Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 1998 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of two Catheterizable Continence Mechanisms for Urinary Diversion

Pages
167–170
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the light of this result Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve seems to be superior to the nipple valve at higher pouch volumes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve and hipple valve techniques are widely used continent valve systems in recontructive urology, We compared continence, catheterizability and complications of the nipple and Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve ruling out the inherent error of comparing different reservoirs under different conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although the rate of complications such as dessusception and difficult catheterization for each valve are close, leakage of the Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve was observed at significantly higher pouch volumes than in the nipple valve (337. 1±105.4 cc vs. 213. 558.9 cc).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the light of this result Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve seems to be superior to the nipple valve at higher pouch volumes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve · nipple valve · continence.

Abstract

Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve and hipple valve techniques are widely used continent valve systems in recontructive urology, We compared continence, catheterizability and complications of the nipple and Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve ruling out the inherent error of comparing different reservoirs under different conditions. A pouch was constructed with two methods present side by side. Comparable data from each valve were statistically evaluated through Mann-Whitney U test. Although the rate of complications such as dessusception and difficult catheterization for each valve are close, leakage of the Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve was observed at significantly higher pouch volumes than in the nipple valve (337. 1±105.4 cc vs. 213. 558.9 cc). Maximal leak point pressures were not different statistically for both valves, when the pouch filled to the capacity and its half (75.9±35.0 vs 48.4±20.5 and 64.8±28.0 vs 47.3±20.2 respectively). In the light of this result Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve seems to be superior to the nipple valve at higher pouch volumes.

Özet

Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve and hipple valve techniques are widely used continent valve systems in recontructive urology, We compared continence, catheterizability and complications of the nipple and Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve ruling out the inherent error of comparing different reservoirs under different conditions. A pouch was constructed with two methods present side by side. Comparable data from each valve were statistically evaluated through Mann-Whitney U test. Although the rate of complications such as dessusception and difficult catheterization for each valve are close, leakage of the Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve was observed at significantly higher pouch volumes than in the nipple valve (337. 1±105.4 cc vs. 213. 558.9 cc). Maximal leak point pressures were not different statistically for both valves, when the pouch filled to the capacity and its half (75.9±35.0 vs 48.4±20.5 and 64.8±28.0 vs 47.3±20.2 respectively). In the light of this result Benchekroun hydraulic ileal valve seems to be superior to the nipple valve at higher pouch volumes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSAY, A., BOYLU, Ş., AKGÜN, Y., TAÇYILDIZ, İ., ABAN, N., ŞAHİN, H. (2022). Comparison of two Catheterizable Continence Mechanisms for Urinary Diversion. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 167–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/612646

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...