Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of atrial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation patients with three different methods

Pages
175–187
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our findings are significant as they demonstrate the compatibility of these techniques for the atrial fibrosis evaluation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The presence of atrial fibrosis has already been known as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: A total of 30 patients were enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our findings are significant as they demonstrate the compatibility of these techniques for the atrial fibrosis evaluation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The presence of atrial fibrosis has already been known as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) development. We aimed to evaluate atrial fibrosis with previously defined three different methods, which were cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (C-MRI), echocardiographic strain imaging, and biomarkers and show the relationship between these methods in patients with AF scheduled for cryoballoon ablation. Materials and methods: A total of 30 patients were enrolled. Atrial T1 relaxation durations were measured using C-MRI before the procedure of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21) and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) levels were measured at serum derived from the femoral artery (Peripheral FGF 21 and 23) and left atrium blood samples (Central FGF 21 and 23) before catheter ablation. Preprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed. The median follow-up duration for atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence was 13 (12–18 months) months. Results: The mean ages of the study group were 55.23 ± 12.37 years, and there were 17 (56.7%) female patients in study population. There were negative correlations between post contrast T1 relaxation durations of both posterior and posterosuperior atrium, and central FGF-23 (r: – 0.561; p = 0.003; r:–0.624; p = 0.001; Posterior T1 vs. central FGF-23 levels and Posterosuperior T1 vs central FGF-23 levels, respectively). The positive correlations were observed between postcontrast posterior T1 relaxation durations and left ventricle ejection fraction (r:0.671; p = 0.001); left atrial emptying fraction (r:0.482; p = 0.013); peak atrial longitudinal strain (r:0.605; p = 0.001), and peak atrial contraction strain (r:0.604; p = 0.001). Also negative correlation was observed between postcontrast posterior T1 relaxation durations, and left atrial volume index (r: – 0.467; p = 0.016). Conclusion: Our studies showed that there are correlations between T1 mapping of atrial tissue, biomarkers, and atrial mechanics evaluated with transthoracic echocardiography. Our findings are significant as they demonstrate the compatibility of these techniques for the atrial fibrosis evaluation.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, N., ATEŞ, A. H., YORGUN, H., CANPOLAT, U., AYTEMİR, K., KAYA, E. B., DİKMEN, Z. G., ERDEMİR, A. G., BAKIR, E. N., ÇÖTELİ, C., HAZIROLAN, T. (2022). Evaluation of atrial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation patients with three different methods. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 175–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/609247

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Packer DL, Kowal RC, Wheelan KR, Irwin JM, Champagne J, Guerra PG et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013; 61 (16): 1713-1723. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.064 2. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2018; 20 (1): e1-e160. doi: 10.1093/ europace/eux274 3. Darby AE. Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation: Considerations for Repeat Ablation and Strategies to Optimize Success. Journal of Atrial Fibrillation 2016; 9 (1): 1427. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1427 4. Velagapudi P, Turagam MK, Leal MA, Kocheril AG. Atrial fibrosis: a risk stratifier for atrial fibrillation. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 2013; 11 (2): 155-160. doi: 10.1586/ erc.12.174 5. Canpolat U, Oto A, Hazirolan T, Sunman H, Yorgun H, Sahiner L et al. A prospective DE-MRI study evaluating the role of TGF-beta1 in left atrial fibrosis and implications for outcomes of cryoballoon-based catheter ablation: new insights into primary fibrotic atriocardiomyopathy. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 2015; 26 (3): 251-259. doi: 10.1111/jce.12578 6. Qureshi NA, Kim SJ, Cantwell CD, Afonso VX, Bai W, Ali RL et al. Voltage during atrial fibrillation is superior to voltage during sinus rhythm in localizing areas of delayed enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging: An assessment of the posterior left atrium in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2019; 16 (9): 1357-1367. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.032 7. Kis Z, Hendriks AA, Muka T, Bramer WM, Kovacs I, SziliTorok T. The Role of Atrial Fibrosis Detected by Delayed - Enhancement MRI in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. Current Medical Imaging Reviews 2020; 16 (2): 135-144. doi: 10.2174 /1573405614666180806130327 8. Reiter U, Reiter C, Krauter C, Fuchsjager M, Reiter G. Cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping. Part 2: Diagnostic potential and applications. European Journal of Radiology 2018; 109: 235-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.013 9. Ling L-h, McLellan AJ, Taylor AJ, Iles LM, Ellims AH, Kumar S et al. Magnetic resonance post-contrast T1 mapping in the human atrium: validation and impact on clinical outcome after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2014; 11 (9): 1551-155