Journals / Turkish journal of vascular surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

What is the benefit of venous mapping in saphenous vein harvesting?

Pages
86–90
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, we think that the vein mapping method should be used routinely, particularly in the group of patients who have risk factors for incision line complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aimed to demonstrate that the use of the vein mapping technique before coronary artery bypass surgeries can reduce postoperative complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: A total of 245 patients (181 males, 64 females; mean age: 64.6±9.4 years; range, 43 to 85 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Başkent University Ankara Hospital between April 2019 and September 2020 were enrolled in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, we think that the vein mapping method should be used routinely, particularly in the group of patients who have risk factors for incision line complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to demonstrate that the use of the vein mapping technique before coronary artery bypass surgeries can reduce postoperative complications. Patients and methods: A total of 245 patients (181 males, 64 females; mean age: 64.6±9.4 years; range, 43 to 85 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Başkent University Ankara Hospital between April 2019 and September 2020 were enrolled in this study. Patients with early postoperative mortality (first month), deep vein thrombosis, or a history of lymphedema, patients undergoing emergent surgery, and reoperation cases were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups: 109 patients (mean age: 64.5±8.9 years) who were treated by the conventional method (CM group) and 136 patients (mean age: 64.7±9.5 years) who were treated with the venous mapping technique (VM group). Of the patients in the VM group, 46 (mean age: 65.0±9.2 years) were treated using LigaSure (VML group), and 93 (mean age: 64.6±9.7 years) were not treated with LigaSure (IVM group). The patients were followed up for three months for the development of ecchymosis, hematoma, and superficial and deep tissue infections. Results: There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of sex (p=0.953). There was no statistical difference between the four groups in terms of risk factors for infection determined in the literature. Incision line complications developed in 42 (38.53%) patients in the CM group, 30 (22.05%) in the VM group, 22 (23.65%) in the IVM group, and eight (18.6%) patients in the VML group. While all groups were statistically superior to the CM group in terms of complications, no significant difference was found between the IVM and VML groups in terms of these complications. Conclusion: Vein mapping technique performed with Doppler ultrasonography in the operating room is a fast, reliable, easily accessible, and low-cost procedure, allowing a significant reduction in the complication rates associated with the saphenous vein incision line. Therefore, we think that the vein mapping method should be used routinely, particularly in the group of patients who have risk factors for incision line complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZGİN, A., AKAY, H. T., BEYAZPINAR, D. S., ŞEREFLİ, D., GÜNERTEM, O. E., GÜLTEKİN, B., BALLA, E. (2022). What is the benefit of venous mapping in saphenous vein harvesting?. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 86–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/614489

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Skapinakis P, Perunovic B, Hart J, Crossman MC, et al. Leg wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus conventional vein harvesting. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:2141-6
  2. Carpino PA, Khabbaz KR, Bojar RM, Rastegar H, Warner KG, Murphy RE, et al. Clinical benefits of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients with risk factors for saphenectomy wound infections undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:69-75
  3. Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, Langlois Y, Austin TW, Willoughby A, et al. A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:204-12
  4. L'Ecuyer PB, Murphy D, Little JR, Fraser VJ. The epidemiology of chest and leg wound infections following cardiothoracic surgery. Clin Infect Dis 1996;22:424-9
  5. DeLaria GA, Hunter JA, Goldin MD, Serry C, Javid H, Najafi H. Leg wound complications associated with coronary revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;81:403-7
  6. Wengrovitz M, Atnip RG, Gifford RR, Neumyer MM, Heitjan DF, Thiele BL. Wound complications of autogenous subcutaneous infrainguinal arterial bypass surgery: Predisposing factors and management. J Vasc Surg 1990;11:156-61
  7. Allen KB. Saphenectomy wound complications: The real story. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1535
  8. Lopes FC, Oliveira OWB, Moreira DG, Santos MAD, Oliveira JLR, Cruz CB, et al. Use of Doppler ultrasound for saphenous vein mapping to obtain grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2018;33:189-93
  9. Olsen MA, Sundt TM, Lawton JS, Damiano RJ Jr, Hopkins-Broyles D, Lock-Buckley P, et al. Risk factors for leg harvest surgical site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:992-9
  10. Luckraz H, Lowe J, Pugh N, Azzu AA. Pre-operative long saphenous vein mapping predicts vein anatomy and quality leading to improved post-operative leg morbidity. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:188-91
  11. Temizkan V, Ugur M, Arslan G, Alp I, Yedekci E, Ucak A, et al. Comparison of conventional technique and ultrasonographic mapping in saphenous vein harvesting. Heart Surg Forum 2013;16:E248-51
  12. Sarzaeem MR, Mandegar MH, Roshanali F, Vedadian A, Saidi B, Alaeddini F, et al. Scoring system for predicting saphenous vein graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting. Tex Heart I