SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF PATIENTS ADMISSING EMERGENCY CARE SERVICES FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF FAMILY MEDICINE

ACİL SERVİSE MÜRACAAT EDEN HASTALARIN AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ BAKIŞ AÇISIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Burcu Kayhan TETİK
Bora TETİK
Aytaç KARAOĞLAN
Cem ALPAĞAN
Nur PAKSOY
Burak METE
Pages
281–289
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data were evaluated by SPSS software version 22 , and the analyses were performed by usingthe Chi-square test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Inappropriate use of Emergency Department (ED) for non-urgent complaints compromises thefunctioning of ED and has been increasing day by day.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we examined the annual data of the patientswho admitted to the Emergency Department in order to determine the ratio of appropriate usage according tothe definitive diagnoses of the patients and to help forward new policies regarding this issue.Materials and Methods: Files of patients, who admitted to our ED between January 1 and December 31 , 2017,were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data were evaluated by SPSS software version 22 , and the analyses were performed by usingthe Chi-square test.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Inappropriate use of Emergency Department (ED) for non-urgent complaints compromises thefunctioning of ED and has been increasing day by day. In this study, we examined the annual data of the patientswho admitted to the Emergency Department in order to determine the ratio of appropriate usage according tothe definitive diagnoses of the patients and to help forward new policies regarding this issue.Materials and Methods: Files of patients, who admitted to our ED between January 1 and December 31 , 2017,were examined. Data were evaluated by SPSS software version 22 , and the analyses were performed by usingthe Chi-square test. A value of p

Özet

Amaç: Acil servislerin gerçek kullanılma nedenleri dışında uygunsuz kullanılması her geçen gün artmakta ve acil servislerin işleyişini bozmaktadır. Çalışmamızda Acil Servise müracaat eden hastaların bir yıllık verileri incelenerek, bu hastaların son tanılarına göre, ne kadarının acil servisleri uygun kullandığını belirlemek ve bu konuda oluşturulacak yeni politikalara yardımcı olmak amaçlanmıştır. Materyal ve Metot: 1 Ocak -31 Aralık 2017 tarihleri arasında hastanemiz acil servisine müracaat eden hastaların dosyaları incelenmiştir. Veriler SPSS 22 programı ile değerlendirilmiş, analizde Ki-kare testi kullanılmıştır. Anlamlılık değeri p

🔖

Cite This Article

TETİK, B. K., TETİK, B., KARAOĞLAN, A., ALPAĞAN, C., PAKSOY, N., METE, B. (2022). EVALUATION OF PATIENTS ADMISSING EMERGENCY CARE SERVICES FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF FAMILY MEDICINE. Ankara Medical Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 281–289. https://ajindex.com/articles/441804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Carret ML, Fassa AC, Domingues MR. Inappropriate use of emergency services: a systematic review of prevalence and associated factors Cad Saude Publica. 2009 Jan;25(1):7- 28
  2. Gill JM. Use of hospital emergency department for non-urgent care: a persistent problem with no easy solutions. Am J Manag Care 1999;5:1565-8
  3. Plauth AE, Pearson SD. Discontinuity of care: urgent care utilization within a health maintenance organization. Am J Manag Care 1998;4:1531-7
  4. Carret ML, Fassa AG, Kawachi İ. Demand for emergency health service: factors associated with inappropriate use BMC Health Services Research 2007;7:131 (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-131)
  5. Roberts E, Mays N. Can primary care and community- based models of emergency care substitute for the hospital accident and emergency (A & E) department? Health Policy 1998;44:191 -214
  6. Cunningham PJ. What accounts for differences in the use of hospital emergency departments across US communities? Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25:324–36
  7. Lowe RA, Localio AR, Schwarz DF, et al. Association between primary care practice characteristics and emergency department use in a Medicaid managed care organization. Med Care. 2005;43:792– 800
  8. Aminzadeh F, Dalziel WB. Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions. Ann Emerg Med 2002;39:238-47. 9. 2017 Yılı Ocak-Ekim Dönemi Acil Servislere İlişkin Veriler: Türkiye Kamu Hastaneleri Genel Müdürlüğü İstatistik, Analiz, Raporlama ve Stratejik Yönetim Dairesi Başkanlığı verileri Aralık 2017. [İnternet]; Available from: https://dosyamerkez.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/23496,2017-ocak-ekim-donemi-acil-servisverileri2pdf.pdf?0 (Erişim tarihi: 13.12.2018)
  9. Wachter R M, Goldman L. The hospitalist movement 5 years later. JAMA 2002;287(4):487-94
  10. Mc Whinney, I. R. ve Freeman, T. (2009). Textbook of Family Medicine. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, Inc
  11. Derlet RW: Overcrowding in emergency departments: increased demand and decreased capacity. Ann Emerg Med 2002;39(4):430-2
  12. Oktay C, Cete Y, Eray O, Pekdemir M, Gunerli A: Appropriateness of emergency department visits in a Turkish university hospital. Croat Med J 2003;44(5):585 -91
  13. Afilalo J, Marinovich A, Afilalo M, Colacone A, Leger R, Unger B, Giguere C: Nonurgent emergency department patient characteristics and barriers to primary care. Acad Emerg Med 2004,11(12):1302 -10
  14. Bianco A, Pileggi C, Angelillo IF. Non-urgent