SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Comparing the complications of laparoscopically performed simple, radical and donor nephrectomy

Erkan ÖLÇÜCÜOĞLU
Pages
922–929
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it is important todetermine the frequency of complications using a standardized classification in order to enable correct interpretation of results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bacground/aim: The aim of this study was to compare the complications of laparoscopic simple, radical and donor nephrectomiesperformed in a single center.Materials and methods: The study was conducted on 392 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy in University of HealthSciences, Ankara Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital between January 1, 2008 and January 30, 2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All analyses were performed on SPSS v21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).Results: The mean age of the patients was 49.13 ± 15.45 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it is important todetermine the frequency of complications using a standardized classification in order to enable correct interpretation of results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Bacground/aim: The aim of this study was to compare the complications of laparoscopic simple, radical and donor nephrectomiesperformed in a single center.Materials and methods: The study was conducted on 392 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy in University of HealthSciences, Ankara Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital between January 1, 2008 and January 30, 2019. Clinical andlaboratory parameters were recorded. Postoperative complications were recorded and graded as per Clavien-Dindo classification(CDC). All analyses were performed on SPSS v21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).Results: The mean age of the patients was 49.13 ± 15.45 years. The frequency of comorbidities and ASA scores were significantly higherin the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) group than in the other groups (P < 0.001). Amount of bleeding was significantlylower in the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) group compared to the other groups (P < 0.001). Classification of complicationsaccording to CDC showed that complications occurred in 17.01% (n = 25) of the LRN group, 7.02% (n = 12) of the laparoscopic simplenephrectomy (LSN) group, and 2.70% (n = 2) of the LDN group. Length of stay in hospital was significantly higher in the LRN groupthan in the LSN group (P < 0.001).Conclusion: In this study, the frequency of complications in LRN procedures was found to be higher than the LSN and LDN procedures.Patients with LRN may have more adverse health conditions before the operation. Considering the results of this study, variables suchas patient and hospital characteristics, surgeon experience and skills should be evaluated in future studies. In addition, it is important todetermine the frequency of complications using a standardized classification in order to enable correct interpretation of results.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖLÇÜCÜOĞLU, E. (2022). Comparing the complications of laparoscopically performed simple, radical and donor nephrectomy. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 922–929. https://ajindex.com/articles/609689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Gill IS. Textbook of laparoscopic urology. London, UK: Informa Health Care; 2006
  2. Al-Kandari A, Gill IS. Difficult conditions in laparoscopic urologic surgery. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2010
  3. De Cassai A, Boscolo A, Tonetti T, Ban I, Ori C. Assignment of ASA-physical status relates to anesthesiologists’ experience: a survey-based national-study Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2019; 72 (1): 53-59. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00224 4. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 1992; 111 (5): 518-526
  4. Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Biyani CS, Bjerggaard Jensen J, Roupret M et al. Validation of the Clavien-Dindo grading system in urology by the European Association of urology guidelines ad hoc panel. European Urology Focus 2018; 4 (4): 608-613. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.014 6. Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Annals of Surgery 2009; 250 (2): 187-196. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 7. Siqueira Jr TM, Kuo RL, Gardner TA, Paterson RF, Stevens LH et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. Journal of Urology 2002; 168 (4 Pt 1): 1361-1365. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000023288.55478.42 8. Elsamra S, Pareek G. Complications of laparoscopic renal surgery. International Journal of Urology 2010; 17 (3): 206-214. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02446.x 9. Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Frede T, Loening SA. Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers. Journal of Urology 1999; 162 (3 Pt 1): 765-771. doi: 10.1097/00005392- 199909010-00038 10. Gomella LG, Albala DM. Laparoscopic urological surgery: 1994. British Journal of Urology 1994; 74 (3): 267-273. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb16608.x 11. Xu H, Ding Q, Jiang HW. Fewer complications after laparoscopic nephrectomy as compared to the open procedure with the modified Clavien classification system--a retrospective analysis from southern China. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2014; 12: 242. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-242 12. Garg M, Singh V, Sinha RJ, Sharma P. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy. Urology 2014; 84 (2): 335-339. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.038 13. Permpongkosol S, Link RE, Su LM, Romero FR, Bagga HS et al.