Journals / Turkish Journal of Mathematics / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4

A refinement of the Bergström inequality

Pages
1619–1625
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some numerical experiments are given to illustrate the efficacy of the refinement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, the Bergström inequality is studied, and a refinement of this inequality is obtained by performing the optimality conditions based on abstract concavity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, the Bergström inequality is studied, and a refinement of this inequality is obtained by performing the optimality conditions based on abstract concavity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some numerical experiments are given to illustrate the efficacy of the refinement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, the Bergström inequality is studied, and a refinement of this inequality is obtained by performing the optimality conditions based on abstract concavity. Some numerical experiments are given to illustrate the efficacy of the refinement.

🔖

Cite This Article

YEŞİLCE, İ., ADİLOV, G., TINAZTEPE, G. (2022). A refinement of the Bergström inequality. Turkish Journal of Mathematics, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4, 1619–1625. https://ajindex.com/articles/607422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Adilov GR, Tınaztepe G. The sharpening some inequalities via abstract convexity. Mathematical Inequalities and Applications 2012; 12: 33-51
  2. Budak H, Sarıkaya MZ. On generalized Ostrowski-type inequalities for functions whose first derivatives absolute values are convex. Turkish Journal of Mathematics 2016; 40 (6): 1193-1210
  3. Bullen PS, Mitrinovic DS, Vasic PM. Means and Their Inequalities (Mathematics and Its Applications). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 2013
  4. Crouzeix JP, Legaz JEM, Volle M. Generalized Convexity, Generalized Monotonicity: Recent Results. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer, 1998
  5. Dragomir SS, Dutta J, Rubinov AM. Hermite-Hadamard Type inequalities for increasing convex along rays functions. Analysis 2001; 2: 171-181
  6. Jain S, Mehrez K, Baleanu D, Agarwal P. Certain Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities for logarithmically convex functions with applications. Mathematics 2019; 7: 163
  7. Li Y, Gu XM, Xiao J. A note on the proofs of generalized Radon inequality. Mathematica Moravica 2018; 22 (2): 59-67
  8. Li Y, Gu XM, Zhao J. The weighted arithmetic mean-geometric mean inequality is equivalent to the Hölder inequality, Symmetry 2018; 10 (9): 380
  9. Marghidanu, D. Generalizations and refinements for Bergström and Radon’s inequalities. Journal of Science and Arts 2008; 8 (1): 57-62
  10. Marshall A, Olkin I. Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 1979
  11. Özdemir ME, Kavurmacı H, Set E. Ostrowski’s type inequalities for (α, m) – convex functions. Kyungpook Mathematical Journal 2010; 50 (3): 371-378
  12. Pachpatte BG. Analytic Inequalities Recent Advances. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2012
  13. Pavic Z, Ardıç MA. The most important inequalities of m-convex functions. Turkish Journal of Mathematics 2017; 41: 625-635
  14. Pop OT. About Bergström Inequality. Journal of Mathematical Inequalities 2009; 3 (2): 237-242
  15. Rubinov AM. Abstract Convexity and Global optimization. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer, 2000
  16. Rubinov AM, Wu ZY. Optimality conditions in global optimization and their applications. Mathematical Programming 2009; 120 (1): 101-123
  17. Sahir, MJS. Formation of versions of some dynamic inequalities unified on time scale calculus. Ural Mathematical Journal 2018; 4 (2): 88-98
  18. Sarikaya MZ, Set E. Özdemir ME. On new inequalities of Simpson’s type for s -convex functions. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 2010; 60 (8): 2191-219