Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Attitudes and behaviors of physicians in dealing with difficult patients and relatives: a cross-sectional study in two training and research hospitals

Pages
222–233
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Awareness of physicians about the concept of difficult patients and the causes and solutions should be enhanced.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The aim of this study was to examine the reasons constituting the definition of difficult patient and to evaluate attitudes and behaviors of physicians in coping with these patients and their relatives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in May and June 2013 with 400 randomly selected physicians from different specialties working in two training and research hospitals in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Awareness of physicians about the concept of difficult patients and the causes and solutions should be enhanced.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to examine the reasons constituting the definition of difficult patient and to evaluate attitudes and behaviors of physicians in coping with these patients and their relatives. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in May and June 2013 with 400 randomly selected physicians from different specialties working in two training and research hospitals in Ankara. A questionnaire was created by reviewing the relevant literature, by family medicine clinic, and delivered to the physicians following a pilot study. Results: In our study 92.8% of the physicians participating had experienced a negative contact with patients and/or their relatives, previously; 46.8% of the participants stated that they used their own experiences in coping with those situations. The frequency of negative communications was higher in surgical departments, increasing with average daily working hours and number of patients and decreasing with the experience of the physicians. The ways of coping with a difficult patient were nonjudgmental listening, patience, tolerance, and empathy, in declining order of importance. Conclusion: Physicians frequently experience negative communications with patients and/or relatives. Awareness of physicians about the concept of difficult patients and the causes and solutions should be enhanced.

🔖

Cite This Article

TETİK, B. K., ÜSTÜ, Y., SANDIKCI, K. B., IŞIK, D., SANDIKCI, M. M., UĞURLU, M. (2022). Attitudes and behaviors of physicians in dealing with difficult patients and relatives: a cross-sectional study in two training and research hospitals. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 222–233. https://ajindex.com/articles/610563

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Aspegren K. Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine - a review with quality grading of articles. Medical Teacher 1999; 21: 563-570
  2. Brown J. How clinical communication has become a core part of medical education in the UK. Med Educ 2008; 42: 271-278
  3. Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. BMJ 1995; 310: 1122- 1126. 4. Đorđević V, Braš M, Brajković L. Person-centered medical interview. Croat Med J 2012; 53: 310-313
  4. Ong LM, De Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine 1995; 40: 903-918
  5. Zolnierek KB, DiMatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care 2009; 47: 826-834
  6. Maguire P, Pitceathly C. Key communication skills and how to acquire them. BMJ 2002; 325: 697
  7. Haas LJ, Leiser JP, Magill MK, Sanyer ON. Management of the difficult patient. Am Fam Physician 2005; 72: 2063-2068
  8. Kroenke K. Unburdening the difficult clinical encounter. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 333-334
  9. An PG, Rabatin JS, Manwell LB, Linzer M, Brown RL, Schwartz MD. Burden of difficult encounters in primary care: data from the minimizing error, maximizing outcomes study. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 410-414
  10. Lorenzetti RC, Jacques CM, Donovan C, Cottrell S, Buck J. Managing difficult encounters: understanding physician, patient, and situational factors. Am Fam Physician 2013; 87: 419-425
  11. Dhar H, Dhar D. Difficult patient encounters in the developing world. Middle East Journal of Family Medicine 2013; 11: 41-47
  12. Magnus SA, Mick SS. Medical schools, affirmative action and the neglected role of social class. Am J Public Health 2000; 90: 1197-1201
  13. Krebs EE, Garrett JM, Konrad TR. The difficult doctor? Characteristics of physicians who report frustration with patients: an analysis of survey data. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6: 128-135
  14. Elder N, Ricer R, Tobias B. How respected family physicians manage difficult patient encounters. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 533-541
  15. Mathers N, Jones N, Hannay D. Heartsink patients: a study of their general practitioners. Br J Gen Prac 1995; 45: 293-296
  16. An PG, Manwell LB, Williams ES, Laiteerapong N, Brown RL, Rabatin JS, Schwartz MD, Lally PJ, Linzer M. Does a higher frequency of difficult patient encounters lead to lower quality care? J Fam Pract 2013; 62: 24-29
  17. Ratanawongsa N, Roter D, Beach MC, Laird SL, Larson SM, Car