Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2012 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3

Admixture of higher multi-$hslash omega$ configurations in the calculation of electron scattering form factors of some 1p-shell nuclei

Pages
352–360
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is found that a slight contribution of the higher multi-p-shells with the 1p-shell in the modified initial and/or final states wave functions is sufficient for giving the best description to the form factors data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A semi-microscopic approach that modifies the 1p-shell model wave functions through the admixture of higher p-shells configurations from multi-$hslash omega$ model space is submitted in this work.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The longitudinal form factors of C2 transitions in $^7Li$ and $^{15}N$, and the transverse form factors of M1 transition in $^{12}C$ are calculated in the framework of this approach with the emphasis on the reproduction of the second lobe data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is found that a slight contribution of the higher multi-p-shells with the 1p-shell in the modified initial and/or final states wave functions is sufficient for giving the best description to the form factors data.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A semi-microscopic approach that modifies the 1p-shell model wave functions through the admixture of higher p-shells configurations from multi-$hslash omega$ model space is submitted in this work. The longitudinal form factors of C2 transitions in $^7Li$ and $^{15}N$, and the transverse form factors of M1 transition in $^{12}C$ are calculated in the framework of this approach with the emphasis on the reproduction of the second lobe data. It is found that a slight contribution of the higher multi-p-shells with the 1p-shell in the modified initial and/or final states wave functions is sufficient for giving the best description to the form factors data.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAAD, A. A. A. (2022). Admixture of higher multi-$hslash omega$ configurations in the calculation of electron scattering form factors of some 1p-shell nuclei. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3, 352–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/614043

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. S. Cohen and D. Kurath, Nucl. Phys., 73, (1965), 1
  2. A. A. Wolters, A. G. M. van Hees and P. W. M. Glaudemans, Phys. Rev., C42, (1990), 2053
  3. A. A. Wolters, A. G. M. van Hees and P. W. M. Glaudemans, Phys. Rev., C42, (1990), 2062
  4. J. G. L. Booten and A. G. M. van Hees, Nucl. Phys., A569, (1994), 510
  5. R. A. Radhi, A. A. Abdullah, Z. A. Dakhil and N. M. Adeeb, Nucl. Phys., A696, (2001), 442
  6. I. Talmi, Phys. Rev., C39, (1989), 284
  7. R. L. Huffman, J. Dubach, R. S. Hicks and M. A. Plum, Phys. Rev., C35, (1987), 1
  8. R. A. Radhi, M. A. Elawi and Z. A. Dakhil, Indian J. Theo. Phys., 48, (2000), 13
  9. T. W. Donnelly and I. Sick, Rev. Mod. Phys., 56, (1984), 461
  10. L. J. Tassie and F. C. Barker, Phys. Rev., 111, (1958), 940
  11. B. A. Brown, B. H. Wildenthal, C. F. Williamson, F. N. Rad, S. Kowalski, H. Crannell and J. T. O’Brien, Phys. Rev., C32, (1985), 1127
  12. T. S. H. Lee and D. Kurath, Phys. Rev., C21, (1980), 293
  13. E. deVries et al., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 36, (1987), 500
  14. J. B. Flanz, R. S. Hicks, R. A. Lindgren, G. A. Peterson, A. Hotta, B. Parker and R. S. York, Phys. Rev. Lett., 41, (1978), 1642
  15. C. W. de Jager, H. de Vries and C. de Vries, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 14, (1974), 179
  16. J. G. L. Booten, A. G. M. van Hees, P.W. M. Glaudemans and P. J. Brussaard, Nucl. Phys., A549, (1992), 197
  17. S. Karataglidis, B. A. Brown, K. Amos and P. J. Dortmans, Phys. Rev., C55, (1997), 2826
  18. J. Lichtenstadt, J. Alster, M. A. Moinester, J. Dubach, R. S. Hicks, G. A. Peterson and S. Kowalski, Phys. Lett., B219, (1989), 394
  19. J. Lichtenstadt, J. Alster, M. A. Moinester, J. Dubach, R. S. Hicks, G. A. Peterson and S. Kowalski, Phys. Lett., B244, (1990), 173
  20. R. Yen, L. S. Cardman, D. Kalinsky, J. R. Legg and C. K. Bockelman, Nucl. Phys., A235, (1974), 135
  21. B. T. Chertok, C. Sheffield, J. W. Lightbody, S. Penner and D. Blum, Phys. Rev., C8, (1973), 23
  22. G. A. Beer, D. Brix, H. G. Clerc and B. Laube, Phys. Lett., B26, (1986), 506
  23. U. Deutschmann, G.Lahm, R. Neuhausen and J. C. Bergstrom, Nucl. Phys., A411, (1983), 337
  24. H. Sagawa, T. Suzuki, H. Hyuga and A. Arima, Nucl. Phys., A322, (1979), 361
  25. T. Suzuki, H. Hyuga and A. Arima and K. Yazaki, Nucl. Phys., A358,(1981), 421c
  26. S. Karataglidis, P. J. Dortmans, K. Amos and R. de Swiniarski, Phys. Rev., C52, (1995), 861
  27. R. A. Radhi, Eur. Phys. J., A16, (2003), 387
  28. J. Millener, extracted from ref. [27]
  29. R. A.