Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 4

Reference values of anthropometric measurements in healthy late preterm and term infants

Pages
862–872
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Percentile values for all measurements of 35–42-week male and female infants were described.Conclusion: These measurements of male and female infants born between 35 and 42 weeks may be useful for early detection ofsyndromes by detecting anatomical abnormalities in our population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Geographical distribution, ethnicity, and other socioeconomic factors may affect anthropometric measurements,and for that reason each society should determine their own measurements accounting for those factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed todetermine the anthropometric measurements of healthy late preterm and term infants to compare the results with other national andinternational studies.Materials and methods: This sectional study was carried out among 1197 infants born with a gestational age of ≥35 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Percentile values for all measurements of 35–42-week male and female infants were described.Conclusion: These measurements of male and female infants born between 35 and 42 weeks may be useful for early detection ofsyndromes by detecting anatomical abnormalities in our population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Geographical distribution, ethnicity, and other socioeconomic factors may affect anthropometric measurements,and for that reason each society should determine their own measurements accounting for those factors. In this study, we aimed todetermine the anthropometric measurements of healthy late preterm and term infants to compare the results with other national andinternational studies.Materials and methods: This sectional study was carried out among 1197 infants born with a gestational age of ≥35 weeks. Chestcircumference, ear length, foot length, palmar length, middle finger length, philtrum distance, inner and outer canthal distances, andpalpebral fissure length were measured in the first 24 h of life.Results: All measurements of late preterm infants were smaller than those of term infants (P ˂ 0.05). Compared with male infants, the chestcircumference, ear length, foot length, palmar length, philtrum distance, and inner canthal distances of the female infants were lower (P ˂0.05). No significant differences were found between male and female infants’ middle finger length, outer canthal distance, and palpebralfissure length measurements. Percentile values for all measurements of 35–42-week male and female infants were described.Conclusion: These measurements of male and female infants born between 35 and 42 weeks may be useful for early detection ofsyndromes by detecting anatomical abnormalities in our population.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖROĞLU, Ö. A., YALAZ, M., AKISÜ, M., KÜLTÜRSAY, N., UYGUR, Ö., BİLGİN, B. S., TEREK, D., ÇOĞULU, Ö. (2022). Reference values of anthropometric measurements in healthy late preterm and term infants. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 4, 862–872. https://ajindex.com/articles/610151

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Feingold M, Bossert WH. Normal values for selected physical parameters: an aid to syndrome delineation. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1974; 10: 1-16. Jones KL. Pattern of malformation differential diagnosis by anomalies. In: Jones KL, editor. Smith’s Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier Saunders; 2006. pp. 865-936. Hall JG. Why measurements are useful. In: Hall JG, editor. Handbook of Normal Physical Measurements. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2007. pp. 5-12.
  2. Sulkes SB, Dosa NP. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. In: Behrman RE. Nelson Essentials of Pediatrics. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: WB Saunders; 2002. pp. 1-56.
  3. Neyzi O, Saka HN. Anthropometric studies in Turkish children. İstanbul Medical Faculty Journal 2002; 65: 221-228.
  4. Sivan Y, Merlob P, Reisner S. Sternum length, torso length, and internipple distance in newborn infants. Pediatr 1983; 72: 523- 525. Goto E. Meta-analysis: identification of low birthweight by other anthropometric measurements at birth in developing countries. J Epidemiol 2011; 21: 354-362.
  5. Telatar B, Comert S, Vitrinel A, Erginöz E. Anthropometric measurements of term neonates from a state hospital in Turkey. East Mediterr Health J 2009; 15: 1412-1419.
  6. Merlob P, Sivan Y, Reisner SH. Anthropometric measurements of the newborn infant (27 to 41 gestational weeks). Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1984; 20: 1-52.
  7. Kalcioglu MT, Toplu Y, Ozturan O, Yakinci C. Anthropometric growth study of auricle of healthy preterm and term newborns. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 121-127.
  8. Karakaş S, Karul A, Altınışık M, Türkmen MK, Tellioğlu AM, Aslan DK. Craniofacial measurements of newborns born in term in Aydın and relations with leptin and IGF-1. ADÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2012; 13: 1-9 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English). Malas MA, Ataş E. Foot morphology in premature and term infants. Genel Tıp Dergisi 1998; 8: 99-103 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English). Ho TY, Ou SF, Huang SH, Lee CN, Ger LP, Hsieh KS, Huang SM, Weng KP. Assessment of growth from foot length in Taiwanese neonates. Pediatr Neonatol 2009; 50: 287-290.
  9. Malas MA, Doğan Ş, Evcil EH, Desticioğlu K. An investigation of the ratio between second and fourth fingers in between newborn and five years children and between 16 and 60 years adults. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2008; 15: 15-22 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English). Halder D, Dharap AS,