Journals / Turkish Journal of Mathematics / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

A refinement of Newton and Maclaurin inequalities through abstract convexity

Pages
699–709
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When doing this, we obtain lower bounds for the solutions of some special rational equations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the refinements of Maclaurin’s and Newton’s inequalities are given.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These refinements are obtained by applying the results on optimality conditions of abstract convex functions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When doing this, we obtain lower bounds for the solutions of some special rational equations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the refinements of Maclaurin’s and Newton’s inequalities are given. These refinements are obtained by applying the results on optimality conditions of abstract convex functions. When doing this, we obtain lower bounds for the solutions of some special rational equations.

🔖

Cite This Article

TINAZTEPE, G., TINAZTEPE, R. (2022). A refinement of Newton and Maclaurin inequalities through abstract convexity. Turkish Journal of Mathematics, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 699–709. https://ajindex.com/articles/607065

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adilov G, Tinaztepe G. The Sharpening of Some Inequalities via Abstract Convexity. Mathematical Inequalities and Applications 2009; 12: 1-33
  2. Ben-Ari I, Conrad K. Maclaurin’s Inequality and a Generalized Bernoulli Inequality. Mathematics Magazine 2017; 87: 14-24. doi:10.4169/math.mag.87.1.143 [3] Favaro S, Walker S. On a general Maclaurin’s inequality. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2018; 146: 175-88. doi:10.1090/proc/136734 [4] Holtz O. M-Matrices satisfy Newton’s inequalities. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2005; 133: 711-777. doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-04-07576-85 [5] MacDonald IG. Symmetric Functions and Orthogonal Polynomials. Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society 1998
  3. Maclaurin C. IV. A second letter from Mr. Colin McLaurin, Professor of Mathematics in the University of Edinburgh and F. R. S. to Martin Folkes, Esq; concerning the roots of equations, with the demonstration of other rules in algebra; being the continuation of the le. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 1730; 36: 59-96. doi:10.1098/rstl.1729.00117 [7] Newton I. Arithmetica Universalis: Sive De Compositione Et Resolutione Arithmetica Liber. 1707 (in French)
  4. Niculescu CP. A new look at Newton’s inequalities. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2000; 1: 1-14
  5. Pecaric J, Wen J, Wang W, Lu T. A generalization of Maclaurin’s inequalities and its applications. Mathematical Inequalities and Applications 2005; 8: 583- [10] Rosset S. Normalized Symmetric Functions, Newton’s Inequalities, and a New Set of Stronger Inequalities. The American Mathematical Monthly 2018; 96: 815-819. doi:10.1080/00029890.1989.1197228611 [11] Rubinov AM. Abstract Convexity and Global Optimization. New York: Springer; 2000
  6. Rubinov AM, Wu ZY. Optimality conditions in global optimization and their applications. Mathematical Programming 2009; 120 (1): 101-123. doi:10.1007/s10107-007-0142-413 [13] Sagan B. The symmetric group: representations, combinatorial algorithms, and symmetric functions. New York: Springer; 2001
  7. Sharma R, Bhandari R. Skewness, Kurtosis and Newton’s Inequality. The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics 2015; 45: 1639-1643
  8. Sharma R, Sharma A, Saini R. Means, moments and Newton’s inequalities. The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics 2019; 49: 1667-1677
  9. Simic S. A Note On Newton’s Inequality. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2009; 10: 1-4
  10. Steele JM. T