Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2017 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

Safety and efficacy of bipolar energy for transurethral resection of bladder tumours: a prospective quasi-randomized study

Mesane tümörlerinin transüretral rezeksiyonunda bipolar enerjinin güvenlilik ve etkinliği: prospektif yarı-randomize bir çalışma

Pages
141–146
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

BipolarTURBT is safe and efficacious in managing bladder tumours

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bipolar energy in resectingbladder tumors.Material and methods: The study was done between March 2012 and February 2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were randomized into two groups of 50 each to undergo either monopolarTURBT or bipolar TURBT using glycine and saline irrigation solutions, respectively.Results: Most important of all, the means of variables were compared between the two energy sources toknow the difference between them and its significance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:BipolarTURBT is safe and efficacious in managing bladder tumours
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bipolar energy in resectingbladder tumors.Material and methods: The study was done between March 2012 and February 2013. This is a prospectivequasi-randomized study evaluating the safety and efficacy of bipolar energy in transurethral resection ofbladder tumours (TURBT). Institutional Ethics Committee approval was obtained. Informed consent wastaken from all patients. Patients were randomized into two groups of 50 each to undergo either monopolarTURBT or bipolar TURBT using glycine and saline irrigation solutions, respectively.Results: Most important of all, the means of variables were compared between the two energy sources toknow the difference between them and its significance. Hematocrit level, resection time and obturator jerkshad significant values.Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that bipolar resection of bladder tumours have lower incidenceof complications especially bleeding, TUR syndrome, obturator jerks and bladder perforation. BipolarTURBT is safe and efficacious in managing bladder tumours

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın birincil amacı mesane tümörlerinin rezeksiyonunda bipolar enerjinin güvenlilik ve etkinliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve yöntemler: Çalışma Mart 2012 ile Şubat 2013 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışma, mesane tümörlerinin transüretral rezeksiyonunda (TURMT) bipolar enerjiyi değerlendiren yarı-randomize prospektif bir çalışmadır. Kurumsal etik komite onayı ve hastaların hepsinden bilgilendirilmiş onam formu alınmıştır. Hastalar monopolar TURMT (n=50) veya bipolar TURMT (n=50) olmak üzere iki gruba randomize edilmiştir. Hastalara glisin kullanılarak monopolar TURMT veya salin kullanılarak bipolar TURMT uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Her şeyden önemlisi, aradaki farklılığı ve bu farklılığın anlamını bilmek için iki enerji kaynağı değişkenlerinin ortalamaları karşılaştırılmıştır. Hematokrit düzeyi, rezeksiyon süresi ve obturator refleks açısından anlamlı değerler elde edilmiştir. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre mesane tümörlerinin bipolar enerjiyle rezeksiyonu özellikle kanama, TUR sendromu, obturator refleks ve mesane perforasyonu dahil olmak üzere daha düşük komplikasyon insidansına sahiptir. Bipolar TURMT mesane tümörlerinin tedavisinde güvenli ve etkindir.

🔖

Cite This Article

RAMANATHAN, J., THİRUGNANASAMBANDAM, V. (2022). Safety and efficacy of bipolar energy for transurethral resection of bladder tumours: a prospective quasi-randomized study. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 141–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/614441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Yang SJ, Song PH, Kim HT. Comparison of deep biopsy tissue damage from transurethral resection of bladder tumors between bipolar and monopolar devices. Korean J Urol 2011;52:379-83. [CrossRef] Wuand YL, Wang XH. Use of bipolar energy for transurethral resection of superficial bladder tumors: long-term results. J Endourol 2008;22:545-59. [CrossRef] McKiernan JM, Kaplan SA, Santarosa RP, Te AE, Sawczuk IS. Transurethral electrovaporization of bladder cancer. Urology 1996;48:207-10. [CrossRef] Hahn RG. Transurethral resection syndrome after transurethral resection of bladder tumours. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:69-72. [CrossRef] Soloway MS, Patel J. Surgical techniques for endoscopic resection of bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1992;19:467-71.
  2. Gupta NP, Saini AK, Dogra PN, Seth A, Kumar R. Bipolar energy for transurethral resection of bladder tumours at low-power settings: initial experience. BJU 2010;108:553-6. [CrossRef] Kihl B, Nilson AE, Pettersson S. Thigh adductor contraction during transurethral resection of bladder tumors: Evaluation of inactive electroplacement and obturator nerve topography. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1981;15:121-5. [CrossRef Akçayöz M, Kaygisiz O, Akdemir O, Aki FT, Adsan O, Cetinkaya M. Comparison of transurethral resection and plasma kinetic transurethral resection applications with regard to fluid absorption amounts in benign prostate hyperplasia. Urol Int 2006;77:143-7. [CrossRef] Pu XY, Wang HP, Zeltser I, Pearle MS, Bagley DH. Saline is our friend. Urology 2009;74:28-9. [CrossRef] Moody JA, Lingeman JE. Holmium laser enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gr: Comparison to open prostatectomy. J Urol 2001;165:459-62. [CrossRef] Beer E. Removal of neoplasms of the urinary bladder; a new method, employing high frequency (oudin) currents through a catheterizing cystoscope. JAMA 1910;54:1768-9. [CrossRef]