Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

Role of intra-abdominal pressure in the outcomes of perforation peritonitis: A prospective observational study

Perforasyon peritonitinin sonuçlarında karın içi basıncın rolü: İleriye dönük bir gözlemsel çalışma

Pages
253–259
Publication Date
2022-11-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No statistically significant correlation of IAP with the occurrence of burst abdomen and duration of hospital stay could be found, which warrants further studies with a larger population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has been investigated for its role in causing morbidity and mortality, with various studies showing different degrees of correlation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: It is a prospective observational study involving 40 patients of perforation peritonitis undergoing exploratory laparotomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No statistically significant correlation of IAP with the occurrence of burst abdomen and duration of hospital stay could be found, which warrants further studies with a larger population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has been investigated for its role in causing morbidity and mortality, with various studies showing different degrees of correlation. There remains paucity of literature on this subject, applied to patients of perforation peritonitis, especially in the Indian subcon- tinent. Material and Methods: It is a prospective observational study involving 40 patients of perforation peritonitis undergoing exploratory laparotomy. IAP was measured as per WSACS (World Society of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome) guidelines. APACHE II (Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evalu- ation- II) and SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) were calculated. Data was collected regarding occurrence of prolonged ileus, burst abdomen, duration of hospital stay, 30 day mortality, and was statistically analyzed to correlate with IAP. Results: At admission, mean IAP was 13.37 mmHg, and the incidence of IAH was 65%. IAH was seen in 17.9% and 7.6% at 24 h and 48 h post-operatively. Incidence of prolonged ileus and burst abdomen were 7.7% and 22.5% respectively. Mortality rate was 17.5%. Mean duration of hospital stay was 13.45 days. Post-operative IAP correlated with mortality (p: 0.014) and post-operative SOFA score (p< 0.05). Statistically significant correlation was also seen with the occurrence of prolonged ileus (p: 0.006). IAP did not significantly correlate with APACHE II score, occurrence of burst abdomen, and duration of hospital stay. Conclusion: Rise in IAP correlates with deterioration of SOFA score, and also with the occurrence of prolonged ileus. IAP is also a predictor of mortality. IAP measured post-operatively (24 and 48 hours) had a better correlation with these outcomes than the value measured at admission. No statistically significant correlation of IAP with the occurrence of burst abdomen and duration of hospital stay could be found, which warrants further studies with a larger population.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Karın içi basıncın (IAP), morbidite ve mortaliteye etkisindeki rolünü araştıran çeşitli çalışmalarda farklı korelasyon dereceleri gös- termiştir. Bu konuda perforasyon peritoniti hastalarında, özellikle Hint yarımadasındaki çalışmalara dayanan literatür eksikliği vardır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu araştırma, laparotomi yapılan perforasyon peritonitli 40 hastayı içeren prospektif bir gözlemsel çalışmadır. IAP, WSACS (World Society of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome) yönergelerine göre ölçülmüştür. Bu itibarla hastalarda APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation- II) ve SOFA skorları (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) hesaplandı. Uzamış ileus, evantrasyon, hastanede kalış süresi, 30 günlük mortalite ile ilgili veriler toplandı ve IAP ile korelasyon gösterecek şekilde istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Başvuru sırasında ortalama IAP 13,37 mmHg ve IAH insidansı %65 idi. Ameliyat sonrası 24. saat ve 48. saatte IAH %17,9 ve %7,6’da gö- rüldü. Uzamış ileus ve evantrasyon insidansı sırasıyla %7,7 ve %22,5 idi. Ölüm oranı %17,5 idi. Ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 13,45 gündü. Ame- liyat sonrası IAP mortalite (p: 0,014) ve ameliyat sonrası SOFA skoru (p< 0,05) ile korele idi. Uzamış ileus oluşumu ile de istatistiksel olarak anlamlı korelasyon görüldü (p: 0,006). IAP, APACHE II skoru, patlama karnının oluşumu ve hastanede kalış süresi ile anlamlı bir korelasyon göstermedi. Sonuç: IAP’deki artış, SOFA skorunun bozulması ve ayrıca uzamış ileus oluşumu ile ilişkilidir. IAP ayrıca mortalitenin bir öngörücüsüdür. Posto- peratif olarak ölçülen IAP (24 ve 48 saat), bu sonuçlarla, başvuru sırasında ölçülen değerden daha iyi bir korelasyona sahipti. IAP’nin evantrasyon oluşumu ve hastanede kalış süresi ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir korelasyonu bulunamamıştır. Bu daha geniş bir popülasyonla yapılacak daha ileri çalışmaları desteklemekted

🔖

Cite This Article

N., P. K., Bains, L., Lal, P., Mishra, A., Beg, M. Y., Maranna, H. (2022). Role of intra-abdominal pressure in the outcomes of perforation peritonitis: A prospective observational study. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 253–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/614253

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kidwai R, Baral RK, Sharma A. Analysis of intra-abdominal pressure in obstructive and perforative lesions of gastro- intestinal tract. J Nep Med Col 2018
  2. 16(2): 31-4. [CrossRef] 2. Sugrue M, Buhkari Y. Intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal com- partment syndrome in acute general surgery. World J Surg 2009
  3. 33(6): 1123-7. [CrossRef] 3. Reintam A, Parm P, Kitus R, Kern H, Starkopf J. Primary and secondary intra-abdominal hypertension – different impact on ICU outcome. Intensive Care Med 2008
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Bains L. Lal P, Mishra A, Gupta A, Gautam KK, Kaur D. Abdoinal com- partment syndrome: a comprehensive pathophysiological review. MAMC J Med Sci 2019
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 1996
  6. 22(7): 707-10. [CrossRef] 6. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II. Critical Care Med 1985
  7. 13(10): 818-9. [CrossRef] 7. Cheatham ML. Abdominal compartment syndrome: Pathophysio- logy and definitions. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Malbrain MLNG, Cheatham ML, Kirkpatrick A, Sugrue M, Parr M, De Waele J et al. Results from the conference of experts on intra-abdo- minal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. Part I: Definitions. Intensive Care Med 2006
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Sharma K, Kumar M, Batra UB. Anesthetic management for patients with perforation peritonitis. J AnaesthesiolClinPharmacol 2013
  10. 29(4): 445-53. [CrossRef] 10. Cheatham ML. Nonoperative management of intraabdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. World J Surg 2009
  11. 1116–22. [CrossRef] 11. Sugrue M, Buist MD, Hourihan F, Deane S, Bauman A, Hillman K. Pros- pective study of intra-abdominal hypertension and renal function after laparotomy. Br J Surg 1995
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Meldrum DR, Moore FA, Moore EE. Prospective characterization and selective management of the abdominal compartment syndrome. Am J Surg 1997
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Daga S, Yerrapragada S, Chowdary AK, Satyanarayana G. Analyzing intra-abdominal pressures and outcomes in patients undergoing la- parotomy. Int Surg J 2017 Jan
  14. 4(1): 111-6. [CrossRef] 14. Blaser R, Regli A, De Keulenaer B, Kimball EJ, Starkopf L, Davis WA et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of intra- abdominal hyper - tension in critically ill patients- a prospective multicen