SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2012 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3

Admixture of higher multi-\hbarw configurations in the calculation of electron scattering form factors of some 1p-shell nuclei

Ammar A. AL-SAAD
Pages
352–360
Publication Date
2012-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is found that a slight contribution of the higher multi-p-shells with the 1p-shell in the modified initial and/or final states wave functions is sufficient for giving the best description to the form factors data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A semi-microscopic approach that modifies the 1p-shell model wave functions through the admixture of higher p-shells configurations from multi-\hbarw model space is submitted in this work.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The longitudinal form factors of C2 transitions in 7Li and 15N, and the transverse form factors of M1 transition in 12C are calculated in the framework of this approach with the emphasis on the reproduction of the second lobe data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is found that a slight contribution of the higher multi-p-shells with the 1p-shell in the modified initial and/or final states wave functions is sufficient for giving the best description to the form factors data.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:C2 and M1 form factors · incomplete multi-\hbarw model space · C2 and M1 form factors

Abstract

A semi-microscopic approach that modifies the 1p-shell model wave functions through the admixture of higher p-shells configurations from multi-\hbarw model space is submitted in this work. The longitudinal form factors of C2 transitions in 7Li and 15N, and the transverse form factors of M1 transition in 12C are calculated in the framework of this approach with the emphasis on the reproduction of the second lobe data. It is found that a slight contribution of the higher multi-p-shells with the 1p-shell in the modified initial and/or final states wave functions is sufficient for giving the best description to the form factors data.

Özet

A semi-microscopic approach that modifies the 1p-shell model wave functions through the admixture of higher p-shells configurations from multi-\hbarw model space is submitted in this work. The longitudinal form factors of C2 transitions in 7Li and 15N, and the transverse form factors of M1 transition in 12C are calculated in the framework of this approach with the emphasis on the reproduction of the second lobe data. It is found that a slight contribution of the higher multi-p-shells with the 1p-shell in the modified initial and/or final states wave functions is sufficient for giving the best description to the form factors data.

🔖

Cite This Article

AL-SAAD, A. A. (2012). Admixture of higher multi-\hbarw configurations in the calculation of electron scattering form factors of some 1p-shell nuclei. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3, 352–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/724016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. S. Cohen and D. Kurath, Nucl. Phys., 73, (1965), 1. A. A. Wolters, A. G. M. van Hees and P. W. M. Glaudemans, Phys. Rev., C42, (1990), 2053.
  2. A. A. Wolters, A. G. M. van Hees and P. W. M. Glaudemans, Phys. Rev., C42, (1990), 2062. J. G. L. Booten and A. G. M. van Hees, Nucl. Phys., A569, (1994), 510. R. A. Radhi, A. A. Abdullah, Z. A. Dakhil and N. M. Adeeb, Nucl. Phys., A696, (2001), 442. I. Talmi, Phys. Rev., C39, (1989), 284. R. L. Huffman, J. Dubach, R. S. Hicks and M. A. Plum, Phys. Rev., C35, (1987), 1. R. A. Radhi, M. A. Elawi and Z. A. Dakhil, Indian J. Theo. Phys., 48, (2000), 13. T. W. Donnelly and I. Sick, Rev. Mod. Phys., 56, (1984), 461. L. J. Tassie and F. C. Barker, Phys. Rev., 111, (1958), 940. B. A. Brown, B. H. Wildenthal, C. F. Williamson, F. N. Rad, S. Kowalski, H. Crannell and J. T. O’Brien, Phys. Rev., C32, (1985), 1127. T. S. H. Lee and D. Kurath, Phys. Rev., C21, (1980), 293. E. deVries et al., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 36, (1987), 500. J. B. Flanz, R. S. Hicks, R. A. Lindgren, G. A. Peterson, A. Hotta, B. Parker and R. S. York, Phys. Rev. Lett., 41, (1978), 1642. C. W. de Jager, H. de Vries and C. de Vries, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 14, (1974), 179. J. G. L. Booten, A. G. M. van Hees, P. W. M. Glaudemans and P. J. Brussaard, Nucl. Phys., A549, (1992), 197. S. Karataglidis, B. A. Brown, K. Amos and P. J. Dortmans, Phys. Rev., C55, (1997), 2826. J. Lichtenstadt, J. Alster, M. A. Moinester, J. Dubach, R. S. Hicks, G. A. Peterson and S. Kowalski, Phys. Lett., B219, (1989), 394. J. Lichtenstadt, J. Alster, M. A. Moinester, J. Dubach, R. S. Hicks, G. A. Peterson and S. Kowalski, Phys. Lett., B244, (1990), 173. R. Yen, L. S. Cardman, D. Kalinsky, J. R. Legg and C. K. Bockelman, Nucl. Phys., A235, (1974), 135. B. T. Chertok, C. Sheffield, J. W. Lightbody, S. Penner and D. Blum, Phys. Rev., C8, (1973), 23. G. A. Beer, D. Brix, H. G. Clerc and B. Laube, Phys. Lett., B26, (1986), 506. U. Deutschmann, G.Lahm, R. Neuhausen and J. C. Bergstrom, Nucl. Phys., A411, (1983), 337. H. Sagawa, T. Suzuki, H. Hyuga and A. Arima, Nucl. Phys., A322, (1979), 361. T. Suzuki, H. Hyuga and A. Arima and K. Yazaki, Nucl. Phys., A358,(1981), 421c. S. Karataglidis, P. J. Dortmans, K. Amos and R. de Swiniarski, Phys. Rev., C52, (1995), 861. R. A. Radhi, Eur. Phys. J., A16, (2003), 387. J. Millener, extracted from ref. [27]. R. A. Radhi, A. K. Hamoudi and K. S.Jassim, Indian J. Phys., 81, (2007), 683.