Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6

An improvement of current driving and electrical conductivity properties incovetics

Pages
366–377
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experimental results show the lowest resistivity value accomplished after mixing and temperature annealing as a value of 1.78 10−8 Ω.m, where the covetic sample has 1.27% carbon nanotube density, and that the electrical conductivity is superior to that of Cu-carbon nanotube composites previously reported

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Compared to pure Cu, Cu lattice retaining carbon atoms, called a covetic material, can have better electrical conductivity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, we will discuss interfacial effects on covetic-metal electrodes to meet better current driving performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experimental results show the lowest resistivity value accomplished after mixing and temperature annealing as a value of 1.78 10−8 Ω.m, where the covetic sample has 1.27% carbon nanotube density, and that the electrical conductivity is superior to that of Cu-carbon nanotube composites previously reported
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Compared to pure Cu, Cu lattice retaining carbon atoms, called a covetic material, can have better electrical conductivity. Furthermore, the incorporation of carbon nanostructures into Cu-alloys could improve the mechanical properties of Cu-alloys. In the simulation study, we investigated Joule heating due to applied DC current on molten Cu metal concerning how to improve current density of covetic materials. In addition, we will discuss interfacial effects on covetic-metal electrodes to meet better current driving performance. The covetic composite excited at one electrode (width = 10 nm) has a higher current drive capability as a value of 3.54 107 A/m2 , for 1000 A current at a temperature of 1073.2 K, this value is a constant while temperature is changing up to 1573.2 K. We measured the conductivity of the proposed covetic materials at various carbon nanotube densities at room temperature. Experimental results show the lowest resistivity value accomplished after mixing and temperature annealing as a value of 1.78 10−8 Ω.m, where the covetic sample has 1.27% carbon nanotube density, and that the electrical conductivity is superior to that of Cu-carbon nanotube composites previously reported

🔖

Cite This Article

ORAL, E. A., ATASOYU, M., ERTUGRUL, M. (2022). An improvement of current driving and electrical conductivity properties incovetics. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6, 366–377. https://ajindex.com/articles/613902

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. H. C. Degroh and U. B. Balachandran, “Conductivity of a copper-carbon covetic composite”, NASA/TM 219790 (2018)
  2. R. Scherer, J. Shugart and K. Lafdi, “New class of metallic nanocomposites: Nanocarbon metals”, Materials Science & Technology Conference and Exhibition Ms and T’09 3 (2009) 1828-1835
  3. M. Bakir and I. Jasiuk, “Novel metal-carbon nanomaterials: A review on covetics”, Adv. Mater. Lett 8 (2017) 884-890
  4. R. A. Isaacs, H. I. Jaim, D. P. Cole, K. Gaskell, O. Rabin and L. G. Salamanca-Riba, “Synthesis and characterization of copper-nanocarbon films with enhanced stability”, Carbon 122 (2017) 336-343
  5. U. Balachandran, S. E. Dorris, B. Ma, T. H. Lee, D. R. Forrest and C. Klingshirn, “Electrodes for making nanocarbon-infused metals and alloys”, uS Patent 20200176573 (2020) app. no. 16/209,657
  6. G. L´opez and E. Mittemeijer, “The solubility of c in solid cu”, Scripta Materialia 51 (2004) 1-5
  7. X. Ge, C. Klingshirn, M. Wuttig, K. Gaskell, P. Zavalij, Y. Liang, C. Shumeyko, D. Cole and L. SalamancaRiba, “Mechanism studies and fabrication for the incorporation of carbon into al alloys by the electrocharging assisted process”, Carbon 149 (2019) 203-212
  8. H. I. Jaim, D. P. Cole and L. G. Salamanca-Riba, “Characterization of carbon nanostructures in al and ag covetic alloys”, Carbon 111 (2017) 309-321
  9. C. Subramaniam, A. Sekiguchi, T. Yamada, D. N. Futaba and K. Hata, “Nano-scale, planar and multitiered current pathways from a carbon nanotube–copper composite with high conductivity, ampacity and stability”, Nanoscale 8 (2016) 3888-3894
  10. C. Subramaniam, T. Yamada, K. Kobashi, A. Sekiguchi, D. N. Futaba, M. Yumura and K. Hata, “One hundred fold increase in current carrying capacity in a carbon nanotube–copper composite”, Nature Communications 4 (2013) 1-7
  11. M. T. Byrne and Y. K. Gun’ko, “Recent advances in research on carbon nanotube–polymer composites”, Advanced materials 22 (2010) 1672-1688
  12. P. G. Whitten, A. A. Gestos, G. M. Spinks, K. J. Gilmore and G. G. Wallace, “Free standing carbon nanotube composite bio-electrodes”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 82 (2007) 37–43
  13. W. Zhou, T. Yamaguchi, K. Kikuchi, N. Nomura and A. Kawasaki, “Effectively enhanced load transfer by interfacial reactions in multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforced al matrix composites”, Acta Materialia 125 (2017) 369-376
  14. J. Stallard, W. Tan, F. Smail, T. Gspann, A. Boies and N. Fleck, “The mechanic