Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of the surgical treatment of the patients operated on by using laparoscopic and classic splenectomy due to benign disorders of the spleen

Dalağın iyi seyirli hastalıkları sebebiyle laparoskopik ve klasik splenektomi kullanılarak opere edilen hastaların cerrahi tedavi analizi

Pages
111–116
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Improvement of the laparoscopic technique of surgical teams and technical improvement of the laparoscopic equipment can lead to even wider applicationof laparoscopic splenectomy as standard operative procedure, and thus to safer and better quality treatment of patients with wider spectrum diseasesof the spleen.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Laparoscopic splenectomy became the standard surgical procedure in the 1990s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The goal of this study was to analyze the outcome of thepatients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy for the benign hematologic diseases of the spleen and compare its results with open splenectomy.Material and Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective cohort study analyzing and comparing the data obtained from 196 patients’ caserecords in the Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, for the benign disorders of the spleen, divided into two groups: patients operatedwith laparoscopic technique and patients in whom classic splenectomy was performed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Improvement of the laparoscopic technique of surgical teams and technical improvement of the laparoscopic equipment can lead to even wider applicationof laparoscopic splenectomy as standard operative procedure, and thus to safer and better quality treatment of patients with wider spectrum diseasesof the spleen.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic splenectomy became the standard surgical procedure in the 1990s. The goal of this study was to analyze the outcome of thepatients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy for the benign hematologic diseases of the spleen and compare its results with open splenectomy.Material and Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective cohort study analyzing and comparing the data obtained from 196 patients’ caserecords in the Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, for the benign disorders of the spleen, divided into two groups: patients operatedwith laparoscopic technique and patients in whom classic splenectomy was performed. The analyzed parameters were divided into three groups aspreoperative, intraoperative and postoperative.Results: In the laparoscopic splenectomy group, less intraoperative blood loss, lower incidental intraoperative complications and a shorter duration ofsurgery were recorded. The incidence of postoperative complications and reoperations was higher in the group of classically operated patients. Postoperative recovery, expressed by the duration of postoperative abdominal drainage, recovery of intestinal peristalsis and length of postoperative hospitalization, was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group.Conclusion: Laparoscopic splenectomy is an effective and safe surgical procedure in the treatment of many benign diseases of the spleen. Improvement of the laparoscopic technique of surgical teams and technical improvement of the laparoscopic equipment can lead to even wider applicationof laparoscopic splenectomy as standard operative procedure, and thus to safer and better quality treatment of patients with wider spectrum diseasesof the spleen.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Laparoskopik splenektomi, 1990’lı yıllarda standart cerrahi ameliyat haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, dalağın iyi huylu hema-tolojik hastalıkları için laparoskopik splenektomi olan hastaların sonuçlarını analiz etmek ve bunları açık splenektomi ile karşılaştırmaktı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma, laparoskopik teknik ile opere edilen hastalar ve klasik splenektomi uygulanan hastalar olarak iki gruba ayrılan dalağın iyi seyirli hastalıkları sebebiyle Sırbistan Klinik Merkezi, Sindirim Cerrahisi Kliniğine başvuran toplam 196 hastanın verilerini analiz eden ve karşılaştıran bir retrospektif kohort çalışma olarak yürütüldü. Analiz edilen parametreler preoperatif, intraoperatif ve postoperatif olarak üç gruba ayrıldı. Bulgular: Laparoskopik splenektomi grubunda daha az intraoperatif kan kaybı, daha düşük intraoperatif insidental komplikasyon ve daha kısa ameliyat süresi not edildi. Klasik splenektomi grubunda postoperatif komplikasyonlar ve re-operasyon insidansı daha yüksek bulundu. Postop-eratif abdominal drenaj süresi, intestinal peristalside iyileşme ve postoperatif hastanede kalış süresi ile ifade edilen postoperatif iyileşme lapa-roskopik grupta anlamlı derecede daha kısaydı. Sonuç: Laparoskopik splenektomi, dalağın birçok iyi seyirli hastalığının tedavisinde efektif ve güvenilir bir cerrahi işlemdir. Cerrahi takımların laparoskopik tekniklerindeki gelişme ve laparoskopik ekipmanlardaki teknik gelişim laparoskopik splenektominin standart cerrahi müdahale olarak daha geniş çapta kullanılmasına ve böylelikle dalağın daha geniş hastalık spektrumlarında hastaların daha kaliteli ve güvenilir tedavilerine sebep olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Grubor, N., Milosavljev, V., Tadic, B., Eric, D., Reljic, M., Matic, S. (2022). Analysis of the surgical treatment of the patients operated on by using laparoscopic and classic splenectomy due to benign disorders of the spleen. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 111–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/614332

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Delaitre B, Maignien B, Icard P. Laparoscopic splenectomy. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 1334
  2. Vecchio R, Marchese S, Intagliata E, Swehli E, Ferla F, Cacciola E. Longterm results after splenectomy in adult idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: comparison between open and laparoscopic procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013; 23: 192-8
  3. Di Sabatino A, Carsetti R, Corazza GR. Post-splenectomy and hyposplenic states. Lancet 2011; 378: 86-97
  4. Davies JM, Lewis MP, Wimperis J, Rafi I, Ladhani S, Bolton-Maggs PH, et al. Review of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infection in patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen: prepared on behalf of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology by a working party of the Haemato-Oncology task force. Br J Haematol 2011; 155: 308-17
  5. Buzele R, Barbier L, Sauvanet A, Fantin B. Medical complications following splenectomy. J Visc Surg 2016; 153: 277-86
  6. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13
  7. Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ. Laparoscopic splenectomy. World J Surg 1999; 23: 384-8
  8. Delaitre B, Pitre J. Laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy: a comparative study. Hepatogastroenterology 1997; 44: 45-9
  9. Nobili C, Romano F, Ciravegna AL, Garancini M, Degrate L, Uggeri F, et al. Consecutive concomitant laparoscopic splenectomy and cholecystectomy: an Italian experience of 30 patients and proposition of a technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011; 21: 313-7
  10. Matharoo GS, Afthinos JN, Gibbs KE. Trends in splenectomy: where does laparoscopy stand? JSLS 2014; 18
  11. Marte G, Scuderi V, Rocca A, Surfaro G, Migliaccio C, Ceriello A. Laparoscopic splenectomy: a single center experience. Unusual cases and expanded inclusion criteria for laparoscopic approach. Updates Surg 2013; 65: 115-9
  12. Vecchio R, Intagliata E, Marchese S, La Corte F, Cacciola RR, Cacciola E. Laparoscopic splenectomy coupled with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2014; 18: 252-7
  13. Corcione F, Pirozzi F, Aragiusto G, Galante F, Sciuto A. Laparoscopic splenectomy: experience of a single center in a series of 300 cases. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2870-6
  14. Winslow ER, Brunt LM. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a meta-analysis with an emphasis on complications. Surgery 2003; 134: 647-53; discussion 54-5
  15. Andrales G, Gadacz T. The Sp