Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6

Effect of Al and Ga codoping on the morphological, electronic, and optical properties of ZnO transparent conductive thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis technique

Pages
688–698
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The sheet resistances and electrical resistivity of the AGZO films are significantly lower than those of the 5 at.% Al-doped ZnO films.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Codoping a semiconductor thin film with two or more dopants is a feasible technique to improve the electrical properties of the thin film.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this work, we studied the codoping of Al and Ga n-type impurities in a ZnO film (AGZO) deposited on a glass substrate by the spray pyrolysis method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The sheet resistances and electrical resistivity of the AGZO films are significantly lower than those of the 5 at.% Al-doped ZnO films.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Deposition · semiconductor · thin film

Abstract

Codoping a semiconductor thin film with two or more dopants is a feasible technique to improve the electrical properties of the thin film. In this work, we studied the codoping of Al and Ga n-type impurities in a ZnO film (AGZO) deposited on a glass substrate by the spray pyrolysis method. The total doping concentration, [Al + Ga]/[Al + Ga + Zn], was 5 at.% with varying Al:Ga codoping proportions of 0:5, 1.25:3.75, 2.5:2.5, 3.75:1.25, and 5:0 at.%. The effect of Al/Ga codoping on the structural, texture, morphological, optical, and electrical properties of the AGZO films were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscope (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), UVvisible spectroscopy, and four-point probe technique, respectively. Varying Al:Ga codoping proportions significantly alter the textures and morphologies of the AGZO thin films. Thin films with higher Al doping content exhibit amorphouslike structures due to fine nano grains with high concentrations of disordered grain boundary regions. The optical transmittance spectrums show transmittance higher than 80% in the visible light region for all the codoped films. The sheet resistances and electrical resistivity of the AGZO films are significantly lower than those of the 5 at.% Al-doped ZnO films.

🔖

Cite This Article

SRIPIANEM, W., TECHAPIESANCHAROENKIJ, R. (2018). Effect of Al and Ga codoping on the morphological, electronic, and optical properties of ZnO transparent conductive thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis technique. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6, 688–698. https://ajindex.com/articles/377841

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Tripathy, N.; Ahmad, R.; Song, J. E.; Ko, H. A.; Hahn, Y. B.; Khang, G. Mater. Lett. 2014, 136, 171-174.
  2. Kumar, B.; Kim, S. W. Nano Energy 2012, 1, 342-355.
  3. Wei, S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, M. Sensor Actuat. B-Chem. 2014, 192, 480-487.
  4. Chang, S. P.; Chang, S. J.; Lu, C. Y.; Li, M. J.; Hsu, C. L.; Chiou, Y. Z.; Hsueh, T. J.; Chen, I. C. Superlattice Microst. 2010, 47, 772-778.
  5. Al-Kahlout, A. Thin Solid Films 2012, 520, 1814-1820.
  6. Al-Kahlout, A. M.; El-Ghamri, H. S.; Al Dahoudi, N.; El-Agez, T. M.; Taya, S. A., Abdel-Latif, M. S. Turk. J. Phys. 2015, 39, 272-279
  7. Bu, Y.; Ao, J. P. Green Energy Environ 2017, 2, 331-362.
  8. Techapiesancharoenkij, R.; Sripianem, W.; Tongpul, K.; Peamjharean, C.; Na Wichean, T.; Meesak, T.; Eiamchai, P. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2017, 320, 97-102.
  9. Klingshirn, C. ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 782-803.
  10. Kohan, A.; Ceder, G.; Morgan, D.; Van der Walle, C. G. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 19-27.
  11. Fang, J.; Fan, H.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chang, Q. Appl Surf Sci 2015, 332, 47-54.
  12. Yamamoto, T.; Yoshida, H. Physica B 2001, 302, 155-162.
  13. Ebraimifard, R.; Golobostanfard M. R.; Abdizadeh H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 290, 252-259.
  14. Serier, H.; Gaudon, M.; Ménétrier, M. Solid State Sci 2009, 11, 1192-1197. Menéndez-Proupin, E.; Palacios, P.; Wahnón, P. Mater Chem Phys 2015, 160, 420-428.
  15. Li, X.; Hu, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, D.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Fang, J. Appl. Catal. B-Environ 2016, 195, 29-38.
  16. Lee, W.; Shin, S.; Jung, D.; Kim, J.; Nahm, C.; Moon, T.; Park, B. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2012, 12, 628-631.
  17. Makuku, O.; Mbaiwa, F.; Sathiaraj, T. S. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 14581-14586.
  18. Lung, C.; Toma, M.; Pop, M.; Marconi, D.; Pop, A. J Alloy Compd. 2017, 725, 1238-1243.
  19. Huang, J. M.; Ku, C. S.; Lee, H. Y.; Lin, C. M.; Chen, S. Y. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2013, 231, 323-327.
  20. Lin, S. S.; Huang, J. L.; Šajgalik, P. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2005, 190, 39-47.
  21. Chen, X. L.; Lin, Q.; Ni, J.; Zhang, D. K.; Sun, J.; Zhao, Y.; Geng, X. H. Thin Solid Films 2011, 520, 1263-1267.
  22. Yang, T. H.; Wu, J. M. Acta Mater. 2012, 60, 3310-3320.
  23. Singh, N.; Pandey, P.; Haque, F. Z. Optik 2012, 123, 1340-1342.
  24. Ramakrishna, K. T.; Reddy, T. B. S.; Forbes, I.; Miles, R. W. Surf Coat Tech 2002, 151–152, 110-113.
  25. Hong, J.; Matsushita, N.; Kim, K. Thin Solid Films 2013, 531, 238-242.
  26. Jongprateep, O.; Meesombad, K.; Techapiesanchareonkij, R.; Surawathanawises, K. Ceram. Int, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.108.
  27. Ohring, M. The Materials Science of Thin Films; Academic Press:
  28. San Diego, C