SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of urinary incontinence and quality of life in married women aged between 20 and 49 years (Sakarya, Turkey)

Kevser ÖZDEMİR
Nebahat ÖZERDOĞAN
Sevil ŞAHİN
Alaattin ÜNSAL
Pages
100–109
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Recurrenturinary tract infection and advancing age were the key risk factors in the development of urinary incontinence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of urinary incontinence and to evaluate the relationship betweenurinary incontinence and quality of life in married women.Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted among married women aged 20–49 years living in the vicinity ofthe Çökekler Community Clinic (Family Health Center) in Sakarya, Turkey, from 1 November 2011 to 15 April 2012.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study groupconsisted of 1161 women.Results: The frequency of urinary incontinence was 71.5% (n = 830).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Recurrenturinary tract infection and advancing age were the key risk factors in the development of urinary incontinence.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of urinary incontinence and to evaluate the relationship betweenurinary incontinence and quality of life in married women.Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted among married women aged 20–49 years living in the vicinity ofthe Çökekler Community Clinic (Family Health Center) in Sakarya, Turkey, from 1 November 2011 to 15 April 2012. The study groupconsisted of 1161 women.Results: The frequency of urinary incontinence was 71.5% (n = 830). Out of a total of 830 patients with symptoms of urinary incontinence,mixed was the most frequently determined type (60.4%), followed by urge (33.9%) and then stress urinary incontinence (5.8%). Themean scores obtained by women with urinary incontinence from the general health perceptions and social functioning domains of theSF-36 survey were lower (P < 0.05 for each domain).Conclusion: Urinary incontinence was found to be a common problem among women, and it affects quality of life adversely. Recurrenturinary tract infection and advancing age were the key risk factors in the development of urinary incontinence.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, K., ÖZERDOĞAN, N., ŞAHİN, S., ÜNSAL, A. (2022). Evaluation of urinary incontinence and quality of life in married women aged between 20 and 49 years (Sakarya, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 100–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/610330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A. The standardization of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardization sub-Committee of The International Continence Society. Urology 2003; 61: 37-49.
  2. Ünsal A, Tozun M, Arslantaş D. Urinary incontinence, related factors and depression among women aged 20 and over in Beylikova District center in Eskişehir. TAF Preventative Medicine Bulletin 2013; 12: 231-242 (in Turkish with abstract in English). Işıklı B, Yenilmez A, Kalyoncu C. Prevalence, risk factors and effects on life quality of urinary incontinence among women aged 18 years or older living in Alpu district of Eskisehir: a population based study. Nobel Med 2011; 7: 34-39 (in Turkish with abstract in English). Bilgili N, Akın B, Ege E, Ayaz S. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and affecting risk factors in women. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences 2008; 28: 487-493 (in Turkish with abstract in English). Oliveira E, Zuliani LM, Ishicava J, Silva SV, Albuquerque SS, de Souza AM, Barbosa CP. Evaluation of factors related to the occurrence of female urinary incontinence. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2010; 56: 688-690.
  3. Stothers L, Friedman B. Risk factors for the development of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep 2011; 12: 363-369.
  4. Can Güler T, Yağcı N. Urinary incontinence in women and physical therapy. Journal of Dumlupınar University Graduate School of Science, 2006; 11: 205-218 (in Turkish with abstract in English). Miller KL. Stress urinary incontinence in women: review and update on neurological control. J Women’s Health (Larchmt) 2005; 14: 595-608.
  5. Lasserre A, Pelat C, Guéroult V, Hanslik T, Chartier-Kastler E, Blanchon T, Ciofu C, Montefiore ED, Alvarez FP, Bloch J. Urinary incontinence in French women: prevalence, risk factors, and impact on quality of life. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 177- 183. Zhu L, Li L, Lang J, Xu T, Wong F. Epidemiology of mixed urinary incontinence in China. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 109: 55-58.
  6. Danforth KN, Townsend MK, Lifford K, Curhan GC, Resnick NM, Grodstein F. Risk factors for urinary incontinence among middle-aged women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 339-345.
  7. Tozun M, Ayranci U, Unsal A. Prevalence of urinary incontinence among women and its impact on quality of life in a semirural area of western Turkey. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2009; 67: 241-249.
  8. Chiaffarino F, Parazzini F, Lavezzari M, Giambanco V; Gruppo Inter disciplinare di