Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

Microperforation after colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection, air in 5 separate locations

Kolonik endoskopik submukozal diseksiyon sonrası mikroperforasyon, 5 ayrı lokalizasyonda hava

Pages
298–301
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, we would like to highlight the potential for complications after ESD, even for the rare and unexpected ones, to contribute to their recognition and treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal dissection (EMD) are recognized treatment procedures for mucosal lesions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed to present a 58-year-old male patient in whom lesion was detected in the proximal part of the descending colon during a colonoscopy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, we would like to highlight the potential for complications after ESD, even for the rare and unexpected ones, to contribute to their recognition and treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal dissection (EMD) are recognized treatment procedures for mucosal lesions. There will always be a risk for complications even if they are performed by experienced specialists. In this study, we aimed to present a 58-year-old male patient in whom lesion was detected in the proximal part of the descending colon during a colonoscopy. Histopathological examination of the lesion revealed intramucosal carcinoma. The lesion was removed by ESD but after the intervention, bilateral pneumothoraxes, pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum and pneumoderma complications observed. It is quite unlikely to encounter all of these complications together in one patient. In this paper, we would like to highlight the potential for complications after ESD, even for the rare and unexpected ones, to contribute to their recognition and treatment.

Özet

Mukozal lezyonlar için endoskopik submukozal diseksiyon (ESD) ve endoskopik mukozal diseksiyon (EMD) kabul görmüş bir tedavi prosedürüdür. Deneyimli uzmanlar tarafından gerçekleştirilse bile, her zaman komplikasyon riski vardır. Yazımızda kolonoskopi sırasında inen kolonun proksimalinde lezyon saptanan, 58 yaşında bir erkek hastayı sunduk. Lezyonun histopatolojik incelemesinde intramukozal karsinom saptandı. Lezyon ESD ile çıkarıldı ancak girişim sonrası bilateral pnömotoraks, pnömoperiton, pnömoretroperiton, pnömomediastinum ve pnömoderma komplikasyonları izlendi. Bu komplikasyonların hepsine bir hastada karşılaşılması pek olası değildir. Bu yazımızda ESD sonrası nadir ve beklenmedik komplikasyonların olasılığını vurgulamak, bu komplikasyonların tespit ve tedavisine katkıda bulunmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGİZ, F., ÇAKIR, V., KAMER, K. E., COŞKUN, H. T., HACIYANLI, M. (2022). Microperforation after colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection, air in 5 separate locations. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 298–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/614227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Białek A, Wiechowska-Kozłowska A, Pertkiewicz J, Karpińska K, Marlicz W, Milkiewicz P, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of neoplastic lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 1953-61. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19. i12.1953 2. Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim SJ, Kim MJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, et al. Clinical significance of intraperitoneal air on computed tomography scan after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric neoplasms. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 307-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013- 3188-9 3. Jang CS, Park DK, Kwon KA, Yu SK, Kim YK. Pneumothorax as a complication of ESD. Endoscopy 2007; 39: E59 https://doi. org/10.1055/s-2006-945065 4. Białek A, Pertkiewicz J, Karpińska K, Marlicz W, Bielicki D, Starzyńska T. Treatment of large colorectal neoplasms by endoscopic submucosal dissection: A Europeansingle-center study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26: 607-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ MEG.0000000000000079 5. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-7. https://doi. org/10.1055/s-0043-102569 6. Hong MJ, Kim JH, Lee SY, Sung IK, Park HS, Shim CS. Prevalence and clinical features of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 211-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3484-9 7. Hekimoğlu E, Turna A, Kara V, Demirkaya A, Kaynak K. Rectosigmoidoscopy complicated by bilateral pneumothoraces, pneumomediastinum, pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, and pneumoderma. Ulusal Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2017; 23: 269-71.