Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

Shabir’s “SMART-LAB” score for predicting complicated appendicitis-a prospective study

Komplike apandisiti öngörmede Shabir’in “SMART-LAB” skoru: Prospektif bir çalışma

Pages
140–148
Publication Date
2022-11-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

SMART-LAB score of >9 was present in significantly higher number of patients in complicated (perforated and gangrenous) appendicitis than uncomplicated appendicitis (p value 9 (with a sensitivity= 80.7%, specificity= 92.9%, PPV= 85.7%, NPV= 90.1%, and accuracy= 88.7%), while a score 7-9 needs further confirmation to reach a conclusion, and for a score of

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Complicated appendicitis needs an aggressive and urgent management, hence there is need of an efficient scoring system for predicting complicated appendicitis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Of a total of 150 patients included in this study, 52 cases turned out to be perforated and/or gangrenous appendicitis on intraoperative/histopathologic examination.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:SMART-LAB score of >9 was present in significantly higher number of patients in complicated (perforated and gangrenous) appendicitis than uncomplicated appendicitis (p value 9 (with a sensitivity= 80.7%, specificity= 92.9%, PPV= 85.7%, NPV= 90.1%, and accuracy= 88.7%), while a score 7-9 needs further confirmation to reach a conclusion, and for a score of
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Complicated appendicitis needs an aggressive and urgent management, hence there is need of an efficient scoring system for predicting complicated appendicitis. With this in mind, the author developed the present scoring system for predicting complicated acute appendicitis. The study aimed to assess the suitability of this novel (Shabir’s SMART-LAB) score for predicting diagnosis of complicated appendicitis. Material and Methods: In this prospective study, a novel score designated as “SMART-LAB” SCORE, proposed by the author (Shabir) based on his previous observations was calculated in all patients. This score includes sonography (S), migratory right iliac fossa pain (M), anorexia (A), rebound tenderness (R), tenderness (T), leukocytosis (L), Acute phase protein-CRP (A), and serum bilirubin (B). Results: Of a total of 150 patients included in this study, 52 cases turned out to be perforated and/or gangrenous appendicitis on intraoperative/histopathologic examination. The most commonly affected age group was 10-19 years. SMART-LAB score of >9 was present in significantly higher number of patients in complicated (perforated and gangrenous) appendicitis than uncomplicated appendicitis (p value 9 (with a sensitivity= 80.7%, specificity= 92.9%, PPV= 85.7%, NPV= 90.1%, and accuracy= 88.7%), while a score 7-9 needs further confirmation to reach a conclusion, and for a score of

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Komplike apandisitte agresif ve acil müdahale gerekir, bu sebeple komplike apandisiti öngörmek adına etkili bir skorlama sistemine ihtiyaç vardır. Bu amaçla, yazar tarafından komplike akut apandisiti öngören bir skorlama sistemi geliştirildi. Bu çalışmanın amacı, komplike apandisit tanısının öngörülmesinde bu yeni skorlama sisteminin (Shabir’in SMART-LAB skoru) uygunluğunu değerlendirmekti. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu prospektif çalışmada, kendi gözlemleri doğrultusunda yazar (Shabir) tarafından geliştirilen “SMART-LAB SCORE” adındaki bu yeni skor tüm hastalarda hesaplandı. Bu skorlama sistemine sonografi (S), migratör sağ iliyak fosa ağrısı (M), anoreksiya (A), tepkisel duyarlılık (R), duyarlılık (T), Lökositoz (L), akut faz protein-CRP (A) ve serum bilirubin (B) dahildir. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 150 hastanın 52’sinde perfore/gangrenöz apandisit olduğuna intraoperatif/histopatolojik inceleme sonucunda ulaşıldı. En yaygın olarak etkilenen yaş grubu 10-19 yıl idi. SMART-LAB >9 skoru, komplike (perfore veya gangrenöz) apandisit hastalarında komplike olmayan apandisit hastalarına göre daha fazla bulundu (P değeri 9 skorda komplike apandisit yüksek olasılıkta (sensitive= %80,7, spesifite= %92,9, PPV= %85,7, NPV= %90,1, ve doğruluk= %88,7), 7-9 arası skorda sonuca ulaşmak için daha detaylı incelemeler gerektiği ve

🔖

Cite This Article

MIR, S. A., WANI, M. D. (2022). Shabir’s “SMART-LAB” score for predicting complicated appendicitis-a prospective study. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 140–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/614101

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Konan A, Hayran M, Kılıç YA, Karakoç D, Kaynaroğlu V. Scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011; 17: 396-400. https://doi.org/10.5505/ tjtes.2011.03780 2. Escribá A, Gamell AM, Fernánproperatdez Y, Quintillá JM, Cubells CL. Prospective validation of two systems of classification for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27: 165-9. https:// doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e31820d6460 3. Sand M, Bechara FG, Holland-Letz T, Sand D, Mehnert G, Mann B. Diagnostic value of hyperbilirubinemia as a predictivefactor for appendiceal perforation in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 2009; 198: 193-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.026 4. Jo YH, Kim K, Rhee JE, Kim TY, Lee JH, Kang SB, et al. The accuracy of emergency medicine and surgical residents in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28(7): 766-70. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.03.017 5. Doria AS. Optimizing the role of imaging in appendicitis. Pedi¬atr Radiol 2009; 39 (Suppl 2): S144-S148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247- 008-1105-5 6. Rybkin AV, Thoeni RF. Current concepts in imaging of appen¬dicitis. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45: 411-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rcl.2007.04.003 7. Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, Theysohn JM, Ozonoff A, Varghese JC. Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: Accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology 2006; 241(3): 780-6. https://doi. org/10.1148/radiol.2413051896 8. McGowan DR, Sims HM, Shaikh I, Uheba M. The value of hyperbilirubinaemia in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93(6): 498. https://doi.org/10.1308/147870811X591981 9. Emmanuel A, Murchan P, Wilson I, Balfe P. The value of hyperbilirubinaemia in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93(3): 213-7. https://doi.org/10.1308/147870811X566402 10. Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76: 418-9. 11. Andersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: A tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg 2008; 32: 1843-9. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y 12. Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis-a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 2014; 14: 114. https