Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of mesenchymal stem cell sheets and chondrocyte sheets in a rabbit growth plate injury model

Pages
1082–1096
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Transplanted cells were observed in the damaged area in bothof the groups, which differentiated in the direction of growth plate cartilage.Conclusion: Our results support the hypothesis that MSC or chondrocyte transplantation using the cell-sheet technique described inthe present study aids in the regeneration of cartilage tissue during physeal arrest after growth plate damage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The treatment of posttraumatic deformities and differences in length between the extremities resulting from physealinjury remains controversial.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We found significant differences in radiological evaluations between preand posttreatment measurements in both MSC and chondrocyte groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Transplanted cells were observed in the damaged area in bothof the groups, which differentiated in the direction of growth plate cartilage.Conclusion: Our results support the hypothesis that MSC or chondrocyte transplantation using the cell-sheet technique described inthe present study aids in the regeneration of cartilage tissue during physeal arrest after growth plate damage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The treatment of posttraumatic deformities and differences in length between the extremities resulting from physealinjury remains controversial. The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy of tissue-engineered, monolayer, and allogeneicmesenchymal stem cell sheets and chondrocyte sheets for physeal arrest treatment and to investigate cell sheet technology as a novelmethod for cell transplantation in physeal cartilage repair.Materials and methods: A proximal tibial physeal injury was induced in New Zealand rabbits. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells(MSCs) and chondrocytes were cultured in temperature-responsive culture dishes and applied to the iatrogenic partial growth platedefects in single-sheet grafts (cell sheets). Treatment efficacy was determined using radiological measurements, as well as histologicaland immunohistochemical staining.Results: Treatment with MSCs and chondrocytes prevented endochondral ossification in the physeal plate, and bone growth resumedafter treatment in both the MSC and chondrocyte cell groups. We found significant differences in radiological evaluations between preand posttreatment measurements in both MSC and chondrocyte groups. Transplanted cells were observed in the damaged area in bothof the groups, which differentiated in the direction of growth plate cartilage.Conclusion: Our results support the hypothesis that MSC or chondrocyte transplantation using the cell-sheet technique described inthe present study aids in the regeneration of cartilage tissue during physeal arrest after growth plate damage.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAÖZ, E., GÜLTEKİN, A., AĞIRDİL, Y., DUMAN, B. Ö., DEMİR, C. S. (2022). Comparison of mesenchymal stem cell sheets and chondrocyte sheets in a rabbit growth plate injury model. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 1082–1096. https://ajindex.com/articles/609854

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Bright RW. Physeal injuries. In: Rockwood CA, Wilkins KE, King RE (editors). Fractures in children, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: JB Lippincott; 1984. pp. 87-167
  2. Flynn JM, Skaggs DL, Waters PM. Rockwood and Wilkins’ Fractures in Children. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. pp. 1288
  3. Mizuta T, Benson W, Foster B, Morris L. Statistical analysis of the incidence of physeal injuries. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 1987; 7 (5): 518-523
  4. Klassen RA, Peterson MA. Excision of physeal bars: the Mayo Clinic experience 1968-1978. Orthopaedic Transactions 1982; 6: 65
  5. Lee EH, Gao GX, Bose K. Management of partial growth arrest: physis, fat, or silastic? Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 1993; 13 (3): 368-372
  6. Macksoud WS, Bright R. Bar resection and silastic interposition in distal radial physeal arrest. Orthopaedic Transactions 1989; 13: 1-2
  7. Foster BK, Hansen AL, Gibson GJ, Hopwood JJ, Binns GF et al. Reimplantation of growth plate chondrocytes into growth plate defects in sheep. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 1990; 8 (4): 555-564. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100080412 8. Tobita M, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Mori R, Iwasa J et al. Treatment of growth plate injury with autogenous chondrocytes. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 2002; 73 (3): 352-358. doi: 10.1080/000164702320155383 9. Hui JH, Li L, Teo YH, Ouyang HW, Lee EH. Comparative study of the ability of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, periosteum, and adipose tissue in treatment of partial growth arrest in rabbit. Tissue Engineering 2005; 11 (5-6): 904- 912. doi: 10.1089/ten.2005.11.904 10. Yoshida K, Higuchi C, Nakura A, Nakamura N, Yoshikawa H. Treatment of partial growth arrest using an in vitrogenerated scaffold-free tissue-engineered construct derived from rabbit synovial mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 2012; 32 (3): 314-321. doi: 10.1097/ BPO.0b013e31824afee3 11. Azarpira MR, Shahcheraghi GH, Ayatollahi M, Geramizadeh B. Tissue engineering strategy using mesenchymal stem cellbased chitosan scaffolds in growth plate surgery: a preliminary study in rabbits. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2015; 101 (5): 601-605. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.04.010 12. Elloumi‐Hannachi I, Yamato M, Okano T. Cell sheet engineering: a unique nanotechnology for scaffold‐free tissue reconstruction with clinical applications in regenerative medicine. Journal of Internal Medicine 2010; 267 (1): 54-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2796.2009.02185.x 13. Iwata T,