Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

Functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection in low rectal tumors

Alt rektum kanserlerinin intersfinkterik rezeksiyonunun işlevsel sonuçları

Pages
180–186
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In the treatment of distal rectal cancer, adequate oncological surgery and relatively acceptable functional outcomes can be obtained with intersphincteric resection technique in suitable patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Currently, sphincter-saving procedures are increasingly performed in the treatment of low rectal cancers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We evaluated the electronic data files of 29 patients who had intersphincteric resections at our institute between 2008 and 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In the treatment of distal rectal cancer, adequate oncological surgery and relatively acceptable functional outcomes can be obtained with intersphincteric resection technique in suitable patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Currently, sphincter-saving procedures are increasingly performed in the treatment of low rectal cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent intersphincteric resection. Material and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. We evaluated the electronic data files of 29 patients who had intersphincteric resections at our institute between 2008 and 2018. Bowel function outcomes were assessed prospectively using Wexner incontinence score. Histopathological, surgical and functional outcomes were analyzed. Results: Mean age of nine female and 20 male patients included in the study was 55.8 ± 12.8 (30-76) years. A tumor-free surgical margin was achieved in all patients. Anastomotic leakage was detected in two patients. Mean Wexner incontinence score of 20 patients who still had functional anastomosis was 8.35, whereas 65% of the patients (n= 13) had a good continence status. There was no relationship between the continence status and sex, tumor distance from anal verge, T stage, distal surgical margin, and lymph node involvement. Twenty-one patients underwent primary coloanal anastomosis and eight patients underwent two-stage coloanal anastomosis. Conclusion: In the treatment of distal rectal cancer, adequate oncological surgery and relatively acceptable functional outcomes can be obtained with intersphincteric resection technique in suitable patients.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Günümüzde alt rektum kanserlerinin tedavisinde sfinkter koruyucu işlemler giderek daha fazla uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, intersfinkterik rezeksiyon yapılan hastaların sonuçlarını değerlendirmekti. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma, tek merkezli, retrospektif ve kesitsel bir analizdir. 2008-2018 yılları arasında kliniğimizde intersfinkterik rezeksiyon uygulanan 29 hastanın elektronik veri dosyaları değerlendirildi. Bağırsak fonksiyonları prospektif olarak Wexner inkontinans skoru kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Histopatolojik, cerrahi ve fonksiyonel sonuçlar değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan dokuz kadın, 20 erkek hastanın yaş ortalaması 55,8 ± 12,8 (30-76) yıl idi. Tüm hastalarda tümörsüz cerrahi sınır elde edilmişti. İki hastada anastomoz kaçağı saptandı. Halen fonksiyonel bir anastomozu olan 20 hastanın ortalama Wexner inkontinans skoru 8,35 idi. Hastaların 13’ünde (%65) iyi bir kontinans durumu mevcuttu. Kontinans durumu ile cinsiyet, tümörün anal verge uzaklığı, T evresi, distal cerrahi sınır ve lenf nodu tutulumu arasında ilişki saptanmadı. Yirmi bir hastaya primer koloanal anastomoz, sekiz hastaya iki aşamalı koloanal anastomoz uygulandı. Sonuç: Distal rektum kanseri tedavisinde uygun hastalarda intersfinkterik rezeksiyon tekniği ile yeterli onkolojik cerrahi ve nispeten kabul edilebilir fonksiyonel sonuçlar elde edilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZBIYIK, O., ÇALIŞKAN, C., KÖSE, Ö., GÖKTEPE, B., YOLDAŞ, T., AKGÜN, E., KORKUT, M. A. (2022). Functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection in low rectal tumors. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 180–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/614244

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Garcia-Henriquez N, Galante DJ, Monson JRT. Selection and outcomes in abdominoperineal resection. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 1339.
  2. Bahayi K, Attaallah W, Yardımcı S, Bulut H, Özten E. Depression, anxiety, sexual dysfunction and quality of life in patients with ileostomy or colostomy. Turkish J Color Dis 2018; 14; 28(2): 69-75. https://doi. org/10.4274/tjcd.87369 3. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 1994; 81(9): 1376- 8.
  3. Çalişkan C, Korkut M. Intersphincteric rectum resection for low rectal tumors: Report of five cases. Turkish J Surg 2010; 26(3): 161-4. https:// doi.org/10.5097/1300-0705.UCD.147-10.03 5. Piozzi GN, Park H, Choi TS, Kim SH. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: A review of anatomy and surgical techniques, oncologic and functional outcomes and the role of robotics. Turkish J Color Dis 2020; 30(2): 76-85. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjcd.galenos. 2020.2020-3-4 6. Cipe G, Muslumanoglu M, Yardimci E, Memmi N, Aysan E. Intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis in treatment of distal rectal cancer. Int J Surg Oncol 2012; 2012: 581258.
  4. Shirouzu K, Murakami N, Akagi Y. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: A review of the updated literature. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2017; 1(1): 24-32.
  5. Sun G, Lou Z, Zhang H, Yu GY, Zheng K, Gao XH, et al. Retrospective study of the functional and oncological outcomes of conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of very low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24(10): 1025-34. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10151-020-02229-2 9. Toiyama Y, Kusunoki M. Changes in surgical therapies for rectal cancer over the past 100 years: A review. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020; 4(4): 331-42.
  6. Gezen C, Altuntas YE, Kement M, Okkabaz N, Bilici A, Vural S, et al. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections for mid or low rectal adenocarcinomas: A retrospective, comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 2011; 21(6): 396-402. https://doi. org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31823a99d0 11. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Ishikawa K, Fujimoto H, Shinto E, et al. Preoperative parameters expanding the indication of sphincter preserving surgery in patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2004; 239(1):