Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2010 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 6

Incidence and risk factors for bloodstream infections stemming from temporary hemodialysis catheters

Pages
835–841
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The education of both the patients and medical staff in prevention of CR-BSI is important.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) is considered as an important complication of hemodialysis catheters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: A total of 248 temporary hemodialysis catheters were inserted in 201 patients and remained in situ for a cumulative total of 5192 catheter days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The education of both the patients and medical staff in prevention of CR-BSI is important.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Hemodialysis · temporary hemodialysis catheters · catheter-related infection

Abstract

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) is considered as an important complication of hemodialysis catheters. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of temporary hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection. Materials and methods: Prospective data related to temporary hemodialysis catheters inserted in our institution were collected for duration of three years. The risk factors of CR-BSI of patients between the CR-BSI group and the control group were compared. Results: A total of 248 temporary hemodialysis catheters were inserted in 201 patients and remained in situ for a cumulative total of 5192 catheter days. There were 3254 dialysis sessions. CR-BSI was found in 63 cases. CR-BSI rate was 12.1/1000 catheter-days and 19.4/1000 dialysis sessions. In multivariate analysis, acute renal disease (OR = 2.29), administration of antibiotics at the time of catheterization (OR = 2.09), insertion in the femoral vein (OR = 2.14), emergency situation for catheter insertion (OR = 2.41), high number of catheter manipulation (OR = 2.49), and inadequate hand hygiene prior to catheter manipulations (OR = 3.02) were found to be risk factors of CR-BSI. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (31.3%), S. aureus (26.9%), Enterococcus spp. (10.4%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.0%). Conclusion: This prospective study of temporary hemodialysis catheters has shown high rates of infectious complications. The education of both the patients and medical staff in prevention of CR-BSI is important.

Özet

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) is considered as an important complication of hemodialysis catheters. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of temporary hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection. Materials and methods: Prospective data related to temporary hemodialysis catheters inserted in our institution were collected for duration of three years. The risk factors of CR-BSI of patients between the CR-BSI group and the control group were compared. Results: A total of 248 temporary hemodialysis catheters were inserted in 201 patients and remained in situ for a cumulative total of 5192 catheter days. There were 3254 dialysis sessions. CR-BSI was found in 63 cases. CR-BSI rate was 12.1/1000 catheter-days and 19.4/1000 dialysis sessions. In multivariate analysis, acute renal disease (OR = 2.29), administration of antibiotics at the time of catheterization (OR = 2.09), insertion in the femoral vein (OR = 2.14), emergency situation for catheter insertion (OR = 2.41), high number of catheter manipulation (OR = 2.49), and inadequate hand hygiene prior to catheter manipulations (OR = 3.02) were found to be risk factors of CR-BSI. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (31.3%), S. aureus (26.9%), Enterococcus spp. (10.4%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.0%). Conclusion: This prospective study of temporary hemodialysis catheters has shown high rates of infectious complications. The education of both the patients and medical staff in prevention of CR-BSI is important.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, G., AYDIN, K., ÇAYLAN, R., KÖKSAL, İ., SÖZEN, E. E. (2022). Incidence and risk factors for bloodstream infections stemming from temporary hemodialysis catheters. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 6, 835–841. https://ajindex.com/articles/611474

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Taylor G, Gravel D, Johnston L, Embil J, Holton D, Paton S. Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program; Canadian Hospital Epidemiology Committee. Incidence of bloodstream infection in multicenter inception cohorts of hemodialysis patients. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32:155-60
  2. Kairaitis LK, Gottlieb T. Outcome and complications of temporary haemodialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14:1710-4
  3. Hoen B, Paul-Dauphin A, Hestin D, Kessler M. A multicenter prospective study of risk factors for bacteremia in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998; 9:869-76
  4. Beathard GA. Management of bacteremia associated with tunneled-cuffed hemodialysis catheters. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10:1045-9
  5. Chatzinikolaou I, Finkel K, Hana H, Boktour M, Foringer J, Ho T et al. Antibiotic-coated hemodialysis catheters for the prevention of vascular catheter-related infections: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Med 2003; 115:352-7
  6. Contreras G, Liu PY, Elzinga L, Anger MS, Lee J, Robert N et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, comparative evaluation of dual- versus triple-lumen catheters for hemodialysis and apheresis in 485 patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42:315-24
  7. Saad TF. Bacteremia associated with tunneled, cuffed hemodialysis catheters. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 34:1114-24
  8. Nassar GM, Ayus JC. Infectious complications of the hemodialysis access. Kidney Int 2001; 60:1-13
  9. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL, Heard SO, Maki DG et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002; 51:1-29
  10. Pearson ML. Guideline for prevention of intravascular devicerelated infections. Part I. Intravascular device-related infections: an overview. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1996; 24:262-77
  11. Polderman KH, Girbes AR. Central venous catheter use. Part 2: infectious complications. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:18-28
  12. Marr KA, Sexton DJ, Conlon PJ, Corey GR, Schwab SJ, Kirkland KB. Catheter-related bacteremia and outcome of attempted catheter salvage in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127:275-80
  13. Sherertz RJ, Raad II, Belani A, Koo LC, Rand KH, Pickett DL et al. Three-year experience with sonicated vascular catheter cultures in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28:76-82
  14. Eggimann P, Pittet D. Overview of catheter-r