Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6

Rasch analysis of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Turkish version, validity, and reliability study

Pages
1760–1765
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, there was a correlation between NBQ/F2 and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (r = 0.552) and BeckAnxiety Inventory (BAI) (r = 0.410).Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire is valid and reliable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The multidimensional evaluation of patients with chronic neck pain is important for planning the treatment program.The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire(NBQ).Materials and methods: The internal construct validity of the NBQ was examined by the fit of the data to the Rasch measurementmodel.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The reliability of the NBQ in terms of both internal consistency andtest-retest reliability was assessed by the person separation index (PSI) and differential item functioning (DIF) by time effect.Results: It was determined that the questionnaire has 2 factors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, there was a correlation between NBQ/F2 and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (r = 0.552) and BeckAnxiety Inventory (BAI) (r = 0.410).Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire is valid and reliable.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The multidimensional evaluation of patients with chronic neck pain is important for planning the treatment program.The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire(NBQ).Materials and methods: The internal construct validity of the NBQ was examined by the fit of the data to the Rasch measurementmodel. External validity of the NBQ was evaluated by testing for expected associations of Rasch transformed NBQ score with thecorresponding variables through the process of convergent validity. The reliability of the NBQ in terms of both internal consistency andtest-retest reliability was assessed by the person separation index (PSI) and differential item functioning (DIF) by time effect.Results: It was determined that the questionnaire has 2 factors. None of the items of Factor 1 (F1) and Factor 2 (F2) showed DIF. Thereliability of F1 (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89, PSI = 0.87) and F2 (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.77, PSI = 0.87) was good with Cronbach’s alpha andPSI. There was a good correlation between NBQ/F1 and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) (r = 0.673) and Neck Pain and Disability Scale(NPDS) (r = 0.709). Also, there was a correlation between NBQ/F2 and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (r = 0.552) and BeckAnxiety Inventory (BAI) (r = 0.410).Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire is valid and reliable.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜLGER, Ö., ASLIYÜCE, Y. Ö., GÖKMEN, D. (2022). Rasch analysis of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Turkish version, validity, and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6, 1760–1765. https://ajindex.com/articles/610084

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Goubert L, Crombez G, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Low back pain, disability and back pain myths in a community sample: prevalence and interrelationships. European Journal of Pain 2004
  2. 8 (4): 385-394. doi: /10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.11.004 2. Daffner SD, Hilibrand AS, Hanscom BS, Brislin BT, Vaccaro AR et al. Impact of neck and arm pain on overall health status. Spine 2003
  3. 28 (17): 2030-2035. doi: 10.1097/01. BRS.0000083325.27357.39 3. Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L, Kruger A. An epidemiologic comparison of pain complaints. Pain 1988
  4. 32 (2): 173-183. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90066-8 4. Bolton JE, Humphreys BK. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2002
  5. 25 (3): 141-148. doi: 10.1067/ mmt.2002.123333 5. Gunaydin G, Citaker S, Meray J, Cobanoglu G, Gunaydin OE et al. Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire. Spine 2016
  6. 41 (21): E1292-E1297. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001599 6. Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, Erdogan C. Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004
  7. 26 (16): 959-962. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001696755 7. Aslan E, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek IE et al. The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine 2008
  8. 33 (11): E362-E365. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817144e1 8. Canel-Çınarbaş D, Cui Y, Lauridsen E. Cross-cultural validation of the beck depression inventory–II across US and Turkish samples. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 2011
  9. 44 (2): 77-91. doi: 10.1177/0748175611400289 9. Ulusoy M, Sahin NH, Erkmen H. Turkish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory: psychometric properties. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 1998
  10. 12 (2): 163-172. 10. Yılmaz ÖT, Yakut Y, Uygur F, Uluğ N. Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 2011
  11. 22 (1): 44-49 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). 11. Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 1991
  12. 14 (7): 409-415. 12. Wheeler AH, Goolkasian P, Baird AC, Darden BV 2nd. Development of the Neck Pain