Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Laparoscopic partial cecum resection in appendiceal intussusception

Apendiks intususepsiyonunda laparoskopik parsiyel çekum rezeksiyonu

Pages
74–77
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Laparoscopic partial cecum resection, preserving the ileocecal valve, is an appropriate treatment approach in irreducible cases that are notsuspected to be malignant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Appendiceal intussusception (AI) is a difficult disease to diagnose.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Various features of the disease were analyzed in a 35-year-old female patient admitted with abdominal pain and diagnosed with AI.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Laparoscopic partial cecum resection, preserving the ileocecal valve, is an appropriate treatment approach in irreducible cases that are notsuspected to be malignant.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Appendiceal intussusception (AI) is a difficult disease to diagnose. Various features of the disease were analyzed in a 35-year-old female patient admitted with abdominal pain and diagnosed with AI. The diagnosis was made with colonoscopy and abdominal computed tomography. Laparoscopicpartial cecum resection was performed. Pathology examination revealed foci of endometriosis externa, which infiltrated the muscular layer of the appendix. AI should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of recurrent abdominal pain. Colonoscopy is an indispensable examination for differentialdiagnosis. Laparoscopic partial cecum resection, preserving the ileocecal valve, is an appropriate treatment approach in irreducible cases that are notsuspected to be malignant.

Özet

Apendiks intususepsiyonu klinik tanısı zor bir hastalıktır. Bu olgu sunumunda karın ağrısı nedeniyle başvuran ve apendiks intususepsiyonu tanısı ile tedavi edilen 35 yaşındaki kadın hasta vesilesiyle, hastalığın değişik yönleri incelenmiştir. Tanı kolonoskopi ve karın tomografisi ile konuldu. Laparoskopik parsiyel çekum rezeksiyonu uygulandı. Patolojik değerlendirmede apendiksin kas tabakasına infiltre olan endometriozis eksterna odakları tespit edildi. Apendiks intususepsiyonu tekrarlayıcı karın ağrısının ayırıcı tanısında düşünülmelidir. Kolonoskopi ayırıcı tanıya ulaşmada vazgeçilemez bir incelemedir. Redükte edilemeyen ve malignite şüphesi olmayan olgularda, ileoçekal valvi koruyarak laparoskopik parsiyel çekum rezeksiyonu uygun bir tedavi yaklaşımıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

buğra, D., bilgiç, Ç., zenger, S. (2022). Laparoscopic partial cecum resection in appendiceal intussusception. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 74–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/614353

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Langsam LB, Raj PK, Galang CF. Intussusception of the appendix. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27: 387-92
  2. Chaar CI, Wexelman B, Zuckerman K, Longo W. Intussusception of the appendix: comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Surg 2009; 198: 122-8
  3. McKidd J. Case of invagination of caecum and appendix. Edinburgh Med J 1858; 4: 793-7
  4. Collins D. Seventy one thousand human appendix specimens. A final report summarising forty years’ study. Am J Proctol 1963; 14: 356-81
  5. Moradi P, Barakate M, Gill A, Farrow G. Intussusception of the veriform appendix due to endometriosis presenting as acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 758-60
  6. Duncan JE, DeNobile JW, Sweeney WB. Colonoscopic diagnosis of appendiceal intussusception: case report and review of the literature. JSLS 2005; 9: 488-90
  7. Blondiaux E, Savoye-Collet C, Foulatier O, Lemoine F, Dacher JN. Appendiceal intussusception caused by a mucocele of the appendix: imaging findings. Digest Liver Dis 2007; 39: 1087
  8. Waseem T, Javaid-ur-Rehman, Sabir NU, Hussain S, Amir E, Arif S. Rare association: Ileocaeco-colic intussusception secondary to mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix in an adult. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 1021-2
  9. Kawamura YJ, Toyama N, Kasamatsu T, Ota M, Konishi F. Intussusception of appendiceal adenoma mimicking invasive carcinoma. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 749
  10. Mathew J, Aldean IM, Ghafar FA, Haboubi NY. Appendicular intussusception into a polyp. Tech Coloproctol 2004; 8: 113-5
  11. Larsen SG, Nilssen A, Helseth A, Bohler P, Giercksky KE. Invagination of the appendix with carcinoid tumour. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 993-7
  12. Butte JM, Torres J, Henriquez IM, Pinedo G. Appendicular mucosal in- tussusception into the cecum secondary to an intramural mucinous cystoadenoma of the appendix. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 510
  13. Takahashi M, Sawada T, Fukuda T, Furugori T, Kuwano H. Complete appendiceal intussusception induced by primary appendiceal adenocarcinoma in tubular adenoma: a case report. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2003; 33: 413-5
  14. Thomas RE, Maude K, Rotimi O. A case of an intussuscepted neuroendocrine carcinoma of the appendix. World J Gastroenterol 200614; 12: 971-3
  15. Goodwin DP. Intussusception due to hamartoma. Br Med J 1967; 4: 681-2
  16. Bailey DJ, Courington KR, Andres JM, Bagwell CE, Hitchcock CL. Cecal polyp and appendiceal intussusception in a child with recurrent abdominal pain: diagnosis by colonoscopy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1987; 6: 818-20
  17. Solomon DJ, Freson M, Pr