Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome

Pages
249–257
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

During the procedure, a dura rupture developed in fourpatients in the stabilization group and in two patients in the nonstabilization group; however, none of these patients developed a spinalheadache and no significant permanent complication arose.Conclusion: We suggest that epidural adhesiolysis, hyaluronidase, and steroid injection in patients with FBSS chronic low back painand/or radicular symptoms may give reliable information about the quality of life, accuracy of diagnosis, and the possible course of thepresent findings and may be more effective in nonstabilized patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: We aimed to compare the results of the treatment of the patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) bymechanical lysis and steroid hylase injection via epiduroscopy due to their stabilization status and to detect the effect of pathologicaldiagnostic markers on prognosis and ongoing treatment protocol.Materials and methods: Eighty-two patients with FBSS symptoms were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All patients were evaluated using the oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS)scores before and after treatment at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and using the patient satisfaction scale at 12 months following treatment.Epidural scar tissue visual and mechanical signs were also recorded.Results: Mean VAS scores were 7.8 and 3.28 points in group I (P < 0.001) and 7.51 and 2.74 points in group II (P < 0.001) at thebeginning and at 12 months, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:During the procedure, a dura rupture developed in fourpatients in the stabilization group and in two patients in the nonstabilization group; however, none of these patients developed a spinalheadache and no significant permanent complication arose.Conclusion: We suggest that epidural adhesiolysis, hyaluronidase, and steroid injection in patients with FBSS chronic low back painand/or radicular symptoms may give reliable information about the quality of life, accuracy of diagnosis, and the possible course of thepresent findings and may be more effective in nonstabilized patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: We aimed to compare the results of the treatment of the patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) bymechanical lysis and steroid hylase injection via epiduroscopy due to their stabilization status and to detect the effect of pathologicaldiagnostic markers on prognosis and ongoing treatment protocol.Materials and methods: Eighty-two patients with FBSS symptoms were included. Two groups were composed as group I (stabilized)and group II (nonstabilized). All patients were evaluated using the oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS)scores before and after treatment at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and using the patient satisfaction scale at 12 months following treatment.Epidural scar tissue visual and mechanical signs were also recorded.Results: Mean VAS scores were 7.8 and 3.28 points in group I (P < 0.001) and 7.51 and 2.74 points in group II (P < 0.001) at thebeginning and at 12 months, respectively. Mean ODI scores were 34.05 and 22.16 points in group I (P < 0.001) and 30.74 and 19.46points in group II (P < 0.001) at the beginning and at 12 months. VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly in both groups, but weremore significant in the nonstabilized group (P < 0.001). Moderate or severe fibrous tissue was observed in 86.58% of the patients andpatient satisfaction scores were very good or good in 78.06% of the patients. During the procedure, a dura rupture developed in fourpatients in the stabilization group and in two patients in the nonstabilization group; however, none of these patients developed a spinalheadache and no significant permanent complication arose.Conclusion: We suggest that epidural adhesiolysis, hyaluronidase, and steroid injection in patients with FBSS chronic low back painand/or radicular symptoms may give reliable information about the quality of life, accuracy of diagnosis, and the possible course of thepresent findings and may be more effective in nonstabilized patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, A., ÖZGENCİL, G. E., AŞIK, İ., ERKEN, B. (2022). Evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 249–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/609948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Van Goethem JW, Parizel PM, Jinkins JR. Postoperative lumbar spine MR. Neuroradiology 2002; 44: 723-739
  2. Rahimzadeh P, Sharma V, Imani F, Faiz HR, Ghodraty MR, Nikzad-Jamnani AR. Adjuvant hyaluronidase to epidural steroid improves the quality of analgesia in failed back surgery syndrome: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Pain Physician 2014; 17: 75-82
  3. Kim SB, Lee KW, Lee JH, Kim MA, An BW. The effect of hyaluronidase in interlaminar lumbar epidural injection for failed back surgery syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med 2012; 36: 466473
  4. Heavner JE, Cholkhavatia S, Kizelshteyn G. Percutaneous evaluation of the epidural and subarachnoid space with the flexible fiberscope. Reg Anesth 1991; 16: 85
  5. Silva MC, Viola A. Epiduroscopy in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 2: 21
  6. Hogan QH. Lumbar epidural anatomy. A new look by cryomicrotome section. Anesthesiology 1991; 75: 767-775
  7. Wiltse LL, Fonseca AS, Amster J, Dimartino P, Ravessoud FA. Relationship of the dura, Hofmann’s ligaments, batson plexus, and a fibrovascular membrane lying on the posterior surface of the vertebral bodies and attaching to the deep layer of the posterior longitudinal ligament: an anatomical, radiology and clinical study. Spine 1993; 18: 1030-1043
  8. Bosscher HA, Heavner JE. Lumbosacral epiduroscopy findings predict treatment outcome. Pain Pract 2014; 14: 506-514
  9. Bosscher HA, Heavner JE. Incidence and severity of epidural fibrosis after back surgery: an endoscopic study. Pain Pract 2010; 10: 18-24
  10. Mizuno J, Gauss T, Suzuki M, Hayashida M, Arita H, Hanaoka K. Encephalopathy und rhabdomyolysis provoquees iotrolan durant epiduroscopie. J Anaesth 2007: 54; 49-53 (in Luxembourgish)
  11. Schütze G. Epiduroscopy: Spinal Endoscopy. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009
  12. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, Sage Publications Ltd. ©2013, 4th edition, Andy Field, pp. 745-780
  13. Takeshima N, Miyakawa H, Okuda K, Hattori S, Hagiwara S, Takatani J, Noguchi T. Evaluation of the therapeutic results of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis for failed back surgery syndrome. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 400-407
  14. Geurts JW, Kallewaard JW, RichardsonJ, Groen GJ. Targeted methylprednisolone acetate/hyaluronidase/clonidin einjection after diagnostic epiduroscopyfor chronic sciatica: a prospective, 1-year follow-up study. Reg Anesth PainMed 2002; 27: 343-352
  15. Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RCA, Petrie JL, Obuch