Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2018 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Choosing the appropriate size of Amplatz sheath during percutaneous nephrolithotomy- a novel method

Perkütan nefrolitotomi sırasında uygun kalibrede Amplatz kılıfının seçimi-yeni bir yöntem

Pages
138–141
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no intraoperative pelvic wall or infundibular injury.Conclusion: Choosing correct size of Amplatz sheath lowers the incidence of kidney hemorrhage and renalfunction impairment

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To choose appropriate size Amplatz sheath during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) basedon retrograde pyelogram.Material and methods: We performed standard PCNL in prone position in 20 patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The preoperative and postoperative renal parameters, hemoglobin,mean operating time and mean hospitalisation stay were measured.Results: There was no significant difference between the pre-operative and postoperative hemoglobin andcreatinine levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no intraoperative pelvic wall or infundibular injury.Conclusion: Choosing correct size of Amplatz sheath lowers the incidence of kidney hemorrhage and renalfunction impairment
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To choose appropriate size Amplatz sheath during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) basedon retrograde pyelogram.Material and methods: We performed standard PCNL in prone position in 20 patients. All these patientshad placement of appropriate size of Amplatz sheath based on retrograde pyelogram images. All patientshad nephrostomy tubes postoperatively. The preoperative and postoperative renal parameters, hemoglobin,mean operating time and mean hospitalisation stay were measured.Results: There was no significant difference between the pre-operative and postoperative hemoglobin andcreatinine levels. Median operating time was 60.5 mins (45 to 98 mins). The median hospitalisation stay was4.6 days (3 to 7 days). There was no intraoperative pelvic wall or infundibular injury.Conclusion: Choosing correct size of Amplatz sheath lowers the incidence of kidney hemorrhage and renalfunction impairment

Özet

Amaç: Perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL) sırasında kullanılmak üzere retrograd piyelograma dayanarak uygun kalibrede Amplatz kılıfı seçmek. Gereç ve yöntemler: Yirmi hastaya yüzükoyun yatar pozisyonda standart PNL uyguladık. Bu hastaların tümüne retrograd piyelogram görüntülerine bakarak uygun kalibrede Amplatz kılıfı yerleştirildi. Hastaların hepsinde postoperatif dönemde nefrostomi tüpleri mevcuttu. Preoperatif ve postoperatif parametreler, hemoglobin düzeyleri, ortalama ameliyat süresi ve hastanede yatış süresi ölçülmüştü. Bulgular: Preoperatif ve postoperatif hemoglobin ve kreatinin düzeyleri arasında herhangi bir anlamlı farklılık yoktu. Ortalama ameliyat süresi 60,5 dakika (45-98 dakika); ortalama hastanede yatış süresi 4,6 gün (3-7 gün) idi. İntraoperatif pelvis duvarı veya infundibulum hasarı yoktu. Sonuç: Doğru kalibrede Amplatz kılıf seçimi böbrek kanaması ve böbrek fonksiyon bozukluğu insidansını düşürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

THİRUGNANASAMBANDAM, V., DAVİD, D., KONE, K., PHİLİPRAJ, J., MOSSADEQ, A. (2022). Choosing the appropriate size of Amplatz sheath during percutaneous nephrolithotomy- a novel method. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 138–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/614397

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Cormio L, Preminger G, Saussine C, Buchholz NP, Zhang X, Wal-fridsson H, et al. Nephrostomy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): does nephrostomy tube size matter? Results from The Global PCNL Study from The Clinical Research Office Endourol-ogy Society. World J Urol 2013;31:1563-8. [CrossRef] 2. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithoto-my. A new ex-traction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10:257-9. [CrossRef] 3. De Sio M, Autorino R, Quattrone C, Giugliano F, Balsamo R, D’Armiento M. Choosing the nephrostomy size after percutaneous nephrolithotmy. World J Urol 2011;29:707-11. [CrossRef] 4. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, Mhaskar SS, Wani KA, Patel SH, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of type of neph-rostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 2004;172:565-7. [CrossRef] 5. Shah HN, Sodha HS, Khandkar AA, Kharodawala S, Hegde SS, Bansal MB. A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore v tube-less. J Endourol 2008;22:1433-9. [CrossRef] 6. Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR, Walmsley BH. A random-ized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2008;180:612-4. [CrossRef] 7. Limb J, Bellman GC. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery: review of first 112 patients. Urology 2002;59:527-31. [CrossRef] 8. Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR, Walmsley BH. To-tally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2008;22:267-71. [CrossRef] 9. Karakose A, Aydogdu O, Atesci YZ. Does the use of smaller Am-platz sheath size reduce complication rates in percutaneous neph-rolithotomy? Urol J 2014;11:1752-6.