Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

Dermoscopy of oral mucocele: three types of extravasation mucoceles

Pages
96–102
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Dermoscopically, 40% of extravasationmucoceles were classified as type 1 (8 patients), 25% as type 2 (5 patients), and 35% as type 3 (7 patients).Conclusion: We concluded that there are 3 types of extravasation mucoceles dermoscopically and clinically, and these types may bestages of transition between each other.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Dermoscopy is a diagnostic tool that assists in imaging the epidermis and dermis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thisstudy aimed to investigate whether dermoscopy is a valuable tool in diagnosing oral mucoceles.Materials and methods: In this study, the clinical and dermoscopic features of 21 oral mucocele lesions of 21 patients (11 females, 10males) aged between 6 and 38 years who were confirmed histopathologically were evaluated.Results: Of the lesions studied, 95.2% (20) were extravasation and 4.8% (1) were retention mucoceles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Dermoscopically, 40% of extravasationmucoceles were classified as type 1 (8 patients), 25% as type 2 (5 patients), and 35% as type 3 (7 patients).Conclusion: We concluded that there are 3 types of extravasation mucoceles dermoscopically and clinically, and these types may bestages of transition between each other.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Dermoscopy is a diagnostic tool that assists in imaging the epidermis and dermis. Although it has also started to beused to diagnose nonmelanocytic lesions recently, it has not been tested much on oral mucosal masses, such as oral mucoceles. Thisstudy aimed to investigate whether dermoscopy is a valuable tool in diagnosing oral mucoceles.Materials and methods: In this study, the clinical and dermoscopic features of 21 oral mucocele lesions of 21 patients (11 females, 10males) aged between 6 and 38 years who were confirmed histopathologically were evaluated.Results: Of the lesions studied, 95.2% (20) were extravasation and 4.8% (1) were retention mucoceles. The nonvascular structureswere determined as white areas (61.9%, 13), erythema (57.1%, 12), purplish-gray background (52.3%, 11), ulcer (30%, 8), yellowishorangeareas (23.8%, 5), crust (14.2%, 3), starburst pattern (0.95%, 2), and bleeding (0.47%, 1). Dermoscopically, 40% of extravasationmucoceles were classified as type 1 (8 patients), 25% as type 2 (5 patients), and 35% as type 3 (7 patients).Conclusion: We concluded that there are 3 types of extravasation mucoceles dermoscopically and clinically, and these types may bestages of transition between each other.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYHAN, E., AKKAYNAK, Ş., TOPRAK, S. F., KAYA, Ş. (2022). Dermoscopy of oral mucocele: three types of extravasation mucoceles. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 96–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/609683

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Tandon A, Sircar K, Chowdhry A, Bablani D. Salivary duct cyst on lower lip: A rare entity and literature review. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology 2014; 18: 151-156
  2. Santosh HN, Nagaraj T, Bose A, Sasidharan A. Atypical clinical presentation of oral mucocele. International Journal of Medical and Dental Case Reports 2014: 1-3
  3. Rao PK, Hegde D, Shetty SR, Chatra L, Shenai P. Oral mucocele–diagnosis and management. Journal of Dentistry, Medicine and Medical Sciences 2012; 2: 26-30
  4. Ata-Ali J, Carrillo C, Bonet C, Balaguer J, Peñarrocha M et al. Oral mucocele: review of literature. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 2010; 2: 18-21
  5. Nallasivam KU, Sudha BR. Oral mucocele: review of literature and a case report. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 2015; 7: 731-733
  6. Bermejo A, Aguirre JM, Lopez P, Saez M. Superficial mucocele. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology 1999; 88 (4): 469-472
  7. Laskaris G. Color Atlas of Oral Diseases in Children and Adolescents. New York, NY, USA: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc.; 2000
  8. Adachi P, Pires-Soubhia AM, Horikawa FK, Shinohara EH. Mucocele of the glands of Blandin–Nuhn. Clinical, pathological, and therapeutical aspects. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2011; 15: 11-13
  9. Ayhan E, Ucmak D, Baykara SN, Akkurt ZM, Arica M. Clinical and dermoscopic evaluation of cutaneous leishmaniasis. International Journal of Dermatology 2015; 54: 193-201
  10. Kaminska-Winciorek G, Calik J, Wydmanski J, Schwartz RA, Czajkowski R. Primary melanoma in rare locations: clinical and dermatoscopic features. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology 2004; 80: 369-371
  11. Salah E. Clinical and dermoscopic spectrum of discoid lupus erythematosus: novel observations from lips and oral mucosa. International Journal of Dermatology 2018; 57: 830-836
  12. Chaitanya P, Praveen D, Reddy M. Mucocele on Lower Lip: A Case Series. Indian Dermatology Online Journal 2017; 8: 205-207
  13. Neville B, Damn DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JJ. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: W. B. Saunders; 2002. pp. 389-392
  14. Baurmash HD. Mucoceles and ranulas. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2003; 61: 369-378
  15. Nico MM, Park JH, Lourenco SV. Mucocele in pediatric patients: analysis of 36 children. Pediatric Dermatology 2008; 25: 308-311
  16. Chi AC, Lambert PR 3rd, Richardson MS, Neville BW. Oral mucoceles: a clinicopathologic review of 1,824