Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Laparoscopic liver right posterior sectionectomies; surgical technique and clinical results of a single surgeon experience

Laparoskopik karaciğer sağ arka kesitektomiler; tek cerrah deneyiminin cerrahi tekniği ve klinik sonuçları

Pages
18–24
Publication Date
2022-11-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In our article, we stated the tips and tricks that make it easy to perform laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomies, which have been thought to be difficult until recently and these difficulties have been clearly stated in many articles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Laparoscopic liver resections have been performed with increasing frequency in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Evaluation was made of the laparoscopic major liver resections performed consecutively between 2015-2020 in our center.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In our article, we stated the tips and tricks that make it easy to perform laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomies, which have been thought to be difficult until recently and these difficulties have been clearly stated in many articles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic liver resections have been performed with increasing frequency in recent years. With increasing surgical experience and technological developments, more complex laparoscopic liver resections can now be applied. Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LSPS) requires a sophisticated and highly challenging surgical technique due to the length of the parenchyma transection line and the camera out of view in laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to share tips and tricks about resection which will contribute to the operation time and technique. Material and Methods: Evaluation was made of the laparoscopic major liver resections performed consecutively between 2015-2020 in our center. During the resections, three different inflow control techniques were used; hilar, glassonian and intraparenchymal approach. Results: A total of 14 LSPS surgeries were performed. Mean age of the patients was 51.6 ± 10.2 years (34-68), and mean operation time was 300 ± 58 (200-440) minutes. The Pringle maneuver was applied to all patients, with a mean time of 58.4 ± 14.4 (30-75) minutes. Mean perioperative bleeding was measured as 290 ± 105 (140-550) mL. Additional surgery was performed on six patients in the same session. Complications occurred in three patients. No perioperative mortality was observed. Conclusion: LSPS is a technically difficult process, which requires advanced skills in both liver surgery and laparoscopic surgery. Surgeons should consider applying this method, which offers different advantages depending on the location and nature of the lesion, after completing the learning curve by performing laparoscopic liver surgery of the correct number and type. In our article, we stated the tips and tricks that make it easy to perform laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomies, which have been thought to be difficult until recently and these difficulties have been clearly stated in many articles.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Laparoskopik karaciğer rezeksiyonları, son yıllarda artan sıklıkla uygulanan ameliyatlardandır. Artan cerrahi deneyim ve teknolojik gelişmelerle birlikte giderek daha kompleks laparoskopik karaciğer rezeksiyonları uygulama alanı bulabilmektedir. Laparoskopik sağ posterior sektörektomi (LSPS), parankim transeksiyon hattının uzunluğu ve laparoskopik cerrahide kamera açısı dışında kalması nedeniyle sofistike ve yüksek zorluk derecesine sahip bir cerrahi teknik gerektirmektedir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2015-2019 yılları arasında ardışık olarak yapılan laparoskopik majör karaciğer rezeksiyonlarımızı değerlendirdik. Rezeksiyonlar esnasında üç farklı inflow kontrol tekniği kullandık; intraparankimal, hiler ve glassonian yaklaşım. Bulgular: Dört yılda 12 adet LSPS ameliyatı gerçekleştirildi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 51’di, ortalama ameliyat süresi 290 (140-380) dakikaydı. Tüm hastalara pringle manevrası uygulandı, ortalama pringle süresi 55 (30-75) dakika olarak belirlendi. Ortalama perioperatif kanama 297 (140-550) ml ölçüldü. Hastaların yarısına (6 hasta) aynı seansta ek cerrahi işlem uygulandı. Ameliyatların tamamı laparoskopik olarak tamamlandı ve hastalarda perioperatif mortalite gözlenmedi. Sonuç: LSPS uygulanabilir, verimli ve güvenlidir. Bununla birlikte, teknik olarak zor bir işlemdir ve hem karaciğer cerrahisi hem de laparoskopik cerrahide ileri beceriler gerektirir. Cerrahlar, öğrenim eğrisini doğru sayı ve türde laparoskopik karaciğer cerrahisi yaparak tamamlamalı ve lezyonun yeri ve doğasına bağlı olarak farklı avantajlar sunan bu yöntemi uygulamayı düşünmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTAŞ, M., LAPSEKİLİ, E., CAN, M. F. (2022). Laparoscopic liver right posterior sectionectomies; surgical technique and clinical results of a single surgeon experience. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 18–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/614222

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Seehofer D, Sucher R, Schmelzle M, Öllinger R, Lederer A, Denecke T, et al. Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery as standard procedure for HCC in cirrhosis? Z Gastroenterol 2017
  2. 55(5): 453-60. https://doi. org/10.1055/s-0043-100021 2. Cipriani F, Rawashdeh M, Ahmed M, Armstrong T, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery of liver metastases: a single-centre experience. Updates Surg 2015
  3. 67(2): 185-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0308-1 3. Di Fabio F, Barkhatov L, Bonadio I, Dimovska E, Fretland ÅA, Pearce NW, et al. The impact of laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery on subsequent laparoscopic resection of liver metastases: A multicenter study. Surgery 2015
  4. 157(6): 1046-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.007 4. Martínez Cecilia D, Cipriani F, Vishal S, Ratti F, Tranchart H, Barkhatov L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases in elderly and octogenarian patients: a multicenter propensity score based analysis of short- and long-term outcomes. Ann Surg 2017
  5. 265(6): 1192-200. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002147 5. Van der Heijde N, Ratti F, Aldrighetti L, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Can MF, D’Hondt M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open right posterior sectionectomy: an international, multicenter, propensity score-matched evaluation. Surg Endosc 2021
  6. 35(11): 6139-49 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08109-y 6. Teo JY, Kam JH, Chan CY, Goh BKP, Wong JS, Lee VTW. Laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and ante- rolateral lesions-a comparison experience in an Asian centre. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2015
  7. Di Fabio F, Samim M, Di Gioia P, Godeseth R, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M. Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: clinical out- comes and classification. World J Surg 2014
  8. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00268-014-2724-7 8. Kaneko H, Takagi S, Shiba T. Laparoscopic partial hepa- tectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: technique and results of a clinical series. Surgery 1996
  9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039- 6060(96)80065-1 9. Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014
  10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.166 10. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, et al. Recommen- dations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.