Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

Minimally invasive liver surgery: the Charité experience

Karaciğerin minimal invaziv cerrahisi: Charité deneyimi

Pages
199–206
Publication Date
2022-11-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We hereby give an overview of the establishing of a minimally invasive liver surgery program at our center.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) was established as last abdominal surgical specialty through the 1990s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With a shift from mainly benign to malignant indications, MILS was shown to be equal to open liver surgery in terms of oncological outcomes, with benefits in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, postoperative complication rates, hospital length of stay and quality of life.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We hereby give an overview of the establishing of a minimally invasive liver surgery program at our center.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) was established as last abdominal surgical specialty through the 1990s. With a shift from mainly benign to malignant indications, MILS was shown to be equal to open liver surgery in terms of oncological outcomes, with benefits in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, postoperative complication rates, hospital length of stay and quality of life. With colorectal liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma as the most common indications, most liver resection can be performed minimally invasive nowadays, including patients with liver cirrhosis. Initially perceived limitations of laparoscopic liver surgery were weakened by gaining experience, technical progress and pioneering of new resection approaches. Lately robotic liver surgery was adopted to the field of MILS to further push the limits. To simplify first resections, technical variations of the minimally invasive approach can be utilized, and difficulty scores help to select resections suitable to the level of experience. We hereby give an overview of the establishing of a minimally invasive liver surgery program at our center.

Özet

Minimal invazif karaciğer cerrahisi (MİKC), 1990’lı yıllarda karın cerrahisi uzmanlığının gelişen en son parçasıdır. Önceleri ağırlıklı olarak benign endikasyonlardan malign endikasyonlara olan değişim ile MİKC’nin, intraoperatif kan kaybı, postoperatif ağrı, postoperatif komplikasyon oranı, hastanede kalış süresi ve hayat kalitesi bakımından sağladığı yararlar ile onkolojik sonuçlar açısından açık karaciğer cerrahisine eşdeğer olduğu gösterilmiştir. Kolorektal karaciğer metastazları ve hepatosellüler karsinom endikasyonlarda başı çekerken, günümüzde karaciğer sirozu olan hastalarda dahi birçok karaciğer rezeksiyonu minimal invazif yöntemlerle yapılmaktadır. Laparoskopik karaciğer cerrahisi ile ilgili erken dönemde düşünülen sınırlılıklar, kazanılan deneyimler, teknik alanda ilerlemeler ve yeni rezeksiyon yaklaşımları sonucunda etkisini kaybetmeye başlamıştır. Son yıllarda, sınırları iyice zorlamak adına robotik karaciğer cerrahisi de MİKC alanına uygulanmıştır. İlk rezeksiyonları basitleştirmek için minimal invazif yaklaşımın teknik varyasyonları kullanılabilmekte ve tecrübe seviyesine uygun rezeksiyonların seçiminde zorluk skorları da yardımcı olmak- tadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, merkezimizde başlattığımız minimal invazif karaciğer cerrahisi programının bir özetini sunmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Nösser, M., Feldbrügge, L., Pratschke, J. (2022). Minimally invasive liver surgery: the Charité experience. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 199–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/614278

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Foures A, Ricordeau P JC. Sur la laparoscopie en pathologie hépatique [Laparoscopy in liver pathology]. Arch Mal Appar Dig Mal Nutr 1951
  2. 40(12): 1342-3. [CrossRef] 2. Kaneko H, Takagi S, Shiba T. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: Technique and results of a clinical series. Surgery 1996
  3. 120(3): 468-75. [CrossRef] 3. Knitter S, Andreou A, Kradolfer D, Beierle AS, Pesthy S, Eichelberg A-C, et al. Minimal-invasive versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver me- tastases: bicentric analysis of postoperative outcomes and long-term survival using propensity score matching analysis. J Clin Med 2020
  4. 9(12): 4027. [CrossRef] 4. Andreou A, Struecker B, Raschzok N, Krenzien F, Haber P, Wabitsch S, et al. Minimal-invasive versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of postoperative outcomes and long-term survivals using propensity score matching analysis. Surg Oncol 2018
  5. 27(4): 751-8. [CrossRef] 5. Fretland A, Vegar Ã, Dagenborg J, Maria G, Bjørnelv W, Kazaryan AM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metasta- ses the OSLO-COMET. Randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2018
  6. 267(2): 199-207. [CrossRef] 6. van Dam RM, van Breukelen GJP, Tanis PJ, Ratti F. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme ( ORANGE II study ). Br J Surg 2017
  7. 104(5): 525-35. [CrossRef] 7. Katkhouda N, Hurwitz M, Gugenheim J, Mavor E, Mason RJ, Waldrep DJ, et al. Laparoscopic management of benign solid and cystic lesions of the liver. Ann Surg 1999
  8. 229(4): 460-6. [CrossRef] 8. Descottes B, Glineur D, Lachachi F, Valleix D, Paineau J, Hamy A, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors: Results of a multi- center European experience. Surg Endosc 2003
  9. 17(1): 23-30. [CrossRef] 9. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 2009
  10. 50(5): 831-41. [CrossRef] 10. Schmelzle M, Wabitsch S, Haber PK, Krenzien F, Kästner A, Biebl M, et al. Laparoscopic liver surgery - a single centre series of 250 consecutive cases. Zentralbl Chir 2019
  11. 144(2): 145-52. [CrossRef] 11. Zhang X, Liu R, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Wang T. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with propensity score-based analysis. Int J Surg 2017
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Xie S, Xiong J, Liu X, Chen H, Iglesia-garcí