchopneumonia (5%), interstitial pneumonia (84.1%), and granulomatous pneumonia (4.2%). The IHC, IF and antigen ELISApositivity were 48.33%, 50.83%, and 29.9%, respectively. Considering IF as a gold standard, IHC had more acceptable sensitivity andspecificity than antigen ELISA. In conclusion, it has been observed that when IF method is not available, IHC is more reliable thanantigen ELISA in the diagnosis of BoHV-1.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİMURKAN, M. Ö., SaĞLAM, Y. S., ÇOMAKLI, S. (2022). Comparative detection of bovine herpesvirus-1 using antigen ELISA, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence methods in cattle with pneumonia. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 306–313. https://ajindex.com/articles/614880

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hartel H, Nikunen S, Neuvonen E, Tanskanen R, Kivela SL, Aho R, Soveri T, Saloniemi H. Viral and bacterial pathogens in bovine respiratory disease in Finland. Acta Vet Scand 2004; 45: 193-200
  2. EL-Bayoumy MK AK, Elgayed SS, Allam AM, Taha SS. Antiviral competence of broad-spectrum antiinfective drug artesunate against Bovine Herpesvirus-1. International Journal of Basic and Applied Virology 2013; 2: 6-13
  3. López A. Respiratory system. In: McGavin MD, Zachary JF, editors. Pathologic Basis of Veterinary Disease. 4th ed. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. pp. 463- 473
  4. Griffin D, Chengappa M, Kuszak J, McVey DS. Bacterial pathogens of the bovine respiratory disease complex. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2010; 26: 381-394
  5. O’Neill R, Mooney J, Connaghan E, Furphy C, Graham D. Patterns of detection of respiratory viruses in nasal swabs from calves in Ireland: a retrospective study. Vet Rec 2014; 175: 351- 351
  6. Horwood PF, Mahony TJ. Multiplex real-time RT-PCR detection of three viruses associated with the bovine respiratory disease complex. J Virol Methods. 2011; 171: 360-363
  7. Mosier D. Review of BRD pathogenesis: the old and the new. Anim Health Res Rev 2014; 15: 166-168
  8. Jain L. Detection of bovine herpes virus-1 (BHV-1) infection in breeding bulls by serological and molecular methods and its characterization by sequencing of PCR products. Msc, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry Anand Agricultural University, Anand, India, 2006
  9. Surendra K, Rana S, Subramanian B, Reddy R, Sharma G, Srinivasan V. Phylogenetic analysis of bovine herpesvirus isolate of India. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2015; 3: 451-460
  10. Engels M, Ackermann M. Pathogenesis of ruminant herpesvirus infections. Vet Microbiol 1996; 53: 3-15
  11. Nandi S, Kumar M, Manohar M, Chauhan R. Bovine herpes virus infections in cattle. Anim Health Res Rev 2009; 10: 85-98
  12. Muylkens B, Thiry J, Kirten P, Schynts F, Thiry E. Bovine herpesvirus 1 infection and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis. Vet Res 2007; 38: 181-209
  13. Biswas S, Bandyopadhyay S, Dimri U, H. Patra P. Bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) are emerging concern in livestock: a revisit to its biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and prophylaxis. Vet Q 2013; 33: 68-81
  14. Moore S, Gunn M, Walls D. A rapid and sensitive PCR-based diagnostic assay to detect bovine herpesvirus 1 in routine diagnostic submissions. Vet Microbiol 2000; 75: 145-153
  15. Turin L, Russo S, Po