Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW APPROACH TO MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR TECHNOLOGY: ENHANCED QUORUM QUENCHING ACTIVITY

Pages
77–84
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It could be indicated that regenerated QQ bacteria reduced SMP andEPS by degrading the signal molecules, thus more efficient control of membrane fouling was achieved.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Quorum Quenching (QQ) is a mechanism that prevents cell to cell communication and has recently used as an effectivecontrol method against biofouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, iteventually caused to decrease in QQ activity as a result of a decline in the number of viable QQ cells in theimmobilization media over time, especially during long-term MBR operations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It could be indicated that regenerated QQ bacteria reduced SMP andEPS by degrading the signal molecules, thus more efficient control of membrane fouling was achieved.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Quorum Quenching (QQ) is a mechanism that prevents cell to cell communication and has recently used as an effectivecontrol method against biofouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Rotary microbial carrier frame (RMCF) is aninnovative application used in QQ-controlled MBRs that provides immobilization medium to QQ bacteria. However, iteventually caused to decrease in QQ activity as a result of a decline in the number of viable QQ cells in theimmobilization media over time, especially during long-term MBR operations. In this study, the effect of regeneration ofthe QQ cells in the immobilization media on biofouling control in MBR was investigated. The growth kinetic ofRhodococcus sp. BH4 as model QQ bacteria was revealed and the bacteria regeneration time was obtained as 28.3 days.In the operation of the regenerated group, an additional QQ activity of 38.2% was achieved compared to control during a14 day-duration of QQ-controlled MBR operation. It could be indicated that regenerated QQ bacteria reduced SMP andEPS by degrading the signal molecules, thus more efficient control of membrane fouling was achieved.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koyuncu, İ., Can, T. E., Mutlu, B. K., AĞTAŞ, M., Lee, C. H. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW APPROACH TO MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR TECHNOLOGY: ENHANCED QUORUM QUENCHING ACTIVITY. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 77–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/605506

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ahmed Z, Cho J, Lim BR, Song KG, Ahn KH. (2007) “Effects of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor”. Journal of membrane science. Jan 15; 287(2):211-8.
  2. Barrios AF, Zuo R, Hashimoto Y, Yang L, Bentley WE, Wood TK. (2006) “Autoinducer 2 controls biofilm formation in Escherichia coli through a novel motility quorum-sensing regulator (MqsR, B3022)”. Journal of bacteriology. Jan 1;188(1):305-16.
  3. Cheong WS, Kim SR, Oh HS, Lee SH, Yeon KM, Lee CH, Lee JK. Design of quorum quenching microbial vessel to enhance cell viability for biofouling control in membrane bioreactor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014 Jan 1;24(1):97-105.
  4. Dong YH, Zhang LH. (2005) “Quorum sensing and quorum-quenching enzymes”. The Journal of Microbiology. Feb;43(1):101-9.
  5. Drews A. (2010) “Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors—characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures”. Journal of membrane science. Nov 1;363(1-2):1- 28. Dvořák L, Gómez M, Dvořáková M, Růžičková I, Wanner J. (2011) “The impact of different operating conditions on membrane fouling and EPS production”. Bioresource technology. Jul 1;102(13):6870-5.
  6. Ergön-Can T, Köse-Mutlu B, Koyuncu İ, Lee CH. (2017) “Biofouling control based on bacterial quorum quenching with a new application: rotary microbial carrier frame”. Journal of membrane science. Mar 1;525:116-24. Ergön‐Can T, Köseoğlu‐İmer DY, Algur ÖF, Koyuncu İ. (2016) “Effect of different nanomaterials on the metabolic activity and bacterial flora of activated sludge medium”. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water. Nov;44(11):1508- 15. Hammer BK, Bassler BL. (2003) “Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae”. Molecular microbiology. Oct;50(1):101-4.
  7. Jahangir D, Oh HS, Kim SR, Park PK, Lee CH, Lee JK. (2012) “Specific location of enca.psulated quorum quenching bacteria for biofouling control in an external submerged membrane bioreactor”. Journal of membrane science. Sep 1;411:130-6.
  8. Kawaguchi T, Chen YP, Norman RS, Decho AW. (2008) “Rapid screening of quorum-sensing signal Nacyl homoserine lactones by an in vitro cell-free assay”. Applied Environmental Microbiology. Jun 15;74(12):3667-71.
  9. Kim SR, Oh HS, Jo SJ, Yeon KM, Lee CH, Lim DJ, Lee CH, Lee JK. (2013) “Biofouling control with beadentrapped quorum quenching bacteria in membrane bioreactors: physical and biological effects”. Environmental science & technology. Jan 4;47(2):836- 42. Koseoglu-Imer DY, Kose B, Altinbas M, Koyuncu I. (2013) “The production of polysul