Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Validation of the NoSAS score for screening sleep-disordered breathing: A sleep clinicbased study in Turkey

Pages
319–327
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Not only in moderate to severe SDB but also in mild SDB, the NoSAS score performed better than the other 3 screening tools.Key words: NoSAS score, sleep-disordered breathing, STOP-Bang, Berlin questionnaire

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The NoSAS score is a new tool for the identification of high-risk patients for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to validate the NoSAS score in a sleep clinical population in Turkey and compare its performance with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), STOP-Bang, and Berlin questionnaires for high-risk SDB.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Not only in moderate to severe SDB but also in mild SDB, the NoSAS score performed better than the other 3 screening tools.Key words: NoSAS score, sleep-disordered breathing, STOP-Bang, Berlin questionnaire
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The NoSAS score is a new tool for the identification of high-risk patients for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). The aim of this study was to validate the NoSAS score in a sleep clinical population in Turkey and compare its performance with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), STOP-Bang, and Berlin questionnaires for high-risk SDB. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study. Patients who had a full-night PSG examination between 01.03.2017 and 01.01.2018 at the sleep center of our hospital were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, anthropometrics measurements, ESS, STOP-Bang, and Berlin scores were collected from the existing data of the patients. The NoSAS score was subsequently calculated based on available data. Predictive parameters for each screening questionnaires were calculated to compare the discriminative power of those for high-risk SDB.Results: A total of 450 patients were included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the NoSAS score were 81%, 51.2%, 88.2%, and 37.5% for an AHI (apnea–hypopnea index) ≥ 5 event/h and 84.5%, 38.2%, 66%, and 63.4% for an AHI ≥ 15 event/h, respectively. AUC percentages for the NoSAS score, STOP-Bang questionnaire, Berlin questionnaire, and ESS were 0.740, 0.737, 0.626, and 0.571 for an AHI ≥ 5 events/h and 0.715, 0.704, 0.574, and 0.621 for an AHI ≥ 30 events/h. The NoSAS score had a false negative rate of 2.9% for severe SDB.Conclusion: The NoSAS score had a good degree of differentiation for SDB and can be used as an easily applicable, subjective, and effective screening tool in a sleep clinical population in Turkey. Not only in moderate to severe SDB but also in mild SDB, the NoSAS score performed better than the other 3 screening tools.Key words: NoSAS score, sleep-disordered breathing, STOP-Bang, Berlin questionnaire

🔖

Cite This Article

ORMAN, M. N., BATUM, Ö., ARSLAN, B. O., UÇAR, Z. Z. (2022). Validation of the NoSAS score for screening sleep-disordered breathing: A sleep clinicbased study in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 319–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/609559

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, Palta M, Hagen EW et al. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. American Journal of Epidemiology 2013
  2. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws342 2. Young T, Evans L, Finn L, Palta M. Estimation of the clinically diagnosed proportion of sleep apnea syndrome in middle-aged men and women. Sleep 1997
  3. 20 (9): 705-706. doi:10.1093/ sleep/20.9.705 3. Heinzer R, Vat S, Marques-Vidal P, Marti-Soler H, Andries D et al. Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: the HypnoLaus study. Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2015
  4. 3(4):310-318. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00043-0 4. Flemons WW, Douglas NJ, Kuna ST, Rodenstein DO, Wheatley J. Access to diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected sleep apnea. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2004
  5. 169 (6):668-672. doi:10.1164/rccm.200308- 1124PP 5. Amra B, Rahmati B, Soltaninejad F, Feizi A. Screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea: an updated systematic review. Oman Medical Journal 2018
  6. 33 (3): 184- 192. doi: 10.5001/omj.2018.36 6. Chiu HY, Chen PY, Chuang LP, Chen NH, Tu YK et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Berlin questionnaire, STOP-BANG, STOP, and Epworth sleepiness scale in detecting obstructive sleep apnea: A bivariate meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews 2017
  7. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2016.10.004 7. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991
  8. 14 (6): 540-545. doi:10.1093/sleep/14.6.540 8. Marti-Soler H, Hirotsu C, Marques-Vidal P, Vollenweider P, Waeber G et al. The NoSAS score for screening of sleepdisordered breathing: a derivation and validation study. Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2016. doi:10.1016/S2213- 2600(16)30075-3 9. Netzer NC, Stoohs RA, Netzer CM, Clark K, Strohl KP. Using the Berlin questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the sleep apnea syndrome. Annals of Internal Medicine 1999
  9. 131 (7): 485-491. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-131-7-199910050-00002 10. Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, Chung SA, Vairavanathan S et al. STOP questionnaire: A tool to screen patients for obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2008
  10. 108 (5): 812-21. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31816d83e4 11. Izci B, Ardic S, Firat H, Sahin A, Altinors M et al. Reliability and validity studies of the Turkish version of the Epworth Sleepiness scale. Sleep and Breathing 2008
  11. 12 (2): 161-168. doi:10.1007/s11325-007-0145-7 12. Yüceege M, Fırat H, Sever Ö, Demir A, Ardıç S. The effe