Journals / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Kan tüpü kapak renklerinin standardizasyonu laboratuvar dışı personelin tüp seçme hatalarını azaltmada önemli olabilir

Standardization of blood tube closure colors may be important in reducing tube selection errors of non-laboratory personnel

Pages
369–373
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Errors in laboratory medicine contribute significantly to the overall risk of errors in healthcare.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Errors in laboratory medicine contribute significantly to the overall risk of errors in healthcare.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The majority of these laboratory errors occur in the pre-analytical phase.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, standardization of the closure colors of blood tubes should be supported, and non-laboratory personnel drawing blood should be informed when there is a change in the tube closure colors used by the hospital until this standardization is achieved
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Errors in laboratory medicine contribute significantly to the overall risk of errors in healthcare. The majority of these laboratory errors occur in the pre-analytical phase. Control of pre-analytical variables is difficult because many steps are outside the control of the laboratory management. Pre-analytical errors may be reduced by active monitoring and control of all possible errors that are caused by non-laboratory personnel drawing blood, continuous training, use of quality indicators and implementation of standard procedures. Non-laboratory personnel make blood collection tube selection mostly according to the closure color, so standardization of color coding for blood tube closures could help reduce sample collection errors. It is important that European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine calls all stakeholders in the healthcare sector to harmonize color coding for blood collection tube closures. Non-laboratory personnel drawing blood can be taught the additives in blood tubes and their functions to reduce errors during the sample collection stage. In addition, standardization of the closure colors of blood tubes should be supported, and non-laboratory personnel drawing blood should be informed when there is a change in the tube closure colors used by the hospital until this standardization is achieved

Özet

Laboratuvar tıbbındaki hatalar, sağlık bakımındaki genel hata riskine önemli oranda katkıda bulunur. Bu laboratuvar hatalarının çoğunluğu preanalitik safhada oluşur. Pek çok basamağı laboratuvar yönetiminin kontrolü dışında olduğundan preanalitik değişkenlerin kontrolü zordur. Preanalitik hatalar, kan alımı yapan laboratuvar dışı personelin sebep olduğu tüm olası hataların aktif olarak izlenmesi ve kontrolü, sürekli eğitim, kalite göstergelerinin kullanılması ve standart prosedürlerin uygulanması ile azaltılabilir. Laboratuvar dışı personel, kan tüpü seçimini çoğunlukla kapak rengine göre yaptığından kan tüplerinin kapak renginin standardizasyonu örnek toplama hatalarını azaltmaya yardımcı olabilir. Avrupa Klinik Kimya ve Laboratuvar Tıbbı Federasyonu'nun, kan toplama tüplerinin kapaklarının renk kodlamasının uyumlaştırılması için sağlık sektöründeki tüm paydaşlara yaptığı çağrı önemlidir. Örnek toplama aşamasındaki hataları azaltmak için laboratuvar dışı kan alım personeline kan tüplerinin içindeki katkı maddeleri ve onların fonksiyonları öğretilebilir. Ayrıca tüp kapak renklerindeki standardizasyon desteklenmeli ve bu standardizasyon sağlanana kadar hastanenin kullandığı tüp kapak renklerinde değişiklik olduğunda laboratuvar dışı kan alımı yapan personeller bilgilendirilmelidir

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDİN, O. (2022). Kan tüpü kapak renklerinin standardizasyonu laboratuvar dışı personelin tüp seçme hatalarını azaltmada önemli olabilir. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 369–373. https://ajindex.com/articles/611558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aykal G, Yegin A, Aydin O, Yılmaz N, Ellidag HY. The impact of educational interventions on reducing the rejection rates in the preanalytical phase. Turk J Biochem 2014;39:562–6
  2. Simundic AM, Cornes MP, Grankvist K, Lippi G, Nybo M, Ceriotti F, et al. Colour coding for blood collection tube closures-a call for harmonization. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:371–6
  3. Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, Giavarina D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1113–26
  4. Atay A, Demir L, Cuhadar S, Saglam G, Unal H, Aksun S, et al. Clinical biochemistry laboratory rejection rates due to various types of preanalytical errors. Biochem Med 2014;24:376–82
  5. Cuhadar S. Preanalytical variables and factors that interfere with the biochemical parameters: a review. OA Biotech 2013;2:1–7
  6. Guder WG, Naraynan S. (eds) Pre-Examination Procedures in Laboratory Diagnostics. Preanalytical aspects and their impact on the quality of medical laboratory tests. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2015
  7. Sinici Lay I, Pınar A, Akbıyık F. Classification of reasons for rejection of biological specimens based on pre-preanalytical processes to identify quality indicators at a university hospital clinical laboratory in Turkey. Clin Biochem 2014;47:1002–5
  8. Available at: https://www.eflm.eu/files/efcc/selection9IFCCeNewsJune2016%20.pdf. Accessed: 3 Apr 2017
  9. Yüksel H, Kaplan İ, Toprak G, Evliyaoğlu O, Kuş S, Azizoğlu M et al. A questionnaire study among nurses: awareness of blood and urine sample collection procedures. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:e159–61
  10. Ashakiran S, Sumati ME, Krishna Murthy N. A study of preanalytical variables in clinical biochemistry laboratory. Clin Biochem 2011;44:944–5
  11. Englezopoulou A, Kechagia M, Chatzikiriakou R, Kanellopoulou M, Valenti M, Masedu F. Preanalytical errors as quality indicators in clinical laboratory. Austin J Public Health Epidemiol 2016;3:1048.