Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Short term outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal and complex pelvic organ prolapse: case series

Rektal ve kompleks pelvik organ prolapsuslarında laparoskopik ventral mesh rektopeksinin kısa dönem sonuçları

Pages
91–97
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

WCS significantly improved after LVMR in patients with symptomatic rectocele combined with enterocele or sigmoidocele (p= 0.005), and significant improvement was also observed in patients with symptomaticrectocele combined with gynecologic organ prolapse, preoperative median WCS was 18 and the postoperative value fell to 8 (p= 0.005).Conclusion: LVMR is an effective surgical option for rectal and complex pelvic organ prolapse with short-term follow-up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is a technique gaining more recognition for the management of pelvic floor disorders, such asexternal rectal prolapse (ERP), high grade internal rectal prolapse (IRP) and rectocele.
📊
Key Findings & Data:LVMR also allows correction of coexisted pelvic organ prolapse.This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and functional outcome of LVMR for rectal and complex pelvic organ prolapse.Material and Methods: All patients who underwent LVMR from February 2014 to October 2017 were included into the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:WCS significantly improved after LVMR in patients with symptomatic rectocele combined with enterocele or sigmoidocele (p= 0.005), and significant improvement was also observed in patients with symptomaticrectocele combined with gynecologic organ prolapse, preoperative median WCS was 18 and the postoperative value fell to 8 (p= 0.005).Conclusion: LVMR is an effective surgical option for rectal and complex pelvic organ prolapse with short-term follow-up.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is a technique gaining more recognition for the management of pelvic floor disorders, such asexternal rectal prolapse (ERP), high grade internal rectal prolapse (IRP) and rectocele. LVMR also allows correction of coexisted pelvic organ prolapse.This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and functional outcome of LVMR for rectal and complex pelvic organ prolapse.Material and Methods: All patients who underwent LVMR from February 2014 to October 2017 were included into the study. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and three months postoperatively. Surgical complications and functional results in terms of fecal incontinence (measured with theWexner Incontinence Score= WIS) and constipation (measured with the Wexner Constipation Score= WCS) were analyzed.Results: Thirty (4 males) patients underwent LVMR. Seventeen (56.6%) patients had complex pelvic organ prolapse according to MRI findings. Medianoperative time and postoperative stay were 110 minutes and 4 days, respectively. No mesh-related complication and recurrence were observed. Beforesurgery, 21 (70%) patients had complained about symptoms of obstructed defecation. WCS decreased significantly from median 19 to 6 (p< 0.001). Preoperative median WIS of 9 patients was 14 and went down to 6 postoperatively (p= 0.008). WCS significantly improved after LVMR in patients with symptomatic rectocele combined with enterocele or sigmoidocele (p= 0.005), and significant improvement was also observed in patients with symptomaticrectocele combined with gynecologic organ prolapse, preoperative median WCS was 18 and the postoperative value fell to 8 (p= 0.005).Conclusion: LVMR is an effective surgical option for rectal and complex pelvic organ prolapse with short-term follow-up.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Laparoskopik ventral mesh rektopeksi (LVMR), eksternal rektal prolapsus (ERP), yüksek derece internal rektal prolapsus (İRP) ve rektosel gibi pelvik taban hastalıklarının tedavisinde daha çok kullanılır hale gelmiştir. LVMR ayrıca pelvik organ prolapsuslarının da tedavisine olanak sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada LVMR’nin, rektal ve kompleks pelvik organ prolapsuslarında güvenlik etkinlik ve kısa dönem fonksiyonel sonuçları incelenmiştir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Şubat 2014-Ekim 2017 tarihleri arasında LVMR yapılan tüm hastalar çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Hastalar preoperatif ve post-operatif 3. ayda değerlendirilmişlerdir. Cerrahi komplikasyonlar ve fonksiyonel sonuçlar; fekal inkontinans, Wexner İnkontinans Skoru (WİS) ve konstipasyon, Wexner Konstipasyon Skoru (WKS) ile değerlendirilmiştir.Bulgular: Otuz hastaya (4’ü erkek) LVMR yapılmıştır. On yedi (56,6%) hastada dinamik-Mr defekografi bulgularına göre kompleks pelvik organ prolapsusunun olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ortalama operasyon ve hastanede kalış süreleri 110 dakika ve 4 gündür. Mesh komplikasyonu veya rekürrens izlenmemiştir. Preoperatif 21 (%70) hastada obstrüktif defekasyon yakınmaları olduğu tespit edilmiş olup, WKS’nin median 19’dan post-operatif 3. ayda 6’ya düştüğü görülmüştür (p< 0,001). Preoperatif WİS’in hesaplandığı ve median 14 olduğu 9 hastada postoperatif 3. ayda 6’ya düştüğü saptanmıştır (p= 0,008). Semptomatik rektosel ile birlikte enterosel ve sigmoidoseli olan hastalarda da WKS LVMR sonrası anlamlı dere-cede düzeldiği görülmüş (p= 0,005) ve ayrıca anlamlı düzelme semptomatik rektosel ve beraberinde jinekolojik organ prolapsusu olan hastalarda da izlenmiş; preoperatif median WKS’nin 18’den postoperatif 8’e gerilemiştir (p= 0,005).Sonuç: Serimizdeki hastalarda kısa dönem takiplerde LVMR’nin, etkili bir cerrahi seçenek olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

gülte, F. A. (2022). Short term outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal and complex pelvic organ prolapse: case series. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 91–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/614347

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1500-5
  2. Mercer-Jones MA, D’Hoore A, Dixon AR, Lehur P, Lindsey I, Mellgren A, et al. Consensus on ventral rectopexy: report of a panel of experts. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16: 82-8
  3. Consten EC, van Iersel JJ, Verheijen PM, Broeders IA, Wolthuis AM, D’Hoore A. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: an observational study of 919 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2015; 262: 742-7
  4. Formijne Jonkers HA, Poierrié N, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Consten EC. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and symptomatic rectocele: an analysis of 245 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 695-9
  5. Wong M, Meurette G, Abet E, Podevin J, Lehur PA. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocele. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 1019-23
  6. Gouvas N, Georgiou PA, Agalianos C, Tan E, Tekkis P, Dervenis C, et al. Ventral colporectopexy for overt rectal prolapse and obstructed defaecation syndrome:a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17: O34-O46
  7. Kim M, Meurette G, Ragu R, Lehur PA. Current surgical treatment of obstructed defecation among selected European opinion leaders in pelvic floor surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20: 395-9
  8. D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1919-23
  9. Chandra A, Kumar S, Maurya AP, Gupta V, Gupta V, Rahul. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: A retrospective study evaluating outcomes in North Indian population. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 27; 8: 321-5
  10. Naeem M, Anwer M, Qureshi MS. Short term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Pak J Med Sci 2016; 32: 875-9
  11. Ye GY, Wang Z, Matzel KE, Cui Z. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defecation in patients with overt pelvic structural abnormalities-a Chinese pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32: 1337-40
  12. Wijffels NA, Collinson R, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. What is the natural history of internal rectal prolapse? Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 822-30
  13. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77-97
  14. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of con