Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6

Effect of Al and Ga codoping on the morphological, electronic, and optical properties of ZnO transparent conductive thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis technique

Pages
688–698
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thesheet resistances and electrical resistivity of the AGZO films are significantly lower than those of the 5 at.% Al-dopedZnO films.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Codoping a semiconductor thin film with two or more dopants is a feasible technique to improve the electricalproperties of the thin film.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this work, we studied the codoping of Al and Ga n-type impurities in a ZnO film (AGZO)deposited on a glass substrate by the spray pyrolysis method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thesheet resistances and electrical resistivity of the AGZO films are significantly lower than those of the 5 at.% Al-dopedZnO films.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Codoping a semiconductor thin film with two or more dopants is a feasible technique to improve the electricalproperties of the thin film. In this work, we studied the codoping of Al and Ga n-type impurities in a ZnO film (AGZO)deposited on a glass substrate by the spray pyrolysis method. The total doping concentration, [Al + Ga]/[Al + Ga +Zn], was 5 at.% with varying Al:Ga codoping proportions of 0:5, 1.25:3.75, 2.5:2.5, 3.75:1.25, and 5:0 at.%. The effectof Al/Ga codoping on the structural, texture, morphological, optical, and electrical properties of the AGZO films wereinvestigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscope (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), UVvisible spectroscopy, and four-point probe technique, respectively. Varying Al:Ga codoping proportions significantly alterthe textures and morphologies of the AGZO thin films. Thin films with higher Al doping content exhibit amorphouslike structures due to fine nano grains with high concentrations of disordered grain boundary regions. The opticaltransmittance spectrums show transmittance higher than 80% in the visible light region for all the codoped films. Thesheet resistances and electrical resistivity of the AGZO films are significantly lower than those of the 5 at.% Al-dopedZnO films.

🔖

Cite This Article

SRIPIANEM, W., TECHAPIESANCHAROENKIJ, R. (2022). Effect of Al and Ga codoping on the morphological, electronic, and optical properties of ZnO transparent conductive thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis technique. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6, 688–698. https://ajindex.com/articles/614007

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Tripathy, N.; Ahmad, R.; Song, J. E.; Ko, H. A.; Hahn, Y. B.; Khang, G. Mater. Lett. 2014, 136, 171-174
  2. Kumar, B.; Kim, S. W. Nano Energy 2012, 1, 342-355
  3. Wei, S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, M. Sensor Actuat. B-Chem. 2014, 192, 480-487
  4. Chang, S. P.; Chang, S. J.; Lu, C. Y.; Li, M. J.; Hsu, C. L.; Chiou, Y. Z.; Hsueh, T. J.; Chen, I. C. Superlattice Microst. 2010, 47, 772-778
  5. Al-Kahlout, A. Thin Solid Films 2012, 520, 1814-1820
  6. Al-Kahlout, A. M.; El-Ghamri, H. S.; Al Dahoudi, N.; El-Agez, T. M.; Taya, S. A., Abdel-Latif, M. S. Turk. J. Phys. 2015, 39, 272-279 [7] Bu, Y.; Ao, J. P. Green Energy Environ 2017, 2, 331-362
  7. Techapiesancharoenkij, R.; Sripianem, W.; Tongpul, K.; Peamjharean, C.; Na Wichean, T.; Meesak, T.; Eiamchai, P. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2017, 320, 97-102
  8. Klingshirn, C. ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 782-803
  9. Kohan, A.; Ceder, G.; Morgan, D.; Van der Walle, C. G. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 19-27
  10. Fang, J.; Fan, H.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chang, Q. Appl Surf Sci 2015, 332, 47-54
  11. Yamamoto, T.; Yoshida, H. Physica B 2001, 302, 155-162
  12. Ebraimifard, R.; Golobostanfard M. R.; Abdizadeh H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 290, 252-259
  13. Serier, H.; Gaudon, M.; Ménétrier, M. Solid State Sci 2009, 11, 1192-1197
  14. Menéndez-Proupin, E.; Palacios, P.; Wahnón, P. Mater Chem Phys 2015, 160, 420-428
  15. Li, X.; Hu, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, D.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Fang, J. Appl. Catal. B-Environ 2016, 195, 29-38
  16. Lee, W.; Shin, S.; Jung, D.; Kim, J.; Nahm, C.; Moon, T.; Park, B. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2012, 12, 628-631
  17. Makuku, O.; Mbaiwa, F.; Sathiaraj, T. S. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 14581-14586
  18. Lung, C.; Toma, M.; Pop, M.; Marconi, D.; Pop, A. J Alloy Compd. 2017, 725, 1238-1243
  19. Huang, J. M.; Ku, C. S.; Lee, H. Y.; Lin, C. M.; Chen, S. Y. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2013, 231, 323-327
  20. Lin, S. S.; Huang, J. L.; Šajgalik, P. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2005, 190, 39-47
  21. Chen, X. L.; Lin, Q.; Ni, J.; Zhang, D. K.; Sun, J.; Zhao, Y.; Geng, X. H. Thin Solid Films 2011, 520, 1263-1267
  22. Yang, T. H.; Wu, J. M. Acta Mater. 2012, 60, 3310-3320
  23. Singh, N.; Pandey, P.; Haque, F. Z. Optik 2012, 123, 1340-1342
  24. Ramakrishna, K. T.; Reddy, T. B. S.; Forbes, I.; Miles, R. W. Surf Coat Tech 2002, 151–152, 110-113
  25. Hong, J.; Matsushita, N.; Kim, K. Thin Solid Films 2013, 531, 238-242
  26. Jongprateep, O.; Meesombad, K.; Techapiesanchareonkij, R.; Surawathanawises, K. Ceram. Int, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.0