Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2010 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

Effect of mechanical closure of dead space on seroma formation in modified radical mastectomy

Pages
751–755
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Significance was determined for P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Seroma is an important complication of breast surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were separated into 2 random groups of 50 according to wound closure methods: either flap fixation/mechanical obliteration or standard wound closure group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Significance was determined for P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Seroma · breast cancer · flap fixation

Abstract

Seroma is an important complication of breast surgery. This study investigated the effects of fixation of the flaps and obliterating the dead space on seroma formation. Materials and methods: Patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were separated into 2 random groups of 50 according to wound closure methods: either flap fixation/mechanical obliteration or standard wound closure group. The fluid that collected under the flaps assessed at the physical examination after the drains were removed was accepted as seroma. The patients' characteristics, duration of the operation, drainage amount, removal time of the drains, flap necroses, and infection were recorded. The groups were compared via chi-square and Levene tests. Significance was determined for P

Özet

Seroma is an important complication of breast surgery. This study investigated the effects of fixation of the flaps and obliterating the dead space on seroma formation. Materials and methods: Patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were separated into 2 random groups of 50 according to wound closure methods: either flap fixation/mechanical obliteration or standard wound closure group. The fluid that collected under the flaps assessed at the physical examination after the drains were removed was accepted as seroma. The patients' characteristics, duration of the operation, drainage amount, removal time of the drains, flap necroses, and infection were recorded. The groups were compared via chi-square and Levene tests. Significance was determined for P

🔖

Cite This Article

ATALAY, C., ALTINOK, M., DOĞAN, L., ÖZASLAN, C., YILMAZ, K. B. (2022). Effect of mechanical closure of dead space on seroma formation in modified radical mastectomy. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 751–755. https://ajindex.com/articles/611527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Özdoğan M, Yılmaz KB, Özaslan C, Gürer A, Gülbahar O, Ersoy E. Scalpel versus electrocautery dissections: the effect on wound complications and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in wound fluid. Turk J Med Sci 2008; 38: 111-116.
  2. Kuroi K, Shimozuma K, Tagushi T, İmai H, Yamashiro H, Ohsumi S et al. Effect of mechanical closure of dead space on seroma formation after breast surgery. Breast Cancer 2006; 13: 260-265.
  3. Jeffrey SS, Goodson WH, Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, Bogetz MS. Axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer without axillary drainage. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 909-13. Murphey DR. The use of atmospheric pressure in obliterating axillary dead space following radical mastectomy. South Surg 1947; 13: 372-375. Morris AM. A controlled trial of closed wound suction. Br J Surg. 1973; 60: 357-9.
  4. Chen CY, Hoe AL, Wong CY. The effect of pressure garment on post-surgical drainage and seroma formation in breast cancer patients. Singapore Med J 1998; 39: 412-415. O’Hea BJ, Ho MN, Petrek JA. External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 450-453.
  5. Medl M, Mayerhofer K, Peters-Engl C, Mahrhofer P, Huber S, Buxbaum P et al. The application of fibrin glue after axillary lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of human breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 1996; 15: 2843-2845.
  6. Vaxman F, Kolbe A, Stricher F, Zund D, Volkmar P, Gros D et al. Does fibrin glue improve drainage after axillary lymph node dissection? Prospective and randomized study in humans. Eur J Surg Res 1995; 27: 346-352. 19. Ko E, Han W, Cho J, Lee JW, Kang SY, Jung SY et al. Fibrin glue reduces the duration of lymphatic drainage after lumpectomy and level II or III axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Korean Med Sci. 2009; 24: 92-6
  7. Uden P, Aspergen K, Balldin G, Garne JP, Larsson SA. Fibrin adhesive in radical mastectomy. Eur J Surg. 1993; 159: 263-265.
  8. Burak WE, Goodman PS, Young DC, Farrar WB. Seroma formation following axillary dissection for breast cancer: risk factors and lack of influence of bovine trombin. J Surg Oncol 1997; 64: 27-31.
  9. McCarthy PH, Martin JK, Wells DC, Welch JS, Ilstrup DM. An aborted, prospective, randomized trial of sclerotherapy for prolonged drainage after mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1986; 162: 418-420.
  10. Shamley DR, Barker K, Simonite V, Beardshaw A. Delayed versus immediate exercices following surgery for breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 90: 263-2