Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Relationship between functional constipation and anal-retentive behavior features

Fonksiyonel kabızlık ve tutucu-anal kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki

Pages
165–170
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Here, it was found that anal-retentive behavior features are prominent in functional constipation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Constipation is the most commonly seen defecation problem related to several environmental factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results were compared with healthy individuals.Results: A total of 47 patients with functional constipation were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Here, it was found that anal-retentive behavior features are prominent in functional constipation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Constipation is the most commonly seen defecation problem related to several environmental factors. Defecation is learned in the childhood anal period in which anal characteristic features appear. Problems in the childhood anal period may affect not only characters but also defecation func-tion. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between constipation and anal characteristic features of participants with functional constipation.Material and Methods: Patients with functional constipation were included into the study according to the ROME III criteria. Patients with irritable bowel disease, slow transit constipation, outlet obstruction constipation, malignancy, and psychiatric diseases were excluded from the study. Patients filled out Personality Belief Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Obsessive Belief Questionnaire. The results were compared with healthy individuals.Results: A total of 47 patients with functional constipation were included in the study. Avoidant, obsessive-compulsive, antisocial, narcissistic, and para-noid personality traits were found to be higher in patients with constipation than in the control group. Perfectionism/certainty, importance and control, and hospital anxiety scores were found to be higher in patients with constipation than in the control group.Conclusion: Constipation may be related to several factors, such as socioeconomic environment, emotional stress, age, and diet, among others. Here, it was found that anal-retentive behavior features are prominent in functional constipation. Biofeedback, which can be regarded as psychotherapy of defecation control, can be used for treatment.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Kabızlık çok sık görülen bir defekasyon problemi olup çeşitli çevresel faktörlerle ilişkilidir. Defekasyon, anal dönem kişilik bulgula-rının oluştuğu çocukluk anal dönemde görülür. Çocukluk anal dönemdeki problemler sadece kişilik özelliklerini değil defekasyon fonksiyonlarını da etkileyebilir. Bu çalışmada fonksiyonel kabızlığı olan hastalarda kabızlık ve anal kişilik bozukluğu arasındaki ilişki incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya ROME III kriterlerine göre fonksiyonel kabızlığı olan hastalar dahil edildi. İrritabl bağırsak hastalığı, yavaş geçişli konstipasyonu, çıkış obstrüksiyonu olan, malignitesi olan, psikiyatrik hastalığı olan hastalar çalışma dışı bırakıldı. Hastalar kişilik inanç, hastane anksiyete, depresyon ve obsesif inanç anketi doldurdu. Konstipe hastalar benign anorektal hastalığı olan ve olmayan olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Elde edilen bulgular sağlıklı gönüllülerle karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Fonksiyonel kabızlığı olan 47 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Çekingen, obsesif kompulsif, antisosyal, narsist, paranoid kişilik inançları kabız ve hastalıklı hastalarda kontrol grubuna göre daha fazla bulunmuştur. Mükemmelliyetçilik, önem, kontrol ve hastane anksiyetesi kabız ve hastalıklı grupta kontrol grubuna göre daha fazla bulunmuştur.Sonuç: Kabızlık sosyoekonomik, duygusal stres, yaş ve diyet gibi çeşitli faktörlerden etkilenir. Bu çalışmada fonksiyonel kabızlığı olan hastalarda tutucu anal kişilik özelliklerinin daha belirgin olduğunu bulduk. Biofeedback bir çeşit defekasyon kontrol psikoterapisi olduğundan tedavide kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Taş, H. İ., Cerit, C., çelebi, A., Güler, S. A., utkan, Z., Uçar, E., YILMAZ, T. U. (2022). Relationship between functional constipation and anal-retentive behavior features. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 165–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/614338

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Skandalakis JE, Kingsnorth AN. Large intestine and anorectum. Mec-hanism of defecation. In: Skandalakis JE, Kingsnorth AN (eds). Surgical Anatomy. Paschalidis Medical Publication, 2004: 861-1000
  2. Bharucha AE, Wald A, Enck P, Rao S. Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1510-8. [CrossRef] 3. Akervall S, Nordgren S, Fasth S, Oresland T, Petersson K, Hulten L. The effects of age, gender, and parity on rectoanal functions in adults. Scand J Gastroenterol 1990; 25: 1247-56. [CrossRef] 4. Bozkurt MA, Kocataş A, Sürek A, Kankaya B, Kalaycı MU, Alış H. The im-portance of defecography in the assessment of the etiology of chronic constipation: An analysis of 630 patients. Ulusal Cer Derg 2014; 30: 183-5
  3. Devanarayana NM, Rajindrajith S. Bowel habits and behaviors re-lated to defecation in 10- to 16-year olds: Impact of socioeconomic characteristics and emotional stress. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 52: 569-73
  4. Nehra V, Bruce BK, Rath-Harvey DM, Pemberton JH, Camilleri M. Psychological disorders in patients with evacuation disorders and constipation in a tertiary practice. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1755-8
  5. Masand PS, Keuthen NJ, Gupta S, Virk S, Yu-Siao B, Kaplan D. Prevalen-ce of irritable bowel syndrome in obsessive- compulsive disorder. CNS Spectr 2006; 11: 21-5
  6. Bennett EJ, Piesse C, Palmer K, Badcock CA, Tennant CC, Kellw JE. Func-tional gastrointestinal disorders: psychological, social, and somatic features. Gut 1998; 42: 414-20. [Cr 9. Schmitt BD. Toilet training refusal: avoid the battle and win the war. Contemp Pediatr 1987; 4: 32-50
  7. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1480-91
  8. Taymur İ, Turkçapar MH, Örsel S, Sargın E, Akkoyunlu S. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the personality belief questionnaire-short form (PBQ-STF) in the university students. Klinik Psiyatri 2011; 14: 199-209
  9. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-70. [CrossRef] 13. Aydemir Ö, Güvenir T, Küey L, Kültür S. Hastane anksiyete ve depresyon ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlik güvenilirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1997; 8: 280-7
  10. Obsessive Compulsive Cognition Working Group. Psychometric vali-dation of the obsessive belief questionnaire and interpretation of int-rusions inverntory-Part 2: factor analysis and testing of a brief version. Behav Res Ther