Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of the effect of bipolar coagulation and fibrillar structured oxidized cellulose on formation epidural fibrosis in rats

Pages
2206–2212
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The use of fibrillar oxidized cellulose was more effective for hemostasis than bipolar coagulation in reducing the development of EF.Key words: Epidural fibrosis, failed back surgery syndrome, bipolar coagulation, fibrillar oxidized cellulose, laminectomy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Epidural fibrosis (EF) is a common cause of failed back surgery syndrome seen after spinal surgeries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: In the study, 45 male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into three groups (control, fibrillar, and bipolar).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The use of fibrillar oxidized cellulose was more effective for hemostasis than bipolar coagulation in reducing the development of EF.Key words: Epidural fibrosis, failed back surgery syndrome, bipolar coagulation, fibrillar oxidized cellulose, laminectomy
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Epidural fibrosis (EF) is a common cause of failed back surgery syndrome seen after spinal surgeries. The most frequent reason for the formation of EF is accumulated blood and its products in the operation zone. On the development of EF, the effect of bipolar coagulation and fibrillar oxidized cellulose, which are used frequently to control bleeding, was investigated. Materials and methods: In the study, 45 male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into three groups (control, fibrillar, and bipolar). Lumbar laminectomy was applied to all rats under sterile conditions. In the control group, the epidural area was washed with saline solution. Bleeding was controlled with fibrillar oxidized cellulose in the fibrillar group, with bipolar coagulation in the bipolar group. The area to which laminectomy had been applied was removed as a block 6 weeks later and evaluated histopathologically and genetically in terms of EF development. Fibrosis degree was determined histopathologically by counting fibroblasts using the modified Lubina and EF He grading systems. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGFβ-1), and mRNA levels were measured by the droplet digital polymerase chain reaction method. Results: The number of epidural fibroblasts, percentage of modified Lubina, amount of IL-6, and He grading rates were significantly lower in the fibrillar group than in the bipolar and control groups (p ˂ 0.05). On the other hand, there was no significant difference among the control, fibrillar, and bipolar groups in terms of TGFβ-1 values (p= 0.525). Conclusion: The use of fibrillar oxidized cellulose was more effective for hemostasis than bipolar coagulation in reducing the development of EF.Key words: Epidural fibrosis, failed back surgery syndrome, bipolar coagulation, fibrillar oxidized cellulose, laminectomy

🔖

Cite This Article

TUFAN, A., EREN, B., GÜZEY, F. K., TAŞ, A., ÇAY, T., UYANIK, B., ÇETİN, E., ÖRNEK, M. (2022). Comparison of the effect of bipolar coagulation and fibrillar structured oxidized cellulose on formation epidural fibrosis in rats. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4, 2206–2212. https://ajindex.com/articles/609527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Abramovitz JN, Neff SR. Lumbar disc surgery: results of the prospective lumbar discectomy study of the joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery 1991; 29 (2): 301-308. doi:10.1227/00006123-199108000-00027 2. Hayek SM, Helm S, Benyamin RM, Singh V, Bryce DA et al. Effectiveness of spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis in post lumbar surgery syndrome: a systematic review. Pain Physician 2009; 12 (2): 419-435. 3. Eldin MMM, Razek NMA. Epidural fibrosis after lumbar disc surgery: prevention and outcome evaluation. Asian Spine Journal 2015; 9 (3): 370. doi:10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.370 4. Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RC, Petrie JL, Obuchowski N et al. Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. ADCON-L European Study Group. Neurosurgery 1996; 38 (4): 855-861; discussion 861-3. 5. Burton CV. Causes of failure of surgery in the lumbar spine: 10 year follow-up. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 1991; 58 (2): 183-187. 6. Njobvu PD, McGill PE. Sulphasalazine in the treatment of HIVrelated spondyloarthropathy. British Journal of Rheumatology 1997; 36 (3): 403-404. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/36.3.403 7. Larionov SN, Sorokovikov V, Erdyneyev K, Lepekhova S, Goldberg O. Experimental model of intervertebral disk mediated postoperative epidural fibrosis. Annals of Neurosciences 2016; 23 (2): 76-80. 8. Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RC, Petrie JL, Obuchowski N et al. Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. Neurosurgery 1996; 38 (4): 855-863. doi:10.1227/00006123-199604000-00053 9. Bourdel N, Chauvet P, Roman H, Pereira B, Somcutian O et al. Comparison between resection, bipolar coagulation and Plasmajet: a preliminary animal study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2017; 211: 127-133. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.02.004 10. Mirzai H, Eminoglu M, Orguc S. Are drains useful for lumbar disc surgery?: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Clinical Spine Surgery 2006; 19 (3): 171-177. doi:10.1097/01. bsd.0000190560.20872.a7 11. Gürer B, Kahveci R, Gökçe EC, Ozevren H, Turkoglu E et al. Evaluation of topical application and systemic administration of rosuvastatin in preventing epidural fibrosis in rats. The Spine Journal 2015; 15 (3): 522-529. doi:10.1016/j.spi