Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2000 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 5

Contralateral white noise-induced enhancement in the Guinea pig's MLR:A possible link to directional hearing

Pages
433–439
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study was undertaken to see whether this enlargement is due simply to an overall, generalised effect of contralateral white noise (WN), or whether it may have some connection to directional hearing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The evoked potential components in a time window of 10-50 ms following an acoustic stimulus are called middle latency responses (MLRs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:A decrease was the result when WN was applied to the same ear as the click.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study was undertaken to see whether this enlargement is due simply to an overall, generalised effect of contralateral white noise (WN), or whether it may have some connection to directional hearing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The evoked potential components in a time window of 10-50 ms following an acoustic stimulus are called middle latency responses (MLRs). It is known that an amplitude enlargement occurs in guinea pig MLRs to monaural clicks when continuous white noise is applied to the other ear. This study was undertaken to see whether this enlargement is due simply to an overall, generalised effect of contralateral white noise (WN), or whether it may have some connection to directional hearing. Recordings were made from chronic guinea pig preparations with epidural electrodes in the temporal regions. Parallel to the results in the literature, an enlargement of the MLR to monaural clicks was seen when WN was at the opposite ear relative to the condition with no WN. A decrease was the result when WN was applied to the same ear as the click. With WN delivered to both ears an increase was observed again. We suggest that these findings, which are not likely to result from a generalised effect of WN over the auditory system, could be explained by a contribution to the MLR from binaural mechanisms which are probably stimulated by the momentary shift of the intra-cranial sound image from the side of the ear receiving the WN to side of the ear receiving the click.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKSOY, C., UTKUÇAL, R. (2022). Contralateral white noise-induced enhancement in the Guinea pig's MLR:A possible link to directional hearing. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 5, 433–439. https://ajindex.com/articles/612407

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Caird D, Klinke R. Processing of interaural time and intensity differences in the cat inferior colliculus. Exp Brain Res 68: 379-392, 1987
  2. Kraus N, Smith DI, McGee T. Midline and temporal lobe MLRs in the guinea pig originate from different generator systems: a conceptual framework for new and existing data. Electroen Clin Neuro 70: 541-558, 1988
  3. McGee T, Kraus N, Comperatore C, Nicol T. Subcortical and cortical components of the MLR generating system. Brain Res 544: 211-220, 1991
  4. McGee T, zdamar, Kraus N. Auditory middle latency responses in the guinea pig. Ann J Otolaryngol 4: 116- 122, 1983
  5. Kraus N, Smith Dl, Grossmann J. Cortical mapping of the auditory middle latency response in the unanesthetized guinea pig. Electroen Clin Neuro 62: 219-226, 1985. 6. zdamar, Kraus N, Grossmann J. Binaural interaction in the auditory middle latency response of the guinea pig. Electroen Clin Neuro 63: 476-483, 1986
  6. Litmann T, Kraus N, McGee T, Nicol T. Binaural stimulation reveals functional differences between midline and temporal components of the middle latency response in guinea pigs. Electroen Clin Neuro 84: 362-372, 1992
  7. Smith DI, Kraus N. Intracranial and extracranial recordings of the auditory middle latency response. Electroen Clin Neuro 71: 296-303, 1988
  8. Dobie RA, Berlin CI. Binaural interaction in brainstem-evoked responses. Arch Otolaryngol 105: 391-398, 1979
  9. Gšksoy C, Utkual R. Binaural interaction component and white-noise enhancement in middle latency responses: differential effects of anaesthesia in guinea pigs. Exp Brain Res 130: 410- 414, 2000
  10. Evans EF, Zhao W. Varieties of inhibition in the processing and control of processing in the mammalian cochlear nucleus. Prog Brain Res 97: 117-126, 1993. 12. da Costa DL, Erre JP, Charlet de Sauvage R, Popel‡_ J, Aran JM. Biolectirical cochlear noise and its contralateral suppression: relation to background activity of the eighth nerve and effects of sedation and anesthesia. Exp Brain Res 116(2): 259-269, 1997
  11. Rosenhammer H, Holmkvist C. Will contralateral white noise interfere with monaurally click-evoked brainstem response? Scand Audiol 12: 11-14, 1983
  12. M¿ller AR. An experimental study of the acoustic impedance of the middle ear and its transmission properties. Acta Otolaryng 60: 129-149, 1965
  13. Schofield BR, Cant NB. Organization of the superior olivary complex in the Guinea pig. J Comp Neurol 314(4): 645-670, 1991
  14. Reiter ER, Liberman MC. Efferent-