Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

An outcome analysis of videoscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement in infected pancreatic necrosis: a single centre experience

Enfekte pankreatik nekrozda videoskopik yardımlı retroperitoneal debridmanın sonuç analizi: tek merkezli çalışma

Pages
214–222
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It decreases postoperative morbidity and mortality and avoids major laparotomy, and hence, it can be considered in a selected group of patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a dreadful complication of moderately severe and severe acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to present an outcome analysis of VARD in the manage-ment of IPN at our tertiary care centre.Material and Methods: The present retrospective analysis of prospectively entered data included 22 patients diagnosed as ANP with IPN from January 2015 to December 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It decreases postoperative morbidity and mortality and avoids major laparotomy, and hence, it can be considered in a selected group of patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a dreadful complication of moderately severe and severe acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP). Vide-oscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) is a minimally invasive surgical option for predominantly left sided, posterior and laterally located disease in patients not responding to conservative and percutaneous options. This study aimed to present an outcome analysis of VARD in the manage-ment of IPN at our tertiary care centre.Material and Methods: The present retrospective analysis of prospectively entered data included 22 patients diagnosed as ANP with IPN from January 2015 to December 2017. These patients were admitted in the surgical gastroenterology unit of our tertiary care centre. The outcome of these patients managed with VARD was evaluated.Results: The aetiology of ANP was idiopathic, and gallstones were found in 7 patients each and alcohol in 8. Twelve patients were managed with a single VARD procedure; whereas, 10 required a re-debridement due to suboptimal improvement. Eighteen out of 22 patients survived whereas 4 succumbed to major postoperative bleeding/severe sepsis and multiorgan failure (Mortality 18.2%). Hospital stay after the index procedure was between 6 to 11 weeks.Conclusion: VARD is a safe and effective surgical option for the management of IPN that worsens or fails to respond to conservative and percutaneous drainage options after a minimum of 4 weeks of moderately severe and severe ANP. It decreases postoperative morbidity and mortality and avoids major laparotomy, and hence, it can be considered in a selected group of patients.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Enfekte pankreatik nekroz (EPN), orta derecede şiddetli ve şiddetli akut nekrotizan pankreatit (ANP)’in korkutucu komplikasyo-nudur. Videoskopik yardımlı retroperitoneal debridman (VYRD), konservatif ve perkütan seçeneklere yanıt vermeyen hastalarda ağırlıklı olarak sol taraflı, posterior ve lateral yerleşimli hastalık için minimal invaziv bir cerrahi seçenektir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, üçüncü basamak tedavi merkezi-mizde EPN yönetiminde kullanılan VRYD’nin sonuç analizini sunmaktı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Prospektif olarak girilen verilerin retrospektif analizini içeren bu çalışmaya Ocak 2015 ve Aralık 2017 tarihleri arasında EPN’li ANP tanısı alan 22 hasta dahil edildi. Bu hastalar üçüncü basamak tedavi merkezimizin cerrahi gastroenteroloji bölümüne yatırıldı. VYRD ile te-davileri yapılan hastalardan alınan sonuçlar değerlendirmeye tabi tutuldu.Bulgular: ANP etyolojisi yedi hastada idiyopatik olmakla birlikte yedi hastada safra kesesi taşı ve sekiz hastada alkol kaynaklıydı. On iki hasta tek bir VRYD müdahalesi ile tedavi edilirken 10 hastada yetersiz iyileşme sebebiyle ikinci debridmana gerek duyuldu. Yirmi iki hastadan 18’i kurtu-lurken dört hastada majör postoperatif kanama/şiddetli sepsis ve çoklu organ yetmezliği gelişti (mortalite: %18.2). Hastanede yatış süresi 6-10 hafta arasındaydı.Sonuç: Dört hafta süren orta şiddetli veya şiddetli ANP sonrasında konservatif ve perkütan drenaj seçeneklerine yanıt vermeyen veya daha da kötüleşen EPN tedavisinde VRYD güvenilir ve efektif bir cerrahi seçenektir. Postoperatif morbidite ve mortaliteyi azaltıp majör laparotomi ihtima-linin önüne geçtiği için seçilmiş hasta gruplarında göz önünde bulundurulabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

dattara, D., Desai, G., Pande, P., Narkhede, R., Wagle, P., Varty, P. (2022). An outcome analysis of videoscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement in infected pancreatic necrosis: a single centre experience. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 214–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/614331

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Lim E, Sundaraamoorthy RS, Tan D, Teh HS, Tan TJ, Cheng A. Step-up approach and video assisted retroperitoneal debridement in infected necrotizing pancreatitis: A case complicated by retroperitoneal blee- ding and colonic fistula. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2015
  2. [CrossR 2. Ji L, Lv JC, Song ZF, Jiang MT, Li L, Sun B. Risk factors of infected panc-reatic necrosis secondary to severe acute pancreatitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2016
  3. Breasted JH ETESSpC, Illinois: The University Chicago Press, 1930
  4. Spe-cial edition,1984. 4. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) defini-tion and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 2017
  5. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC defini-tions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epi-demiol 1992
  6. Livingston EH, Passaro EP, Jr. Postoperative ileus. Dig Dis Sci 1990
  7. Sharma PK, Madan K, Garg PK. Hemorrhage in acute pancreatitis: should gastrointestinal bleeding be considered an organ failure? Pancreas 2008
  8. Jagielski M, Smoczynski M, Adrych K. Endoscopic treatment of multi-locular walled-off pancreatic necrosis with the multiple transluminal gateway technique. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2017
  9. Sorrentino L, Chiara O, Mutignani M, Sammartano F, Brioschi P, Cim-banassi S. Combined totally mini-invasive approach in necrotizing pancreatitis: a case report and systematic literature review. World J Emerg Surg 2017
  10. Senthil Kumar P, Ravichandran P, Jeswanth S. Case matched com-parison study of the necrosectomy by retroperitoneal approach with transperitoneal approach for necrotizing pancreatitis in patients with CT severity score of 7 and above. Int J Surg 2012
  11. Connor S, Alexakis N, Raraty MG, Ghaneh P, Evans J, Hughes M, et al. Early and late complications after pancreatic necrosectomy. Surgery 2005
  12. Nieuwenhuijs VB, Besselink MG, van Minnen LP, Gooszen HG. Surgical management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a 13-year experience and a systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 2003
  13. Ulagendra Perumal S, Pillai SA, Perumal S, Sathyanesan J, Palaniap-pan R. Outcome of video-assisted translumbar retroperitoneal necro-sectomy and closed l