Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Necessity of Electroencephalography in High-risk Brief Resolved Unexplained Event

Pages
336–341
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, even in the high-risk BRUE group, it would be costeffective to perform an EEG if only the clinical cues are strongly suggestive for the diagnosis of epilepsy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: A brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) is characterized by sudden alterations in an infant’s breathing, color, tone, or responsiveness.The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity of electroencephalography (EEG) in high-risk BRUE cases.Materials and Methods: Fifty-one patients’ cases were analyzed retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All of these patients were younger than 1 month soconsidered to be a high-risk group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, even in the high-risk BRUE group, it would be costeffective to perform an EEG if only the clinical cues are strongly suggestive for the diagnosis of epilepsy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: A brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) is characterized by sudden alterations in an infant’s breathing, color, tone, or responsiveness.The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity of electroencephalography (EEG) in high-risk BRUE cases.Materials and Methods: Fifty-one patients’ cases were analyzed retrospectively. All of these patients were younger than 1 month soconsidered to be a high-risk group. The gestational week, the age of the patient, the duration of the event, the conditions related to the event,whether or not any intervention was needed, the type of intervention if done, if the event recurred, the number of recurrences, the state ofconsciousness during the event, respiratory pattern, muscle tone, sleeping position, suspicion of trauma, use of medication by mother and/or baby and smoking exposure were evaluated in detail.Results: The mean age of the patients was 15.74±14.96 days, 31 (60.78%) were male and 20 (39.21%) were female. The mean gestational agewas 37.64±2.35 weeks. The neurological examinations of the patients were evaluated as normal. EEG was performed in 36 (70.58%) of the 51patients and only one patient had sharp waves in the left hemisphere central region. In 11 patients hospitalized with a preliminary diagnosisof BRUE, final diagnoses were found as congenital pyloric stenosis, dehydration, fetal myocarditis, patent ductus arteriosus, lower respiratorytract infection and gastroesophageal reflux.Conclusion: It would be more appropriate to plan the tests to be carried out in the high-risk BRUE group by evaluating many factors such asrecurrence of the event, family history, and neurological examination findings. As a result, even in the high-risk BRUE group, it would be costeffective to perform an EEG if only the clinical cues are strongly suggestive for the diagnosis of epilepsy.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERİN, H. M., ŞİMŞEK, E., KÖROĞLU, Ö. A., KANMAZ, S., ÇETİN, İ. D., TEREK, D., YILMAZ, S., AKTAN, G., TEKGÜL, H., KÜLTÜRSAY, N., GÖKBEN, S. (2019). Necessity of Electroencephalography in High-risk Brief Resolved Unexplained Event. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 336–341. https://ajindex.com/articles/362891

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Brand DA, Fazzari MJ. Risk of death in infants who have experienced a brief unexplained event: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr 2018;197:63-7
  2. Tieder JS, Bonkowsky JL, Etzel RA, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: brief resolved unexplained events (formerly apparent life-threatening events) and evaluation of lower-risk infants. Pediatrics 2016;137:e20160590
  3. Genizi J, Pillar G, Ravid S, Shahar E. Apparent life-threatening events: neurological correlates and the mandatory work-up. J Child Neurol 2008; 23:1305-7
  4. Bonkowsky JL, Guenther E, Filloux FM, Srivastava R. Death, child abuse, and adverse neurological outcome of infants after an apparentlifethreatening event. Pediatrics 2008;122:125-31
  5. McGovern MC, Smith MB. Causes of apparent life threatening events in infants: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:1043-8
  6. Hewertson J, Poets CF, Samuels MP, Boyd SG, Neville BG, Southall DP. Epileptic seizure-induced hypoxemia in infants with apparent life-threatening events. Pediatrics 1994;94:148- 56
  7. Nunes ML, Appel CC, da Costa JC. Apparent life-threatening episodes as the first manifestation of epilepsy. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2003;42:19-22
  8. Tirosh E, Jaffe M. Apparent life-threatening event: a neurologic perspective. J Child Neurol 1995; 10:216-8
  9. Fuger M, Merdariu D, Maurey H, Kaminska A, Chéron G. Relevance of electroencephalography in infants presenting to an emergency department who have had an apparent lifethreatening event. Arch Pediatr 2014;21:1206-12
  10. Leone MA, Solari A, Beghi E. First Seizure Trial (FIRST) Group. Treatment of the first tonic-clonic seizure does not affect longterm remission of epilepsy. Neurology 2006;67:2227-9
  11. Musicco M, Beghi E, Solari A, Viani F. First Seizure Trial (FIRST) Group. Treatment of first tonic-clonic seizure does not improve the prognosis of epilepsy. Neurology 1997;49:991-8.