Journals / Turkish journal of nephrology (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Approaches of Pediatric Nephrologists to Hypertensive Patients in Turkey (Turkish Pediatric Hypertension Working Group Study)

Pages
110–115
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Despite following recent guidelines, the time spent in the proficiency would change the practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to evaluate the approaches of pediatric nephrologists in our country to the management of childhood hypertension.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The pediatric nephrologists in our country were invited to fill out an online questionnaire including 24 questions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Despite following recent guidelines, the time spent in the proficiency would change the practices.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the approaches of pediatric nephrologists in our country to the management of childhood hypertension. Methods: The pediatric nephrologists in our country were invited to fill out an online questionnaire including 24 questions. The answers were compared between those working in the field for ≤10 years (Group 1, n =74) and >10 years (Group 2, n = 62). Results: Of 136 participants (M/F = 101/35), 52% were following a single guideline [31% Fourth Report of 2004, 17% European Society of Hypertension in 2016, and 52% American Academy of Pediatrics in 2017], which is more common in Group 1 (P = .035). The most commonly used guideline was American Academy of Pediatrics of 2017 and Group 2 used Fourth Report of 2004 more commonly (P = .042). The most common choice to diagnose hypertension was office + home + ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (59%). The frequency of screening for end-organ damage at first evaluation was 96%. The time to wait for the effect of lifestyle modifications was 3 months in 52%. The first choice medication was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (49%) or calcium-channel blockers (48%) in non-obese and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (74%) in obese children. Calcium-channel blockers were more commonly prescribed as the first choice in non-obese children in Group 1 (P = .035). The most accessible emergency drug was esmolol. Conclusion: Despite following recent guidelines, the time spent in the proficiency would change the practices.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAYIN, N., HACIHAMDİOĞLU, D. Ö., TAŞDEMİR, M., DEMİR, B. K., DURSUN, H., GİRİŞGEN, İ., SÖNMEZ, F., ÇİVİLİBAL, M., BIYIKLI, N. K., BENZER, M. (2022). Approaches of Pediatric Nephrologists to Hypertensive Patients in Turkey (Turkish Pediatric Hypertension Working Group Study). Turkish journal of nephrology (Online), Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 110–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/612807

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004;114(2 suppl 4th Report):555-576
  2. Lurbe E, Agabiti-Rosei E, Cruickshank JK, et al. 2016 European Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. J Hypertens. 2016;34(10):1887-1920. [CrossRef] 3. Wühl E, Witte K, Soergel M, Mehls O, Schaefer F, German Working Group on Pediatric Hypertension. Distribution of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in children: normalized reference values and role of body dimensions. J Hypertens. 2002;20(10):1995- 2007. [CrossRef] 4. Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, et al. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3):e20171904. [CrossRef] 5. de Simone G, Daniels SR, Kimball TR, et al. Evaluation of concentric left ventricular geometry in humans: evidence for age-related systematic underestimation. Hypertension. 2005;45(1):64-68. [CrossRef] 6. Khoury PR, Mitsnefes M, Daniels SR, Kimball TR. Age-specific reference intervals for indexed left ventricular mass in children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(6):709-714. [CrossRef] 7. Chinali M, Emma F, Esposito C, et al. Left ventricular mass indexing in infants, children, and adolescents: a simplified approach for the identification of left ventricular hypertrophy in clinical practice. J Pediatr. 2016;170:193-198. [CrossRef] 8. Doyon A, Kracht D, Bayazit AK, et al. Carotid artery intima-media thickness and distensibility in children and adolescents: reference values and role of body dimensions. Hypertension. 2013;62(3):550- 556. [CrossRef] 9. Calabrò MP, Carerj S, Russo MS, et al. Carotid artery intima-media thickness and stiffness index β changes in normal children: role of age, height and sex. J Cardiovasc Med. 2017;18(1):19-27. [CrossRef] 10. Elmenhorst J, Hulpke-Wette M, Barta C, Dalla Pozza R, Springer S, Oberhoffer R. Percentiles for central blood pressure and pulse wave velocity in children and adolescents recorded with an oscillometric device. Atherosclerosis. 2015;238(1):9-16. [CrossRef] 11. Reusz GS, Cseprekal O, Temmar M, et al. Reference values of pulse wave velocity in healthy children and teenagers. Hypertension. 2010;56(2):217-224. [CrossRef] 12. Thurn D, Doyon A, Sözeri B, et al. Aorti