Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

A Review on Cross Cultural Education throughout Europe: Identity Issues

Pages
109–125
Publication Date
2018-04-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The discussions presented and their implications are meant to contribute to improving the educational contexts for exchange students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The past few decades have witnessed an increase in global mobility and an unprecedented number of exchange programs offered by various institutions and governments to enable students to receive education in foreign countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The increase in the enrolment rates of international and exchange students has led many countries to reform their educational systems at curricular and practical levels to meet the needs of international students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The discussions presented and their implications are meant to contribute to improving the educational contexts for exchange students.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Exchange programs · intercultural education · identity issues

Özet

Öz The past few decades have witnessed an increase in global mobility and an unprecedented number of exchange programs offered by various institutions and governments to enable students to receive education in foreign countries. The increase in the enrolment rates of international and exchange students has led many countries to reform their educational systems at curricular and practical levels to meet the needs of international students. European Council (2001), for instance, has developed a common framework of reference to enable students across Europe to travel for education with the hope of creating a common European identity. However, institutional reports and research findings show that in spite of the increasing opportunities and attempts to improve information and funding services to accommodate the needs of international students, the effectiveness of cross cultural education can be questioned. Among these predicaments, identity issues have been frequently reported (e.g., Andrade, 2006; Ho, 2009; Kuhn, 2012; Kim, 2014). In this respect, the present study aims to provide a review of recent studies and reports by focusing specifically on identity problems encountered by exchange students. The discussions presented and their implications are meant to contribute to improving the educational contexts for exchange students.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKER, M. (2018). A Review on Cross Cultural Education throughout Europe: Identity Issues. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 109–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/6146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Jacob, E. J. & Greggo, J. W. (2001). Using counselor training and collaborative programming strategies in working with international students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 29(1), 73-88.
  2. Cısdık, Z. K. (2014) Exploring the changes in Turkish university students’ language learning beliefs as a result of ‘erasmus student mobility for studies programme’[Erasmus değişim programı sonrasında Türk üniversite öğrencilerinin dil öğrenme algılarındaki değişimlerin incelenmesi]. M.A. Thesis, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey. Kim, H. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An ıntegrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. CA: Thousand Oaks. Kim, H. Y. (2001). Learner investment, identity, and resistance to second language pragmatic norms. System, 45, 92-102.
  3. Althen, G. (1994). Recurring issues in intercultural communication. In G. Althen (Ed.), Learning across Cultures (pp. 189-190).
  4. Washington, DC: NAFSA. Kuhn, T. (2012). Europa ante Portas: Border residence, transnational ınteraction and Euroscepticism in Germany and France. European Union Politics, 13(1). 94-117.
  5. Lee, D. (1997). What teachers can do to relieve problems identified by international students? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 70, 93-100.
  6. Lewthwaite, M. (1996). A study of international students’ perspectives on cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 19(2), 167-185.
  7. Marks, G. (1999). Territorial identities in the European Union. Oxford: oxford University Press.
  8. Marshall, E. (2005). Cash-short schools aim to raise fees, recruit foreign students. Science, 307 (5710), 656. Fichte, J. G. (1968). Addresses to the German Nation. New York: Harper. Mather, J. (2006). Legitimating the European Union: Aspirations, inputs and performance. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. NAFSA (Association of International Educators) (2003). In America’s interest: Welcoming international students. Report of the strategic task force on international student access, Retrieved from http://www.nafsa.org/content/ PublicPolicy/stf/stf.htm, [Accessed 26.11. 2014].
  9. Colebatch, T. (2005). Foreign students settle. Retrieved from http://www.theage.com.au /news/Immigration/ Foreign-students- settle/2005/01/21/ 1106110942999.html [Accessed: 01.12.2008].
  10. Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guide book. California: Sage Publications Inc. Peterson, D.M., Briggs, P., Dreasher, L., Horner, D. D. & Nelson, T. (1999). Contributions of international student